Re: Home NAS

2019-11-14 Thread Eduardo Minguez Perez
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 3:29 PM Jan Betlach wrote: > > Hi guys, > > I am setting up a home NAS for five users. Total amount of data stored > on NAS will not exceed 5 TB. > Clients are Macs and OpenBSD machines, so that SSHFS works fine from > both (no need for NFS or Samba). > I am much more

aggr vs Nexus 3K

2019-11-14 Thread Szél Gábor
Dear @misc We want to try use aggr pseudo LACP device. We have a working setup with trunk interface: oBSD: hostname.trunk0 trunkproto lacp trunkport oce0 trunkport oce1 172.20.253.11 netmask 255.255.255.255 description "" trunk0: flags=8943 mtu 9000     lladdr 28:80:23:e0:ab:40

Patch suggestion for sysupgrade

2019-11-14 Thread Raimo Niskanen
The use case for this patch is that in our lab network we have NFS automounted /home/* directories, so using /home/_sysupgrade for sysupgrade does not work. With this patch it is easy to modify /usr/sbin/sysupgrade and change just the line SETSDIR=/home/_sysupgrade to point to some other local

Home NAS

2019-11-14 Thread Jan Betlach
Hi guys, I am setting up a home NAS for five users. Total amount of data stored on NAS will not exceed 5 TB. Clients are Macs and OpenBSD machines, so that SSHFS works fine from both (no need for NFS or Samba). I am much more familiar and comfortable with OpenBSD than with FreeBSD. My

Re: Home NAS

2019-11-14 Thread Raymond, David
I have done similar things on Linux for years and am now doing them on OpenBSD. Sounds like what you want to do can be done with a simple rsync script. OpenBSD ffs (ufs) should be stable, it has been around for decades in various incarnations. I have never noticed bit rot in this system, though

Re: aggr vs Nexus 3K

2019-11-14 Thread Szél Gábor
Sorry!, I was not attentive. in earlier oBSD versions, i think it was not necessary "up" in hostname.* configuration file when interface have IP address. if I add it to hostname.aggr0: trunkport oce0 trunkport oce1 172.20.253.12 netmask 255.255.255.255 description "." up LACP trunk is

Re: Home NAS

2019-11-14 Thread Roderick
On Thu, 14 Nov 2019, Jan Betlach wrote: Should I byte the bullet and build the NAS on FreeBSD taking advantage of ZFS, snapshots, replications, etc? Or is this an overkill? I built my "NAS" with FreeBSD due to the self healing properties of ZFS with checksums and redundant data, and due to

Re: Patch suggestion for sysupgrade

2019-11-14 Thread gilles
A similar patch for this was sent to tech@ by Renaud Allard, you might want to go review the "sysupgrade: Allow to use another directory for data sets" thread and comment it. November 14, 2019 3:01 PM, "Raimo Niskanen" wrote: > The use case for this patch is that in our lab network we have

Re: SPAM: Re: aggr vs Nexus 3K

2019-11-14 Thread Szél Gábor
Yes of course! :) if aggr up, Nexus suspend port channel: "not receiving any LACP BPDUs  suspending" If trunk up, nexus not suspend port channel. -- Üdvözlettel, Szél Gábor WanTax Kft. tel.: +36 20 3838 171 fax: +36 82 357 585 email: gabor.s...@wantax.hu web: http://wantax.hu

Re: Home NAS

2019-11-14 Thread Jon Tabor
I'm running a small home NAS on OpenBSD, in a very similar configuration as your intended configuration, right down to the rsync backup scripts. It's worked very well so far, though I've only had it in place for a bit over a year. I chose OpenBSD over FreeBSD due to being far more comfortable

Re: Home NAS

2019-11-14 Thread U'll Be King of the Stars
On 15/11/2019 04:45, Raymond, David wrote: I have done similar things on Linux for years and am now doing them on OpenBSD. Sounds like what you want to do can be done with a simple rsync script. OpenBSD ffs (ufs) should be stable, it has been around for decades in various incarnations. I have

Re: Home NAS

2019-11-14 Thread Raymond, David
Andrew, I hadn't heard about file corruption on OpenBSD. It would be good to get to the bottom of this if it occurred. Dave On 11/14/19, U'll Be King of the Stars wrote: > On 15/11/2019 04:45, Raymond, David wrote: >> I have done similar things on Linux for years and am now doing them on >>

Re: Home NAS

2019-11-14 Thread Andrew Luke Nesbit
Hi Dave, On 15/11/2019 07:44, Raymond, David wrote: I hadn't heard about file corruption on OpenBSD. It would be good to get to the bottom of this if it occurred. I was surprised when I read mention of it too, without any real claim or detailed analysis to back it up. This is why I added

Re: Home NAS

2019-11-14 Thread gwes
On 11/14/19 3:52 PM, Andrew Luke Nesbit wrote: Hi Dave, On 15/11/2019 07:44, Raymond, David wrote: I hadn't heard about file corruption on OpenBSD.  It would be good to get to the bottom of this if it occurred. I was surprised when I read mention of it too, without any real claim or

Re: Redraw of terminal change in 6.6?

