On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 8:16 PM Cord wrote:
>
> "Second time" of my title means:
> Install first time openbsd desktop --> ssh key stealing --> hacked -->
> wipe and reinstall
> Install second time openbsd desktop --> not my webmail session opened -->
> maybe hacked --> wipe and reinstall
I
Hi misc@!
I was wondering if I could use some budget solution to access my OpenBSD
machine via its serial console over the network, and I stumbled upon
this piece of hardware: [1] [2] [3] (the same device "USR-TCP232-302",
I'm just not sure which one will be up at the time someone looks at
them)
Hi,
On InfluxDB, I'm getting "panic:runtime error: index out of range" every
time I run the "SHOW TAG VALUES FROM unbound WITH KEY = clientip WHERE
sysName =~ /$hostname/" query from Grafana. And I also get it using the
influx shell.
I've tried various things, like giving more resources (via
On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 13:58:27 +0200, Joel Carnat wrote:
> On a fresh influxdb instance in an OpenBSD VM: same issue. On a
> fresh influxdb instance in a Linux Ubuntu VM: the error disappears and
> the query gets the correct answers.
Did you install the exact same influxdb version on Linux?
I
On Mon 08/04 09:00, Daniel Jakots wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 13:58:27 +0200, Joel Carnat wrote:
>
> > On a fresh influxdb instance in an OpenBSD VM: same issue. On a
> > fresh influxdb instance in a Linux Ubuntu VM: the error disappears and
> > the query gets the correct answers.
>
> Did you
Daniel,
Ethernet to serial is normally done using ppp [1].
Why add unneeded hardware.
Do you have RJ45 or RS232 on the OpenBSD machine already?
Joseph
[1] http://man.openbsd.org/ppp
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Tuesday, April 9, 2019 12:04 AM, LÉVAI Dániel wrote:
> Hi misc@!
>
> I
I have a somewhat similar device and works without issues. However, it
has a serious backdraw: it provides no way of securing the comms
channel: any TCP/UDP is open text. Should you need to use such a
device in the wild, take that into account.
Regards!
El lun., 8 abr. 2019 a las 18:07, LÉVAI
Hello LÉVAI Dániel,
If I understand you correctly you want a serial server
you could use something like a PCengines apuc2. running OpenBSD
that would work ok, as a serial console box thjat would liekly set you
back about 150 euro ... which is good value considering what you get
or if security
Anatoli [m...@anatoli.ws] wrote:
>
> I've seen extremely slow HDD performance in OpenBSD, like 12x slower than on
> Linux, also no filesystem cache, so depending on your HDD with scp you may
> be hitting the max throughput for the FS, not the network.
>
12x slower? That's insane. What are you
Hi,
I guess you're hitting 2 bottlenecks: the CPU performance for iperf and
HDD performance for scp.
Check how much CPU is consumed during iperf transfer and try scp'ing
something not from/to HDD, e.g. /dev/zero.
I've seen extremely slow HDD performance in OpenBSD, like 12x slower
than on
I read the thread on tech@ , for an old network admin this is awesome info.
thanks
On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 10:42 PM David Gwynne wrote:
> OK. I made a start on this. Have a look for "sfp module info and diagnostics"
> on tech@, or click on https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech=155469738013008=2
>
>
On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 5:21 PM Mark Schneider
wrote:
> Short feedback:
>
> Just for the test I have checked the 10GBit network performance
> between two FreeBSD 13.0 servers (both HP DL380g7 machines)
> transfering data in both directions
>
> # ---
> ironm@fbsdsrv2:~ $ scp
Hello, I am seeing some BGP VPNv4 routes staying populated in
the RIB of route-reflector clients even after dropping the originating neighbor.
I'm on OpenBSD 6.4, running MPLS L3VPN.
I have 2 IBGP route-reflectors, both OpenBSD 6.4.
I run OSPF to distribute Loopbacks into an Area (100)
We run
On 04/08/19 17:46, Anatoli wrote:
That was with Samsung 960 EVO U.2 (PCIe) on i7-8550u with 32GB RAM.
OpenBSD read/write was around 220-240MB/s (with FS encryption), Linux
without FS cache about 2.6-2.8GB/s and with cache over 3.5GB/s.
I don't have a dmesg right now as I installed Gentoo
On Tuesday, April 9, 2019 3:28 AM, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> Anatoli [m...@anatoli.ws] wrote:
> > I've seen extremely slow HDD performance in OpenBSD, like 12x slower than on
> > Linux, also no filesystem cache, so depending on your HDD with scp you may
> > be hitting the max throughput for the
Hi Duncan,
Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote on Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 05:53:31PM -0600:
> One of the significant reasons behind my own espousal of open systems has
> had to do with my reading of the Microsoft EULA and subsequent concerns over
> the ownership of data stored. It would appear that
Hi Henry,
How long are you leaving the sessions down for on the PE router ?
are you leaving the sessions down past the hold time value on the neigbour
of the router that you are shutting down.
are you doing a graceful shutdown?
or are you simply rebooting the neigbour
if im not mistaken I dont
On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 2:34 AM Tom Smyth wrote:
>
> Hello LÉVAI Dániel,
> If I understand you correctly you want a serial server
>
> you could use something like a PCengines apuc2. running OpenBSD
> that would work ok, as a serial console box thjat would liekly set you
> back about 150 euro ...
I have one of these, but I really only use it to connect the old VIC-20 to BBS
systems. It works alright, but it's a bit funky in it's implementation. As
others have said, it's completely plaintext; everything is sent in the clear.
You'd be telnetting (not ssh) into it. How much do you trust
So in today's case, I went into the Cisco BGP process and did a "neighbor
x.x.x.x shutdown"
>From there the OpenBSD route-reflector removed the routes from those
neighbors from the rib.
The other OpenBSD route-reflector clients however kept those routes around.
This was first noticed on Friday,
gwes [g...@oat.com] wrote:
>
> What is the rated transfer rate of the SSD you're using to test?
> SATA 3 wire speed is 6G/sec and realistically 500MB/sec raw rate
> is near the top.
>
> Anything over that is an artefact probably from a cache somewhere.
>
He's using NVMe with its own DRAM
One of the significant reasons behind my own espousal of open systems has
had to do with my reading of the Microsoft EULA and subsequent concerns over
the ownership of data stored. It would appear that these sort of issues
are starting to be considered in a wider context:
On top of this (and I don't know why, maybe because of softraid FS
encryption?) I haven't seen any effect of the FS cache for files of any
size (not even 128Mb) that is supposed to be using at least the 32-bit
mem (some percent of the first 4Gb,
On 04/08/19 19:29, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
gwes [g...@oat.com] wrote:
What is the rated transfer rate of the SSD you're using to test?
SATA 3 wire speed is 6G/sec and realistically 500MB/sec raw rate
is near the top.
Anything over that is an artefact probably from a cache somewhere.
He's
24 matches
Mail list logo
