Re: relayd l7 loadbalancing

Once connection is established, state is created in PF. Subsequent requests will be ’pipelined’. It is possible to influence this behavior by manipulating tcp.established in pf.conf, but I don’t think this is what you want. > 16 aug. 2017 kl. 10:05 skrev Mischa Peters : > >

Re: relayd l7 loadbalancing

On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 10:27:58AM +0200, Maxim Bourmistrov wrote: > > Once connection is established, state is created in PF. Subsequent requests > will be ???pipelined???. > It is possible to influence this behavior by manipulating tcp.established in > pf.conf, > but I don???t think this is

relayd l7 loadbalancing

Hi All, I have somewhat the following config for relayd running on 6.1. And I am trying to forward certain request paths to different hosts. table { xx.xx.xx.131 } table { xx.xx.xx.31 } http protocol httpsfilter { match request header remove "Proxy" match request header append

Re: Getting Dell RAID status via SNMP

Sorry have not been checking in for a while - will definitely try the patches suggested. It may take a few weeks though to fit with our internal processes. I will report back - thanks On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 10:33 PM, FUKAUMI Naoki wrote: > Hi, > > From: Andrew Daugherity

Re: relayd l7 loadbalancing

> On 16 Aug 2017, at 10:41, Claudio Jeker wrote: > On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 10:27:58AM +0200, Maxim Bourmistrov wrote: >> >> Once connection is established, state is created in PF. Subsequent requests >> will be ???pipelined???. >> It is possible to influence this

vmm workflow

Howdy. I've been playing around with vmm(4) on 6.1 and have noticed a few things that seem odd. Take the following vm.conf: ramdisk="/home/los/vmm/bsd.rd-current" switch "local" { add vether0 } vm "test.vm" { boot $ramdisk disable owner los memory 2G disk

OpenBSD-based ISP

Hello everyone! I'm relative new using OpenBSD, I have just 4 years using this OS for dhcp servers. Today I have the mission of implement this OS in a cablemodem headend, in my first try I get negative results with this rules: *pass all flags S/SA* *#LAN* *match out log on bge0 inet from

Re: OpenBSD-based ISP

Thanks James, now I'm trying with 3K customers and 1M states. I will comments my results to the list when a finish. Guillermo. On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 4:01 PM, James Shupe wrote: > Have you raised states? 10K is the default I believe, the most likely > culprit. > > On

Re: OpenBSD-based ISP

Just some more pointers? Please correct me if I am saying some thing wrong. Maybe also good to look at cpu interupts. I'me not sure how good if_bge today are. I found them in the past "slowly" eating interrupts when passing lot of small sized traffic. How is your avarage packet size? I could

Using USB headsets

Hi, I'm trying to figure out how to get my USB headset (Plantronics C310) to work. I can't hear anything, nor does the microphone work. I fiddled with different mixerctl settings to no avail, and I'm not even sure my headset had been detected at all, as the available options to set don't change,

Re: OpenBSD-based ISP

Have you raised states? 10K is the default I believe, the most likely culprit. On 8/16/2017 12:55 PM, Juan Guillermo Narvaez wrote: > Hello everyone! > > I'm relative new using OpenBSD, I have just 4 years using this OS for dhcp > servers. > Today I have the mission of implement this OS in a

Re: OpenBSD-based ISP

On 16.8.2017. 19:55, Juan Guillermo Narvaez wrote: > Hello everyone! > > I'm relative new using OpenBSD, I have just 4 years using this OS for dhcp > servers. > Today I have the mission of implement this OS in a cablemodem headend, in > my first try I get negative results with this rules: > >