2019-11-14 Thread Hiltjo Posthuma
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 03:00:05PM +0100, Mischa wrote: > > On 4 Nov 2019, at 16:51, Mischa wrote: > >> On 2 Nov 2019, at 15:19, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote: > >> On Sat, Nov 02, 2019 at 08:32:50AM +0100, Mischa wrote: > >>> Hi All, > >>> > >>> Not sure if this is on my side, setting, or if something

Re: Patch suggestion for sysupgrade

2019-11-14 Thread NilsOla Nilsson
I have upgraded a machine where /home was NFS-mounted, like this: - check that the / partition has space for the files that will populate /home/_sysupgrade - unmount /home - comment ut the /home line in /etc/fstab - upgrade with sysupgrade - restore the line in /etc/fstab - mount -a All this

Re: OpenIKED: IPv4 traffic over IPv6 tunnel

2019-11-14 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2019-11-14, Pulz, Joerg wrote: > > IKEv2 tunnel using OpenIKED between the external IPv6 addresses of both sites. > IPv4 networks of Site-A should be able to communicate with the IPv4 > network of Site-B and the other way round through the IKEv2 tunnel. > > > The actual state: > > The IKEv2

Re: pfsync on VLAN - supported ?

2019-11-14 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2019-11-13, Chris Cappuccio wrote: > Rachel Roch [rr...@tutanota.de] wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Both the man page and FAQ (https://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/carp.html) >> talk about "physical interface" >> in relation to the syncdev parameter. >> >> Does

Re: [OpenIKED] Network traffic over VPN site-to-site tunnel stalls few times a day

2019-11-14 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2019-11-13, radek wrote: > After upgrading my two endpoints to i386/6.6 it started to work flawlessly. > There wasn't even one IKED restart within first two days of running. > Thank you Patrick, Stuart and everyone involved in making IKED work as > expected. I really appreciate it. Thanks

Re: urtwn(4) gets wedged periodically

2019-11-14 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 12:30:23PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote: > These are usb devices. There are multiple usb bus drivers, with > usb2 and usb3 variations, and the usb subsystem itself. The mailing > lists are full of discussions of bugs in usb. > > But no, let's keep concluding these problems

Re: Questions regarding unwind.conf (block list)

2019-11-14 Thread Raf Czlonka
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 11:14:11PM GMT, Felix Maschek wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using unwind for a time and it is running perfect for me. > > Now with the upcoming new plugin api of chrome with limited support for > uBlock I'm looking for an alternative. > > Unfortunately I'm not able to specify a

Re: syspatch -c (amd64) ftp: connect: Permission denied

2019-11-14 Thread Dimitrios Moustos
Hello Strahil, I get this very often when pf does not allow traffic out. First check that pf allows traffic out. Hope it helps, Dimitrios On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 10:51:45PM +, Strahil Nikolov wrote: > Hello Community, > > it seems that syspatch and pkg_add are having an issue with 'ftp:

Re: syspatch -c (amd64) ftp: connect: Permission denied

2019-11-14 Thread Strahil Nikolov
On November 14, 2019 11:04:15 AM GMT+02:00, Dimitrios Moustos wrote: >Hello Strahil, > >I get this very often when pf does not allow traffic out. >First check that pf allows traffic out. > >Hope it helps, Dimitrios > >On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 10:51:45PM +, Strahil Nikolov wrote: >> Hello

OpenIKED: IPv4 traffic over IPv6 tunnel

2019-11-14 Thread Pulz, Joerg
Hi, I'm trying to connect IPv4 networks over an IPv6 tunnel using OpenIKED without success. Here a short overview: Site-A: - several IPv4 networks - OpenIKED (OpenBSD 6.5) on a multihomed host, internal IPv4 address, external IPv6 address Site-B: - one IPv4 network - Cisco something

Re: urtwn(4) gets wedged periodically

2019-11-14 Thread Roderick
On Wed, 13 Nov 2019, Theo de Raadt wrote: The mailing lists are full of discussions of bugs in usb. This could explain, why devices that have problems in OpenBSD have no problem in FreeBSD, although they ported the driver from OpenBSD. But no, let's keep concluding these problems is

Re: pfsync on VLAN - supported ?

2019-11-14 Thread Markus Wernig
On 14.11.2019 11:30, Rachel Roch wrote: >>> Does this mean Bad Things (TM) will happen if I try to use a dedicated vlan >>> interface for pfsync ? I have had pfsync running happily over a vlan interface for years, never a problem. > Regarding the extra port, in my case I'm using that for LACP

Re: pfsync on VLAN - supported ?

2019-11-14 Thread Rachel Roch
13 Nov 2019, 20:21 by ch...@nmedia.net: > Rachel Roch [rr...@tutanota.de] wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Both the man page and FAQ (https://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/carp.html) >> talk about "physical interface" >> in relation to the syncdev parameter. >> >>

Re: random packet drops with syncookies/synproxy

2019-11-14 Thread Markus Wernig
On 09.11.2019 15:24, Claudio Jeker wrote: >> So nobody is using syncookies/synproxy at all? > > I guess that is a reasonably safe assumption. syncookies are rather new > and probably need more battle testing. OK, then I will send a bug report. > synproxy never helped me much in > case of a SYN

Re: pfsync on VLAN - supported ?

2019-11-14 Thread Rachel Roch
14 Nov 2019, 11:21 by liste...@wernig.net: > On 14.11.2019 11:30, Rachel Roch wrote: > Does this mean Bad Things (TM) will happen if I try to use a dedicated vlan interface for pfsync ? > I have had pfsync running happily over a vlan interface for years, never > a problem. >