On 9/16/05, BadMagic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I installed OpenBSD 3.7 (Sparc64) on my Ultra 5 and it's performance is not
what I'd expected. I'd recently had Solaris on there (using CDE) and it ran
quite quickly but with OpenBSD, when I do an 'ls -la', it takes forever for
the
On Jan 14, 2008 11:52 AM, Andreas Kahari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way of limiting the amount of CPU given to a particular
process or process group? For example, I would want the build of the
qt4 port to use a maximum of 25% of the available CPU, leaving the CPU
75% idle if
On Jan 14, 2008 1:30 PM, Andreas Kahari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 14/01/2008, Alexander Schrijver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 14, 2008 11:52 AM, Andreas Kahari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way of limiting the amount of CPU given to a particular
process or process
On Jan 14, 2008 2:34 PM, Andreas Kahari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 14/01/2008, Alexander Schrijver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 14, 2008 1:30 PM, Andreas Kahari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 14/01/2008, Alexander Schrijver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 14, 2008 11:52 AM, Andreas
openldap includes are installed in /usr/local/include/ and libraries
in /usr/local/lib/.
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Comhte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks but that doesn't help me, could you explain please ?
Alexander Schrijver a icrit :
openldap includes are installed in /usr/local/include/ and libraries
in /usr/local/lib/.
I dont know how autoconf works which
sed 's/$OLD/$NEW/' $file -I know this will only
search and replace but how do I do in in-place so that the file itself is
modified.*
sed -a 's/old/new/wfilename' filename
It is explained in:
cd /usr/share/doc/usd/15.sed/; make paper.txt; less paper.txt
Why dont you use
Who needs god? We have daemon(3).
IIRC privoxy does what you want.
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 2:18 PM, macintoshzoom
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How to HIDE OpenBSD as user-agent?
For security reasons it is sometimes interesting to hide GLOBALLLY th
O.S. you are running on AGAINST GIVING ANY CLUE TO HACKERS ABOUT HOW TO
ATTACK
Write your own TCP/IP stack. But please read all the other replies
before you do so.
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 6:30 PM, macintoshzoom
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
seen some pf.conf settings against remote OS detection at
http://nmap.org/misc/defeat-nmap-osdetect.html#OPENBSD:
The OpenBSD packet
On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 09:38:01PM +1000, Sunnz wrote:
2008/4/30 macintoshzoom [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# block nmap OS detection scans somewhat (-O)
block in quick proto tcp flags FUP/WEUAPRSF
block in quick proto tcp flags WEUAPRSF/WEUAPRSF
block in quick proto tcp flags
Real men use butterflies.
On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 02:15:19PM -0400, bofh wrote:
Real men use ed.
On 5/3/08, Jordi Espasa Clofent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I know, it's completely a dumb question; but I'm curious about it.
I'm just learning C applied in networking area and I
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 08:21:10PM +0100, Andr?? S. wrote:
Am I missing something?
Is your user in the staff class? It has ignorenologin set by default. See
login.conf(5) and /etc/login.conf.
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 08:26:50AM +1000, Rod Whitworth wrote:
Better tha
iptables?
http://www.esecurityplanet.com/news/article.php/3934151/Fedora-15-Boosts
-Linux-Security.htm
maybe...
Imagine the dynamic firewall technology in the cloud!
For starters, there is 100% consensus among developers that we'll never
use newfangled overengineered stuff like System V init.
You mean Upstart!
or wait
You mean systemd!
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 02:42:04PM +1000, john slee wrote:
VROOOM
cars, meh.
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 01:16:38AM -0400, Casey Allen Shobe wrote:
On Tuesday 22 June 2010 11:11:59 pm you wrote:
I use gmail and I filter on:
Matches: to:(misc@openbsd.org)
A mail that is sent to misc@openbsd.org, and CC to my personal address,
should
have the mailing list copy
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 02:36:41AM -0400, Casey Allen Shobe wrote:
On Wednesday 23 June 2010 02:10:56 am Alexander Schrijver wrote:
I use the Sender: header.
How is it that you manage to filter on that in gmail? Because it's not
documented anywhere that I can find, and the only
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 01:07:12AM +0200, Mateusz Gierblinski wrote:
I'm just wondering. Where are you OpenBSD users from?
The Netherlands!
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 05:45:22PM +, Internet Retard wrote:
Wow... just wow... that is slick and *so* simple! Just like OpenBSD.
So you sent that tinyurl link to the email account created by the imaginary,
anonymous, disgruntled OpenBSD developers and the person who created the
account
Absolutely, the U.S. Navy will know precisely where you are if you use
TOR, but no one else will.
Sincerely,
IR
I meant that your IP address isn't the only thing you should try to hide.
There are a lot of very noisy protocols which can give your location or
identity away.
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 04:18:08AM -0400, bsdmas...@hushmail.com wrote:
FTP server down, amd64 snapshot packages way out of sync with
latest libc bump... What the hell!
If you guys don't get your sh*t together, I'm done.
Yeah, you read that right.
If this whole situation is not cleared
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 01:50:09PM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote:
nope. I regularly see hardware which is supposed to be good, and which
gives no problems under Linux, which causes a lot of problems under
OpenBSD. I'm just about to throw away a bunch of recent machines that
worked fine with older
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 04:32:21PM -0800, Scott Stanley wrote:
b. have been on this list for a while and totally disregarded the
culture you were within.
grepping my mailbox it looks this is the case. Although he might be just a
troll.
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 10:07:48PM -0500, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
When we build a project using ./configure make make install,
inevitably there are invocations of all sorts of things. Is there a
utility which can log which process was created, its invocation
command, and then record it is
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 06:05:49AM -0700, johhny_at_poland77 wrote:
Does somebody has an idea, that what kind of iptables/pf rule must i use to
achieve this?:
i only want to allow these connections [on the output chain]:
on port 53 output only allow udp - dns
on port 80 output only allow
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 10:06:14AM +0300, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
IMHO it is absolutelly useless, objections are:
1. You can limit connections using firewall.
2. You already have the feature by name limiting the number of
retries
3. If you really want PROTECTION - you should turn off password
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 03:00:18PM +0700, Edho P Arief wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Alexander Schrijver
alexander.schrij...@gmail.com wrote:
It's a great way to keep someone out of their own system.
Unless you enable root login...
How does that help?
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 07:54:13PM -0400, swilly wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 03:22, Alexander Schrijver
alexander.schrij...@gmail.com wrote:
It's a great way to keep someone out of their own system.
Huh? Wouldn't securely backing up the RSA keys prevent this? If you
are mindful enough
Your right that there are other ways to still login.
I meant you're.
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:44:24AM +0200, David Steiner wrote:
thoughts?
Some people don't like it when you make IRC logs publicly available.
format as master.passwd.
Are there any other methods for doing this, or are there things I am
overlooking with this configuration?
Thanks,
Alexander Schrijver
On Nov 22, 2007 2:10 PM, Gilles Chehade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 05:35:00PM +0100, Alexander Schrijver wrote:
Hi everybody,
I am trying to configure a virtual hosting system on OpenBSD, and I am
currently looking at the authentication and user lookup. I have
33 matches
Mail list logo
