Hey, guys.
I always used the rt_tableid_max expanded to 16 bit range in past releases
5.x and after rebuilding the kernel it worked immediately.
But now I installed 6.6 on the new system, and after changing
rt_tableid_max (and new rt_tableid_mask and bits values too), my whole
userland throw an rt
Mihai Popescu @ 2020-05-16 20:24 IST:
> I tried UEFI/GPT but things went wrong and I was not able to boot OpenBSD's
> kernel after install.
Check if you are actually booting into UEFI mode, both during & after
installation.
> Is there any penalty using BIOS/MBR versus UEFI/GPT?
> Are there any
Hi,
I've noticed some weird behavior of the setsockopt(2) system call.
Given the following little test program ...
#include
#include
#include
int
main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
int fd[2];
We supply source code, so this took under 60 seconds to find:
SO_RCVTIMEO is in uipc_socket.c
memcpy(&tv, mtod(m, struct timeval *), sizeof tv);
if (!timerisvalid(&tv))
return (EINVAL);
nsecs =
I've misinterpreted the situation.
Previous to 6.7, and probably in most other operating systems, this
was limited to 65535 / 100 or 644.
But now the range is extended. Wait about 3 days, upgrade, etc.
Theo de Raadt wrote:
> We supply source code, so this took under 60 seconds to find:
>
>
Hi Alex,
Alex Naumov wrote on Wed, May 13, 2020 at 01:10:47PM +0200:
> since rpki-client has its own home page like other "associated projects",
> it makes sense to add a new link.
Committed with a tweak; i put it next to OpenBGPD.
Thanks for the suggestion,
Ingo
> Index: index.html
> =
it seems the things work just when i rebuild userland completely (im pretty
sure i did it only with compiling kernel in past, correct me if i wrong?).
btw, questions for the Devs.
Looking at the cvs history, i really worried that you do not expand
rt_tableid_max limit for the years, moreover now i
Hi,
rebound(8) was remove in January, but I don't see an entry in
plus67.html or 67.html.
Should it be mentioned in either one these pages?
https://www.openbsd.org/plus67.html
https://www.openbsd.org/faq/current.html
thanks,
j.b.
I'm trying to set a longer timeout on a udp state, and for some reason it
seems to be disappearing before the expiration 8-/.
There are 3 rules involved:
pass in quick on vlan110 proto udp from any to port = 9430 tag VOIP_UDP keep
state (udp.multiple 360)
pass out quick on $ext_if proto udp tag
9 matches
Mail list logo
