On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 05:59:37PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 04:59:22PM +0100, Mischa wrote:
>
> > On 14 Nov at 15:54, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > > On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 03:13:57PM +0100, Leo Unglaub wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hey,
> > > > my largest filesystem with OpenBS
Hi Stuart,
thank you for your help!
Now it works (almost).
The matter here was that login.conf limits were not high enough.
With my server configuration seafile client opens ~ 43000 files: I
really didn't expect such an high limit, so I set it to 8192 in login.conf.
Now it works, but it def
On 15 Nov at 13:04, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 05:59:37PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 04:59:22PM +0100, Mischa wrote:
> >
> > > On 14 Nov at 15:54, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 03:13:57PM +0100, Leo Unglaub wrote:
> > > >
On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 02:14:47PM +0100, Mischa wrote:
> On 15 Nov at 13:04, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 05:59:37PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 04:59:22PM +0100, Mischa wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 14 Nov at 15:54, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > > >
On 15 Nov at 14:25, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 02:14:47PM +0100, Mischa wrote:
>
> > On 15 Nov at 13:04, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > > On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 05:59:37PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 04:59:22PM +0100, Mischa wrote:
> > > >
>
Hi Stuart,
thank you for your help!
Now it works (almost).
The matter here was that login.conf limits were not high enough.
With my server configuration seafile client opens ~ 43000 files: I
really didn't expect such an high limit, so I set it to 8192 in login.conf.
Now it works, but it def
On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 02:43:03PM +0100, Mischa wrote:
> On 15 Nov at 14:25, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 02:14:47PM +0100, Mischa wrote:
> >
> > > On 15 Nov at 13:04, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 05:59:37PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > > >
> > >
On 15 Nov at 14:52, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 02:43:03PM +0100, Mischa wrote:
>
> > On 15 Nov at 14:25, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > > On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 02:14:47PM +0100, Mischa wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 15 Nov at 13:04, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > > > > On Sat, Nov 14, 2020
Hello,
I have linked dhcpd(8) and pf(4) using -A, -C and -L dhcpd flags.
It seems dhcpd only adds IP for dynamic leases and not for leases
configured using fixed-address.
Is this expected or is there something I misconfigured?
Thanks,
Jo
PS: configuration extracts
rc.conf.local:
dhcpd_flags=-A
On 2020-11-15, Joel Carnat wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have linked dhcpd(8) and pf(4) using -A, -C and -L dhcpd flags.
> It seems dhcpd only adds IP for dynamic leases and not for leases
> configured using fixed-address.
>
> Is this expected or is there something I misconfigured?
To my mind it's expect
Hi,
I would like to run OpenBSD as stated on the subject - I have been able,
however, to run it successfully with "-cpu Opteron_G2-v1", but I would
rather use "-cpu host" instead. Also note that on an Intel host, OpenBSD
appears to work successfully on the same Linux base.
qemu invocation th
So, here is what I discovered so far.
1. private ca: apparently everything works fine if you append your
private ca to /etc/ssl/cert.pem. If somebody has an alternative which
does not involve modifying stock cert.pem, please let me know;
2. seafile client syncs files only if auto update is di
Hi all,
in hostname.vlan11, I have:
- - -
vnetid 11 parent em3
inet 172.16.11.1 255.255.255.0 NONE
- - -
in hostname.vlan12, I have:
- - -
vnetid 12 parent em3
inet 172.16.12.1 255.255.255.0 NONE
- - -
but dhcpd logs:
- - -
DHCPOFFER on 172.16.11.106 to d6:b5:e4:2a:3a:1c via vlan12
- - -
What is
On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 8:59 AM Mischa wrote:
> On 15 Nov at 14:52, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > fsck wil get slower once you start filling it, but since your original
> > fs had about 104k files it expect it not getting too bad. If the speed
> > for your usecase is good as well I guess you should b
On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 02:57:49PM -0500, Kenneth Gober wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 8:59 AM Mischa wrote:
>
> > On 15 Nov at 14:52, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > > fsck wil get slower once you start filling it, but since your original
> > > fs had about 104k files it expect it not getting too b
Hello,
In the scenario of building a router with APU4, one interface is for wan,
the rest of three are free to use.
What is the most sane and performance wise ( CPU load, interface load,
etc.) way to tie together the remaining three interfaces as a switch, and
avoid using one IP class per interfac
On 11/15/20 12:25 PM, Mihai Popescu wrote:
Hello,
In the scenario of building a router with APU4, one interface is for wan,
the rest of three are free to use.
What is the most sane and performance wise ( CPU load, interface load,
etc.) way to tie together the remaining three interfaces as a s
> What is wrong here?
You show info about vlans then suddenly complain about non working dhcpd.
Hint: show some dhcpd configs.
After all these years of trouble-free upgrades, I ran into my first
problem. I used sysupgrade to go from 6.6/amd64 to 6.7. The upgrade
process was successful, but after bsd.upgrade did its thing and
rebooted the system, the new kernel would not boot.
It got to the "boot>" prompt, started loading
On 15/11/2020 20:14, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
(pay attention to "-kvmclock-stable-bit" otherwise it will crash into a
ddb debug shell)
Thank you very much for the idea; sadly, it didn't work, must be
something else!
Maxim Khitrov wrote:
> After all these years of trouble-free upgrades, I ran into my first
> problem. I used sysupgrade to go from 6.6/amd64 to 6.7. The upgrade
> process was successful, but after bsd.upgrade did its thing and
> rebooted the system, the new kernel would not boot.
>
> It got to t
On 15/11/2020 18:20, Gabriel Garcia wrote:
Hi,
I would like to run OpenBSD as stated on the subject - I have been able,
however, to run it successfully with "-cpu Opteron_G2-v1", but I would
rather use "-cpu host" instead. Also note that on an Intel host, OpenBSD
appears to work successfully
I’ve been a long time user of OpenBSD, but this is the first time I’m trying to
setup a VPN. I’m not sure what I’m doing wrong, or what should be the next step
to troubleshoot. I’ve probably reviewed every IKEv2 how-to I can find.
I need to end up with a configuration that will support several s
On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 06:20:52PM +, Gabriel Garcia wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to run OpenBSD as stated on the subject - I have been able,
> however, to run it successfully with "-cpu Opteron_G2-v1", but I would
> rather use "-cpu host" instead. Also note that on an Intel host, OpenBSD
> a
On 15.11.2020 19:20, Gabriel Garcia wrote:
Hi,
I would like to run OpenBSD as stated on the subject - I have been
able, however, to run it successfully with "-cpu Opteron_G2-v1", but I
would rather use "-cpu host" instead. Also note that on an Intel host,
OpenBSD appears to work successfully
I just updated one of my servers running 6.7 to 6.8, and am having a
problem with openldap. I have the intermediate cert and root CA in a
file referenced by the openldap config:
TLSCACertificateFile/etc/openldap/cabundle.crt
Under 6.7 with the openldap port from that version, this results in
Hi folks,
would it be possible to support address lists in iked.conf(5),
similar to ipsec.conf(5)?
Regards
Harri
0
C Turkey
P
T Istanbul
Z 34330
O Consultant
I Emre Kal
A Levent, Besiktas
M e...@tuta.io
U
B
X
N OpenBSD consulting and support. Experienced in OpenBSD httpd, relayd and
Packet Filter (PF).
28 matches
Mail list logo
