Hi,
talking about setting the record straight...
System Administrator wrote on Sat, Oct 04, 2014 at 11:57:56PM -0400:
2. Open*BSD* as the name implies, had no decades old Unix code and
by now has had much of the _original_ BSD code replaced as well.
The ancestors of OpenBSD are, in direct
On Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 11:36:33AM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
Hi,
talking about setting the record straight...
System Administrator wrote on Sat, Oct 04, 2014 at 11:57:56PM -0400:
2. Open*BSD* as the name implies, had no decades old Unix code and
by now has had much of the
1. OpenBSD is a great example of the difference that having security as
a primary design and development objective makes, unlike most other
OSes (including all flavors of linux) which do added security.
Yes, primary objective. Definitely.
It is also form of added security, because it is based on
On 03/10/14 19:07, Russell Sutherland wrote:
I am trying to determine whether using an OpenBSD system to perform
institutional NAT for our wireless users would be a viable option.
At the present time we are evaluating the A10 Thunder CGN appliance.
There are a few issues for which I would
Thanks for your guide.
But my truble is:
1. isp lan - i get IP by dhclient(ip + default route + dns)
2. I have global ip, but this is not working. In ifconfig i cant see my
global ip.(((
How setup /etc/ipsec.conf with dhclient with global IP???
04.10.2014 18:54, Zhi-Qiang Lei пишет:
On Oct
Hi,
Following http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=140508090726719w=2,
I'm trying to implement a similar setup.
relayd(8) is listening on a public IP.
httpd(8) is listening on localhost:80 and apache-httpd-openbsd is
listening on localhost:81.
I would like to handle all traffic with
On 2014-10-03, Russell Sutherland russell.sutherl...@utoronto.ca wrote:
I am trying to determine whether using an OpenBSD system to perform
institutional NAT for our wireless users would be a viable option.
At the present time we are evaluating the A10 Thunder CGN appliance.
There are a few
People wrote:
There are two things which irritates me in computing:
1. Need of security updates
2. Two pieces of technology which are not compatible with each other.
I'm GLAD that finally we have Javascript. At last, we have language and
platform that WORKS universally.
Except it
So The partition has to be raid, vs 4.2 BSD
Onward to my new disk...
--STeve Andre'
Sent with AquaMail for Android
http://www.aqua-mail.com
On October 6, 2014 12:22:25 AM STeve Andre' and...@msu.edu wrote:
So I am missing something, or being dumb.
sd0j is a 128g piece of disk.
So I am missing something, or being dumb.
sd0j is a 128g piece of disk. Doing
bioctl -c C -l /dev/sd0j softraid0
Gives
softraid0: invalid metadata format
What am I missing? This is an amd64 snap of
Oct 4th. The vnconfig way of encryption has worked till I decided to do
things the new
10 matches
Mail list logo
