usb_interrupt_write: can't open /dev/ugen1.01 for bulk read: Device not configured

I have this USB ANT+ stick "Dynastream Innovations ANT USBStick2" rev 2.00/1.00 addr 2 which works "ok" under OpenBSD 5.2 in conjunction with libusb-0.1.12 in Golden Cheetah on a Dell laptop. Unfortunately that laptop hangs after 5-25 minutes of using this (most likely a HW problem: the fan

Re: how to submit bug report regarding pf queueing?

On 2016-03-09, Mihai Popescu wrote: >> - >> queue download on $if_int bandwidth 10M max 10M >> queue ssh parent download bandwidth 1M >> queue web parent download bandwidth 8M >> queue bulk parent download bandwidth 1M default >> >> match to port sshset queue ssh

Re: Small FW boxes for CORP use (was: T40E APU?)

On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 8:19 AM, Patrick Dohman wrote: > Superfluous access to sensor data & watch guard timers etc... It's pretty useful in high availability enterprise environments. There is no other good way to collect some of that sensor data. Brandon Vincent

Re: Small FW boxes for CORP use (was: T40E APU?)

> -Original Message- > From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf Of Josh > Grosse > Sent: 12 March 2016 13:22 > To: misc@openbsd.org > Subject: Re: Small FW boxes for CORP use (was: T40E APU?) > > On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 10:34:16AM +, Kapfhammer, Stefan

how to mount encription volume

hi, I use the bioctl encryption on boot volume. example A: fdisk -iy sd0 echo -n "a a\n64\n\nRAID\np\nw\nq\n\n" |disklabel -E sd0 bioctl -c C -l /dev/sd0a softraid0 then, OpenBSD detect sd1 and I install the OpenBSD on sd1a. It's OK. X and any process are running on these drive[call A:]. I

Re: Small FW boxes for CORP use (was: T40E APU?)

The super micro IPMI/BMC is pretty genius Superfluous access to sensor data & watch guard timers etc... > On Mar 12, 2016, at 7:34 AM, torsten wrote: > >> -Original Message- >> From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf Of > Josh >>

/etc/hosts during install

Has the attitude towards /etc/hosts changed again? After a fresh install of current/i386, 127.0.0.1 localhost ::1 localhost 192.168.22.4www.stare.cz www The first two I would expect. The last one was assigned to me via DHCP during install; I am

Re: Small FW boxes for CORP use (was: T40E APU?)

On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 10:34:16AM +, Kapfhammer, Stefan wrote: > But how would you feed the CAT female jack out of the original > pcengines enclosure? There are no further mounting holes in it. I was thinking of the Alix, where enclosures are not included.

Re: how to mount encription volume

On Sat, 12 Mar 2016 12:19:59 + freeu...@ruggedinbox.com wrote: > hi, I use the bioctl encryption on boot volume. It's called "softraid crypto". > example A: > bioctl -c C -l /dev/sd0a softraid0 > example B: > vnconfig -ck vnd0 /dev/sd0a This is a "vnode pseudo disk device", in this case with

Re: how to mount encription volume

On Sat, 12 Mar 2016 12:19:59 + freeu...@ruggedinbox.com wrote: > hi, I use the bioctl encryption on boot volume. > > example A: > fdisk -iy sd0 > echo -n "a a\n64\n\nRAID\np\nw\nq\n\n" |disklabel -E sd0 > bioctl -c C -l /dev/sd0a softraid0 > > then, OpenBSD detect sd1 and I install the

Re: Watchdog issue

On 2016-03-11, Sjöholm Per-Olov wrote: > Hi > > Yes I after upgrade had a watchdog issue on the em driver and created a lot of > patch diffs of this from cvs without getting rid of the issue. I also tried > 5.8 and a lot of em diffs after 5.8. But this problem lead to the fact I

Re: how to mount encription volume

Thanks for good messages! Example A: Create encryption volume and decryption by bioctl bioctl -c C -l /dev/sd0a softraid0 Example B: Create encryption volume and decryption by vnconfig vnconfig -ck vnd0 /dev/sd0a almost I use Example C: dd if=/dev/urandom of=.vnode bs=512M count=1 vnconfig

Re: /etc/hosts during install

On Mar 12 16:36:37, rob...@peichaer.org wrote: > On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 04:57:04PM +0100, hans wrote: > > Has the attitude towards /etc/hosts changed again? > > After a fresh install of current/i386, > > > > 127.0.0.1 localhost > > ::1 localhost > > 192.168.22.4

Re: /etc/hosts during install

On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 04:57:04PM +0100, hans wrote: > Has the attitude towards /etc/hosts changed again? > After a fresh install of current/i386, > > 127.0.0.1 localhost > ::1 localhost > 192.168.22.4www.stare.cz www > > The first two I would expect. >

Re: /etc/hosts during install

On Mar 12 17:25:45, rob...@peichaer.org wrote: > On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 05:49:32PM +0100, hans wrote: > > On Mar 12 16:36:37, rob...@peichaer.org wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 04:57:04PM +0100, hans wrote: > > > > Has the attitude towards /etc/hosts changed again? > > > > After a fresh

Re: /etc/hosts during install

On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 05:49:32PM +0100, hans wrote: > On Mar 12 16:36:37, rob...@peichaer.org wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 04:57:04PM +0100, hans wrote: > > > Has the attitude towards /etc/hosts changed again? > > > After a fresh install of current/i386, > > > > > > 127.0.0.1