Hi Misc@,
I noticed that this ICMP traffic always gets a bad checksum leaving the
router.
sample:
on routerA(accessRouter)
$ ping 203.190.abc.xyz
PING 203.190.abc.xyz: 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 203.190.abc.xyz: icmp_seq=0 ttl=58 time=6.215 ms
64 bytes from
Route lookups are based on the *destination* address not the source
address, you could add a route for a certain destination via a
certain interface to send packets out that way.
Hmm. that sounds good to me. Since I have 2 interfaces for 2 different WAN
connections. It is possible to add
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 09:13:30AM -0400, Simon Perreault wrote:
On 2012-05-11 04:15, Garry Dolley wrote:
I now have an amd64 test VM set up, where I installed stock 5.0.
I ran a lot of traffic over em0 without any timeouts.
That's expected. 5.0 has been running without issue for me for a
On 2012/05/17 13:20, Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
Route lookups are based on the *destination* address not the source
address, you could add a route for a certain destination via a
certain interface to send packets out that way.
Hmm. that sounds good to me. Since I have 2
Thank you very much for explanations.
It works very good.
Thank you,
Bogdan
From: Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org
To: misc@openbsd.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2012 6:08 PM
Subject: Re:
trunk0 with dual stack
On 2012-05-16, Bogdan Andu bo...@yahoo.com
hi
why you not try the relayd way ?
look at
http://gouloum.fr/doc/multilink.html
the part with relayd
holger
On 2012/05/17 13:20, Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
Route lookups are based on the *destination* address not the source
address, you could add a route for a certain destination
why you not try the relayd way ?
look at
http://gouloum.fr/doc/multilink.html
the part with relayd
holger
On 2012/05/17 13:20, Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
Route lookups are based on the *destination* address not the source
address, you could add a route for a
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 09:13:30AM -0400, Simon Perreault wrote:
On 2012-05-11 04:15, Garry Dolley wrote:
I now have an amd64 test VM set up, where I installed stock 5.0.
I ran a lot of traffic over em0 without any timeouts.
That's expected. 5.0 has been running without issue for me for a
why you not try the relayd way ?
look at
http://gouloum.fr/doc/multilink.html
the part with relayd
I found that URL yesterday, I will have to learn it. I just try to
do it with a shell script.
anyway, Thanks a lot.
--
Thank you
Indunil Jayasooriya
No, your script or ifstated config will need to adjust this rule,
you can do this by using a macro to write the rule, something like this:
GATEWAYS=1.1.1.1@em0 2.2.2.2@em1
pass in on $int_if from $lan_net route-to { $GATEWAYS }
This helps because you can override the macro on the pfctl
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 03:19:07AM -0700, Garry Dolley wrote:
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 09:13:30AM -0400, Simon Perreault wrote:
On 2012-05-11 04:15, Garry Dolley wrote:
I now have an amd64 test VM set up, where I installed stock 5.0.
I ran a lot of traffic over em0 without any timeouts.
Hi,
This traffic is blocked on the external interface of the firewall.
May 17 11:34:56.013614 rule 7/(match) block in on em1:
66.220.151.124.47369 xxx.yyy.ddd.zzz.53: 58106 NS? . (19)
May 17 11:34:56.763086 rule 7/(match) block in on em1:
66.220.151.124.47369 xxx.yyy.ddd.zzz.53: 58107 NS? .
ager39...@mypacks.net writes:
What rules should I have in pf.conf for both greylisting and
blacklisting? I'd like to blacklist those site that got spam through
the greylisting.
Unless you explicitly start spamd in blacklisting-only mode, it will
greylist.
The spamd related rules I have in
Most likely that someone posted a link to a resource in your domain, and
your DNS appears to be an authoritative for that zone. Sounds quite
realistic. There on facebook might be some kind of parser trying to
retreive a preview for the link or something similar...
Anyway, have a look at the DNS
I wonder if these machines in the facebook.com domain are infected
with some malware bots?
Facebook *is* a malware bot:)
Let the request through and log what it tries to do next, this could be quite a
story.
-- p
Didn't take into account that you do not publish the DNS. That fact
makes my assumption wrong.
Really, go and log the requests! =)
17.05.2012 15:50, Siju George P=P0P?P8QP0P;:
This traffic is blocked on the external interface of the firewall.
--
Best regards,
Pavel Shvagirev
skype:
http://meetings.ripe.net/ripe-52/presentations/ripe52-plenary-dnsamp.pdf
I am putting up OpenBSD 5.1 for the first time and I am getting
May 17 11:36:59 mail named[6539]: starting BIND 9.4.2-P2
May 17 11:37:00 mail named[6539]: command channel listening on 127.0.0.1#953
May 17 11:37:00 mail named[6539]: running
May 17 11:37:00 mail named[6539]:
Hi Chris,
Chris Cappuccio wrote on Thu, May 03, 2012 at 09:31:55PM -0700:
Mike Erdely [m...@erdelynet.com] wrote:
FYI: For a test, I added foo with useradd(8) and bar with adduser(8):
# grep -E (foo|bar) /etc/master.passwd
foo:*:1002:1002::0:0::/home/foo:/bin/ksh
Hi,
Daniel, maybe you should pass over natural instinct of being
associated with a good thing and change the domain name and the layout
of the site. As it is now, it will look like OpenBSD mantained site
for a beginner.
Just a tought, nothing personal.
Le 2012-05-17 22:41, Mihai Popescu a C)critB :
Hi,
Daniel, maybe you should pass over natural instinct of being
associated with a good thing and change the domain name and the
layout
of the site. As it is now, it will look like OpenBSD mantained site
for a beginner.
Just a tought, nothing
FESTIVAL LE CHIEN A PLUMES /// 2.3.4.5 AOUT 2012
LANGRES - Lac de Villegusien - 52
QUOI DE NEUF ?? Au chien ` plumes ...
_
___
GROUNDATION REJOINT LA PROGRAMMATION DU JEUDI 2 AOUT !!
Les
Hi all,
I am trying to install the APC extension for PHP on my OBSD server.
Steps taken: pkg_add pecl-APC-3.1.7p0.tgz which works fine
When I use pkg_info to check, it tells me to create a symbolic link
from /etc/php-${PV}.sample/${MODULE_NAME}.ini to
/etc/php-${PV}/${MODULE_NAME}.ini however,
cp: /mnt/oldhome/xxx/Virtualisation/QEmu/FreeBSD/doc/doc.gd:
Bad file descriptor
Why are you usign cp? Why don't you dump | restore?
hi
still looking for an answer to the following question
hi all
have configured two firewalls with carp
i have connectivity to the internet and the firewalls failover properly.
when i check the carp states of each firewall the slave reports that its
wan connection is in the master state the same
May 19: Happy Birthday, Theo!
*** NOTE *** Please DO NOT CC me. I am subscribed to the list.
Mail to the sender address that does not originate at the list server is
tarpitted. The reply-to: address is provided for those who feel compelled to
reply off list. Thankyou.
Rod/
---
This life is not
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Jonathan Gray j...@jsg.id.au wrote:
http://meetings.ripe.net/ripe-52/presentations/ripe52-plenary-dnsamp.pdf
Thankyou so much :-)
Siju
27 matches
Mail list logo
