I don't think there is a word for chroot back. Once you limit yourself
into a chroot, you are stuck in it and get special treatment until you
exit. Apart from why mknod wants to fail inside chroots, having a simple
syscall being able to take you out of it would defeat the whole purpose, no?
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 2:24 AM, Janne Johansson icepic...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think there is a word for chroot back.
I don't think you read, understood, and executed the sample.
After chroot(/), or chroot(FOO), you can't mknod(2), therefore the
description is wrong.
Once you limit
On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 02:59:08AM -0430, Andres Perera wrote:
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 2:24 AM, Janne Johansson icepic...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think there is a word for chroot back.
I don't think you read, understood, and executed the sample.
After chroot(/), or chroot(FOO), you can't
On Sat, 7 Jun 2014 14:19:33 +0400
Solar Designer so...@openwall.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 07, 2014 at 09:13:36AM +0200, Francois Ambrosini wrote:
On Sat, 7 Jun 2014 07:04:47 +0400
Solar Designer so...@openwall.com wrote:
Being on the distros list is not mandatory to receive advance
On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 10:38:50AM +0200, Francois Ambrosini wrote:
I am a mere user who happened to spot an inconsistency and wanted to
inform all parties.
I appreciate the constructive nature of your messages.
I will not comment on your guesses and opinions with information I do
not have.
On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 10:26:48AM +0400, Solar Designer wrote:
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 04:38:24PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Kurt and Solar --
You are the primary contacts for the oss-security email list.
Kurt is not.
Sorry for going slightly off-topic, since this is not an OpenBSD
On 7 Jun 2014, at 23:35, Mattieu Baptiste mattie...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 8:51 PM, JB M jbm.li...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm having troubles installing OpenBSD 5.5 (amd64) on a mSATA SSD card (
http://pcengines.ch/msata16a.htm) PC Engines APU.1C device (
Hi,
While updating an older system (5.4) today to current I wasn't sure if
I've already passed the bump to 64bit time_t.
While searching for it I got into this:
http://daemonforums.org/showthread.php?t=7021
which has a simple script to check.
# date -r 2147483648
Tue Jan 19 05:14:08 EET 2038
Is there a known problem with the Radeon driver on OpenBSD 5.5 AMD64
stable? I noticed the text on the console was scrolling very slow
while src.tar.gz was extracting. I didn't time it, but it seem to take
2 to 3 times as long to return to the command line compared to
extracting the same
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 4:21 AM, Otto Moerbeek o...@drijf.net wrote:
On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 02:59:08AM -0430, Andres Perera wrote:
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 2:24 AM, Janne Johansson icepic...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think there is a word for chroot back.
I don't think you read, understood,
On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 02:41:50PM +0300, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
Hi,
While updating an older system (5.4) today to current I wasn't sure if I've
already passed the bump to 64bit time_t.
While searching for it I got into this:
http://daemonforums.org/showthread.php?t=7021
which has
On 08/06/14 17:02, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 02:41:50PM +0300, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
# touch -t 203801201234 y2k38-test
# ls -ld y2k38-test
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 0 Dec 14 1901 y2k38-test
# stat y2k38-test
1024 51995 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 0 0 Dec 14 17:06:36 1901
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 3:51 AM, Otto Moerbeek o...@drijf.net wrote:
On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 02:59:08AM -0430, Andres Perera wrote:
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 2:24 AM, Janne Johansson icepic...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think there is a word for chroot back.
I don't think you read, understood,
Hello all,
I am in the process of adding RPKI/ROA (RFC 6810/RFC 6811) support to
OpenBGPd. I have an almost working PoC but I'd like to hear your opinion
and discuss implementation details with misc@ before going further.
