Even X10 can be upgraded to get in html5.
> 21 dec. 2017 kl. 06:50 skrev kasak :
>
>
>> 21 дек. 2017 г., в 0:03, Chris Bennett
>> написал(а):
>>
>> I found a new server that uses IPMI and offers using it
>> to setup your own custom OS.
Hi,
I am running ~ current on amd64 (dmesg attached) and am experiencing
vmd crashes. The processes responsible for operating the VMs are
disappearing and I get the following messages in deamon:
Dec 20 12:26:32 stanislas vmd[38693]: vcpu_run_loop: vm 14 / vcpu 0 run ioctl
failed:
On Mon, 18 Dec 2017 15:05:53 -0800
Kai Wetlesen wrote:
> [...]
> [...]
> [...]
> [...]
>
> There are many decisions that would need to be made that will piss
> somebody off. Decisions like what software/platform to use, where to
> host the thing, and how much the
> 21 дек. 2017 г., в 12:16, Maxim Bourmistrov
> написал(а):
>
>
> Even X10 can be upgraded to get in html5.
>
>> 21 dec. 2017 kl. 06:50 skrev kasak :
>>
>>
>>> 21 дек. 2017 г., в 0:03, Chris Bennett
>>>
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 01:59:24PM -0700, LD wrote:
> Trying to send accented characters using OpenBSD's (v5.9) email server I get
> a "501 5.1.3: Recipient address syntax error" because the local part of the
> address has an "??" ("e" with an acute accent) in the name. Does OpenSMTPD
> support
Hi guys,
I got the apu2b4 to build a wifi router with an Intel Dual Band
Wireless AC 7260 wifi module. The module firmware was loaded by
fw_update at first boot and connecting to my existing AP works but when
I try to set it up as an access point with:
ifconfig iwm0 up media autoselect mediaopt
George wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I got the apu2b4 to build a wifi router with an Intel Dual Band
> Wireless AC 7260 wifi module. The module firmware was loaded by
> fw_update at first boot and connecting to my existing AP works but when
>
> I try to set it up as an access
6.2-stable is NOT STABLE.
Backport, backport,backport.
6.2-stable is a beta release.
This is what its IS.
5.9 vs. 6.2 - last one is a major downwards.
I know a lot of stuff done in tcp/ip stack and this is a good job (abt time to
ack SMP), but
Keep those changes in beta, don’t tell ”we have
On 2017/12/21 23:20, Maxim Bourmistrov wrote:
>
> Fixed in HEAD?! - my ass. Whom puts HEAD into prod?! Not me any more, that's
> for sure.
> IS LIKE DROPPING A TURBO ENGINE INTO A CAR WITH NO WHEELS.
>
> I can dig into this as much as I want/like ON MY OWN TIME.
> But if MONEY are on the
Solved?1
What abt OPTIONS in relay_http.c ?
Solved?
Maybe in HEAD.(?)
I have to hand-rolle this in src for 6.2 to have it working.
—> toread=0;
You know.
//mxb
> 21 dec. 2017 kl. 22:40 skrev Janne Johansson :
>
> 2017-12-21 21:58 GMT+01:00 Maxim Bourmistrov
Fixed in HEAD?! - my ass. Whom puts HEAD into prod?! Not me any more, that's
for sure.
IS LIKE DROPPING A TURBO ENGINE INTO A CAR WITH NO WHEELS.
I can dig into this as much as I want/like ON MY OWN TIME.
But if MONEY are on the table…….
I think I’ll revert to 5.9 all of it.
//mxb
> 21 dec.
Hi, I'm curious if there's a more concise/preferred way to accomplish the
below. I'm hosting a number of sites that want to prefer https over http
and strip any www subdomain from urls.
E.g.
www.foo.com/* -> https://foo.com/*
https://www.foo.com/* -> https://foo.com/*
I have this working (used
Yepp.
I have
bios0: Supermicro X10DRT-PT
With latest IPMI firmware and have html5.
> 21 dec. 2017 kl. 12:00 skrev kasak :
>
>
>> 21 дек. 2017 г., в 12:16, Maxim Bourmistrov
>> написал(а):
>>
>>
>> Even X10 can be upgraded to get in html5.
>>
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: Solved IPMI, but I can't get onto network to outside
> From: Scott Nicholas
> Date: Thu, December 21, 2017 2:41 pm
> To: Chris Bennett
> Cc: ed...@pettijohn-web.com, misc@openbsd.org
Sorry, but I have to say
Releases after 5.9 are NOT production stable.
(Until all bugs are smashed within stack changes and SMP unlock).
After 5.9 - cost money and effort.
