Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> Our firewalls can't connecto to firmware.openbsd.org (by design).
Always a choice to make.
> Is there a way to mirror the contents of firmware.openbsd.org?
They are just web servers, so a wget will collect everything.
> It would be nice if these files were available
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 01:37:41PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Jason McIntyre wrote:
>
> > i don;t think we can (or should) attempt to police this.
>
> Ouch, that typo really triggered my ADD, let's hope you don't make
> similar errors in our manual pages.
Yep, let's stick to seperate or
30 May, 2019
Greetings OpenBSD aficionados,
As a newbie to OpenBSD, I am delighted to have the chance to interact
with the OpenBSD Mailing Lists community.
Since I am about to install OpenBSD 6.5 (amd64) on a USB Flash Drive for
the first time, I was wondering if anyone has a solution to the
> 30 May, 2019
>
> Greetings OpenBSD aficionados,
>
> As a newbie to OpenBSD, I am delighted to have the chance to interact
> with the OpenBSD Mailing Lists community.
> Since I am about to install OpenBSD 6.5 (amd64) on a USB Flash Drive for
>
> the first time, I was wondering if anyone has a
Our firewalls can't connecto to firmware.openbsd.org (by design).
Is there a way to mirror the contents of firmware.openbsd.org? It
would be nice if these files were available in the usual OpenBSD
mirrors, since we already mirror those and could just point fw_update
at our internal mirror host.
On 2019-05-30, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> i'm not sure is this intended or not, but if sndiod isn't running and if
> i want to open youtube video with firefox i got this log
> firefox[54192]: pledge "tty", syscall 54 and firefox crashes
> when sndiod is running everything seems
Hello,
I'm back again with spamd synchronisation.
I made further tests and it seems to me that only new entries in spamd are
synchronised.
All existing entries before the synchronisation and not sent to the other spamd
instance.
Is it supposed to work like that ?
Thank you
Le dimanche
Jason McIntyre wrote:
> i don;t think we can (or should) attempt to police this.
Ouch, that typo really triggered my ADD, let's hope you don't make
similar errors in our manual pages.
Hi all,
i'm not sure is this intended or not, but if sndiod isn't running and if
i want to open youtube video with firefox i got this log
firefox[54192]: pledge "tty", syscall 54 and firefox crashes
when sndiod is running everything seems fine ..
from kdump
70068 firefox CALL
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 10:41:39AM +0200, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> i'm not sure is this intended or not, but if sndiod isn't running and if
> i want to open youtube video with firefox i got this log
> firefox[54192]: pledge "tty", syscall 54 and firefox crashes
> when sndiod is
On 30.5.2019. 10:48, Solene Rapenne wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 10:41:39AM +0200, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> i'm not sure is this intended or not, but if sndiod isn't running and if
>> i want to open youtube video with firefox i got this log
>> firefox[54192]: pledge "tty",
firefox privilege seperation is very rough. The code was written as an
afterthought, and it clearly has many cases where processes perform
operations directly.
I expect the response will be to add pledge "audio" to permit those
ioctls, and in time the firefox processes will have essentially all
Hi Henry,
Henry Bonath wrote:
Here's my build info for 6.5 PowerPC:
pkg list:
autoconf--%2.13
dbus-glib--
g++--%4.9
gcc--%4.9
gmake--
python--%2.7
py-pip--
yasm--
unzip--
zip--
And my .mozconfig:
# This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public
# License, v. 2.0. If a
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 10:16:12PM +1000, Stephen Gregoratto wrote:
> When I'm writing new manpages, I like to draw inspiration from the
> documentation of similar programs. The problem is that many manpages
> have different ways of saying the same thing, probably due to their
> authors and time
When I'm writing new manpages, I like to draw inspiration from the
documentation of similar programs. The problem is that many manpages
have different ways of saying the same thing, probably due to their
authors and time period they were written in.
So, I'd like to ask what your preferred choice
Hi Jordan,
Jordan Geoghegan wrote:
If you're going down that path, you should see if you can get
TenFourFox to compile. TenFourFox does have a jit and supports altivec.
http://www.floodgap.com/software/tenfourfox/
https://github.com/classilla/tenfourfox
I do know, having contributed to
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 07:29:55PM +0100, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> i think any of man page, manual page, or manual is fine.
>
> > 2. Standard output
> >
> > Is it:
> > Print to standard output/error
> > tee(1)
> > Print to the standard output/error
> > cat(1), echo(1)
> > Print to
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 09:09:58PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 07:29:55PM +0100, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> > i think any of man page, manual page, or manual is fine.
> >
> > > 2. Standard output
> > >
> > > Is it:
> > > Print to standard output/error
> > > tee(1)
> > >
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 10:16:12PM +1000, Stephen Gregoratto wrote:
> When I'm writing new manpages, I like to draw inspiration from the
> documentation of similar programs. The problem is that many manpages
> have different ways of saying the same thing, probably due to their
> authors and time
19 matches
Mail list logo