Hi Howard,
Any plan on making LMDB work on OpenBSD?
OpenBSD should deliver LMDB in the MDB_WRITEMAP mode.
(http://lmdb.tech/doc/group__mdb.html)
(At least some effort has been done e.g.
https://gitlab.com/mdb/sqlightning/issues/6 )
Thanks,
Tinker
Sun, 12 Jun 2016 23:48:33 +0200 ropers
> Compiled for myself and the archives:
For you only, the archives deserve much better: higher quality threads.
> < Fanless OpenBSD-capable (probably) laptops >
You're in for a LOT of disappointment if you follow marketing material
On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 4:21 PM, wrote:
> Sun, 12 Jun 2016 23:48:33 +0200 ropers
> > Compiled for myself and the archives:
>
> For you only, the archives deserve much better: higher quality threads.
>
> > < Fanless OpenBSD-capable (probably) laptops >
>
>
> Wrant. Really appreciate it.
Just ignore it, you can't let an isolated response taint your view of the
mailing list! I wish I could help you, but I don't know an answer to your
question.
Hi,
is there an OpenBSD-compatible SBC (Singe Board Computer) that comes close to
raspberryPi size-wise? I saw some x86-based SBCs on kickstarter a while ago,
but lost track of the projects and their OpenBSD compatibility.
I know so far:
- soekris
- pcengines
More?
Bonus points for working
Tinker wrote:
Hi Howard,
Any plan on making LMDB work on OpenBSD?
Not sure what action you're expecting from us. Theo made it quite clear that
OpenBSD does not and will not have a unified buffer cache.
OpenBSD should deliver LMDB in the MDB_WRITEMAP mode.
On 2016.06.12, Dan L??dtke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is there an OpenBSD-compatible SBC (Singe Board Computer) that comes close to
> raspberryPi size-wise? I saw some x86-based SBCs on kickstarter a while ago,
> but lost track of the projects and their OpenBSD compatibility.
>
> I know so far:
> -
There's some reports of Minnowboard Max working with OpenBSD:
http://web.archive.org/web/20150705061723/http://countersiege.com/2015/02/22/minnowboard_max_openbsd.html
Compiled for myself and the archives:
< Fanless OpenBSD-capable (probably) laptops >
Some of these specs/prices highly uncertain/unreliable/subject to change.
Interface abundance decreases from top to bottom.
Toughbooks don't seem to have built-in mics, which may be a plus for the
practical
I've been playing with the Lanner FW7525 - It's a Nice piece of Kit. Can
be had for just under 400$ Depends on what your purposes are - but for
Firewall appliance it's pretty hard to beat at the moment.
On 12 June 2016 at 14:25, wrote:
> There's some reports of
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 05:25:17 +0300
li...@wrant.com wrote:
> ... until you meet the quality expectations.
Irony mode ACTIVATE.
Howard, find three followup Q:s below (3-5), thanks
On 2016-06-13 05:07, Howard Chu wrote:
Tinker wrote:
Hi Howard,
Any plan on making LMDB work on OpenBSD?
Not sure what action you're expecting from us. Theo made it quite
clear that OpenBSD does not and will not have a unified buffer
Mon, 13 Jun 2016 13:07:14 +1000
> Irony mode ACTIVATE.
Exactly: ignore this entire mediocre thread, search the archive instead.
If you can't read the question properly, please remain silent.
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 02:21:48 +0300
li...@wrant.com wrote:
> For you only, the archives deserve much better: higher quality
> threads.
...
> You're in for a LOT of disappointment if you follow marketing material
> without dmesg and
> > Sun, 12 Jun 2016 23:48:33 +0200 ropers
> > > Compiled for myself and the archives:
> >
> > For you only, the archives deserve much better: higher quality threads.
> >
> > > < Fanless OpenBSD-capable (probably) laptops >
> >
> > You're in for a LOT of disappointment
Sun, 12 Jun 2016 11:07:24 +1000
> On the other hand, those types of machines are useless for high-end
> video editing, which may be what a "desktop" is to you.
That's one very complex thought, hold it, keep still, don't move an inch.
No machine is useless, it's the
Thanks for all the private personal attacks and abusive messages such
as this one, Wrant. Really appreciate it.
On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 13:46:47 +0300
li...@wrant.com wrote:
> Shithead. Get lost. You're on auto-delete. You don't exist.
Okay, I understand. It was just that, from my point of view, they were not all
independent to each other, and sending one email for every single questions did
not seem appropriate to me.
I did search the mailing list archive. But it was not that clear for me. That's
why I thought I could
Allow me to explain that complex thought.
I didn't say that all machines are useless, nor did I say that any
machine is useless. One machine that is useful for Purpose #1 is
useless for Purpose #2; likewise, the machine that works well for
Purpose #2 is quite possibly useless for Purpose #1.
Took the same path - updated to the latest snapshot and could no longer
access hidden services, while clearnet routing worked just fine. I also
route all the traffic through tor transparently.
In my case though there was no time jitter but it turned out that
the 127/8 -> 127.0.0.1 route got
20 matches
Mail list logo