First of all, here is what RPKI-enabled bgpd.conf looks like :
Hi all,
I just installed OpenBSD 5.5 on a sparc64
$ uname -a
OpenBSD test.home 5.5 GENERIC.MP#173 sparc64
I then issued the following commands:
cd /usr/
export CVSROOT=anon...@anoncvs.openbsd.org:/cvs
cvs -d$CVSROOT up -rOPENBSD_5_5 -Pd
Couple of hours later:
cvs server: Updating libexec
U
It feels like you are trying to convince someone that
chroot(/);
equals not being chrooted at all.
In my view several things happen when a pid is started in a chroot,
including
1. the dir used as a parameter for the chroot will always be its own parent
dir so that you may never again go above it.
cd /usr/
export CVSROOT=anon...@anoncvs.openbsd.org:/cvs
cvs -d$CVSROOT up -rOPENBSD_5_5 -Pd
You should run this in /usr/src, not /usr. And you should not run this
command as root either.
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Janne Johansson icepic...@gmail.com wrote:
It feels like you are trying to convince someone that
chroot(/);
equals not being chrooted at all.
Not at all. I'm trying to convince someone to explain what chrooted
means, preferably without changing current
On 2014-06-05, David Vasek va...@fido.cz wrote:
Did you try smartctl from smartmontools for a more detailed report?
I assume there is a 1000-page SMART spec somewhere that would come
in handy for interpreting the responses?
My favourite are:
smartctl -a /dev/sd1c
smartctl -l scttemp
On 2014-06-05, STeve Andre' and...@msu.edu wrote:
I think you are relying on the smart system too much.
Not at all, but I knew people would immediately direct me to it.
Certainly try what David said, but it's obvious that the disk is
sick despite what the smart system may say.
I got a
I bought a new, cheap HP Deskjet 2540 printer (usb and wireless). The wireless
setup was a touch button WPS first on the printer and then on the Virgin
Superhub2 (some netgear job that I don't like - ought to have stayed with my
old ISP). That worked but the router webpage did not show the
I've been using amd64 snapshots on an early MacPro and had mixed
results. The base itself is solid. Many packages less so. Browsers in
particular (I mostly use xombrero with firefox as a fallback) are prone
to crashing w/core files. In the snapshot I tried last night (dmesg
below) a new behavior
Trying to compile kde4's libs I get the below error. I see it's related
to the recent ssl changes, but I don't see what I need to do to get
around this. The system is 5.5-current, compiled on June 4th. I
love the GNU messasge, too. ;-)
What am I missing here? I haven't found anything about
Hello everyone,
For a few weeks i was wondering what happened to the projects that have
been accepted for this year's Google Summer of Code.
I have run a quick search but haven't found anything meaningful
(whether there are any reports of progress, where the in-progress code is
hosted etc).
I
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014, at 2:22, Alex-P. Natsios wrote:
Hello everyone,
For a few weeks i was wondering what happened to the projects that have
been accepted for this year's Google Summer of Code.
I have run a quick search but haven't found anything meaningful
(whether there are any reports
On 06/09/14 01:16, STeve Andre' wrote:
Trying to compile kde4's libs I get the below error. I see it's related
to the recent ssl changes, but I don't see what I need to do to get
around this. The system is 5.5-current, compiled on June 4th. I
love the GNU messasge, too. ;-)
What am I
On 06/08/14 20:45, Nigel Taylor wrote:
On 06/09/14 01:16, STeve Andre' wrote:
Trying to compile kde4's libs I get the below error. I see it's related
to the recent ssl changes, but I don't see what I need to do to get
around this. The system is 5.5-current, compiled on June 4th. I
love the
I've been using one (early 2008 model?) for several weeks now.
Suspend works, hw.setperf works, radeondrm works for X, internal audio
doesn't seem to work, but I can't say I've spent a long time trying to
make it work.
There are a few minor issues, like the console framebuffer doesn't take
up
On 08.06.2014 22:55, Allan Streib wrote:
I've been using amd64 snapshots on an early MacPro and had mixed
results. The base itself is solid. Many packages less so. Browsers in
particular (I mostly use xombrero with firefox as a fallback) are
prone
to crashing w/core files. In the snapshot I
29 matches
Mail list logo