MONEY.
//mxb
> 21 dec. 2017 kl. 20:29 skrev Maxim Bourmistrov :
>
> Hey,
> After upgrading from
switched to em1, no problem.
em0 is clearly defective.
Thanks for the help!
Chris Bennett
I had to bypass relayd to roll prod stable.
Down to apache. Taking care of http and https.
By redirect.
Now this setup (if I can call it) is stable.
.
P.S.
Looks like we have to move forward from here.
> 21 dec. 2017 kl. 21:58 skrev Maxim Bourmistrov :
>
>
> Sorry,
On Thu, December 14, 2017 3:14 am, x9p wrote:
>
...
> x9p | PGP : 0x03B50AF5EA4C8D80 / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF DDCC 0DFA 74AE
> 1524 E7EE
>
>
mail sent to the ones who sent me the address. still lots of stickers to send.
cheers.
--
x9p | PGP : 0x03B50AF5EA4C8D80 / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: IPMI still requires Java! I'm screwed.
> From: "Alceu R. de Freitas Jr."
> Date: Thu, December 21, 2017 11:04 am
> To: misc@openbsd.org
>
>
> I'm a bit late to answer, but maybe you could check with the
On Thu, December 21, 2017 1:22 pm, Robert Blacquiere wrote:
...
> You could also try running linux in vm with icedtea-Web plugin for
> firefox on linux. That seems to work with older SuperMicro machines
> without much issues. Also the bundled IPMIviewer for linux works fine.
> The main issue is
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 08:36:19AM +, Olivier Cherrier wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am running ~ current on amd64 (dmesg attached) and am experiencing
> vmd crashes. The processes responsible for operating the VMs are
> disappearing and I get the following messages in deamon:
>
> Dec 20
OK, I've not had this setup before and I can't get it
to work. I am not sure what to move or which commands
to use to investigate. I.E. I don't know how to
interpret what I see from them.
I got this from support:
I have checked the prefix routing and I dont see any issue with
networking.
You
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 08:50:02AM +0300, kasak wrote:
> >
> Look at the newest servers with aspeed ast2500, such as supermicro x11
> platforms, they are manageable through html5. If you still need to manage
> your server try jdk-1.8.0.144v0.tgz package from ports
>
You could also try running
I'm a bit late to answer, but maybe you could check with the manufacturer?
Java applets are gone... Oracle will not support them anymore due security
issues, so maybe the manufacturer could give you a hand on this.
If they don't, maybe you could try some reverse engineering? Unless the
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: Solved IPMI, but I can't get onto network to outside
> From: "Chris Bennett"
> Date: Thu, December 21, 2017 1:52 pm
> To: ed...@pettijohn-web.com
> Cc: misc@openbsd.org
>
>
> > Original Message
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 12:52:33PM -0700, Chris Bennett wrote:
> > > IP: 104.217.196.248/29
> > > Gateway: 104.217.196.249
> > > Netmask: 255.255.255.248
> > >
> >
> > What is your network interface?
> >
>
> I have two, em0 and em1
>
> em0:
> inet 104.217.196.248 255.255.255.248
>
> And I
On Dec 21, 2017 2:58 PM, "Chris Bennett"
wrote:
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: Solved IPMI, but I can't get onto network to outside
> From: ed...@pettijohn-web.com
> Date: Thu, December 21, 2017 1:42 pm
> To: Chris Bennett
Hey,
After upgrading from 6.0-stable to 6.2-stable (syspatch) existing setup started
to hang.
As of burst of emails from me following is known:
Relayd is a main process to take CPU.
Also running ospfd and bgpd (for blocklist distrib)
With 6.0, relayd used to have two or more procs with high CPU
On Dec 21, 2017 12:57 PM, Chris Bennett
wrote:
>
> OK, I've not had this setup before and I can't get it
> to work. I am not sure what to move or which commands
> to use to investigate. I.E. I don't know how to
> interpret what I see from them.
>
> I got this
The first node out of two started to respond as soon as second one got reset.
I don’t see any saturation on the network stack.
"Netstat -m” shows 0 for mem denied.
Sysctl -a|grep ifq
or
Sysctl -a|grep drop
Shows 0 as well.
Whole thing looked like a tcp/ip stack hang.
//mxb
> 21 dec. 2017 kl.
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: Solved IPMI, but I can't get onto network to outside
> From: ed...@pettijohn-web.com
> Date: Thu, December 21, 2017 1:42 pm
> To: Chris Bennett
> Cc: misc@openbsd.org
>
>
> On Dec 21, 2017 12:57 PM, Chris
31 matches
Mail list logo