On May 6, 2005, at 8:55 PM, Henry Lenzi wrote:
IMHO, the open source community should avoid this Java fixation and
switch to Mono. Mono is free sotware and a superior technology than
Java, from what I've read. Sure, there's lots of investment already
made in Java (Tomcat, etc). But for the BSDs,
On Feb 13, 2006, at 9:24 PM, Damien Miller wrote:
Because that will fail when there are too many arguments, and will
probably break on filenames with spaces (use xargs -0 for these).
Why not use -exec in find?
find . -type f -name ttt -exec rm {}\;
-- Pinski
On Feb 13, 2006, at 9:53 PM, Jason Crawford wrote:
On 2/13/06, Andrew Pinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 13, 2006, at 9:24 PM, Damien Miller wrote:
Because that will fail when there are too many arguments, and will
probably break on filenames with spaces (use xargs -0 for these).
Why
On Feb 13, 2006, at 10:00 PM, Jason Crawford wrote:
Time to write your own program in C instead if the time to invoke
rm is taking too much time.
No point, xargs does what I need it to do, and is much more efficient
than having find execute rm itself. The fewer times you call execve(2)
the
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, chefren wrote:
[snip]
How do you think that irritating recommendation will ever get away without
debugging?
By getting rid of gcc.
; Sorry could not resist that one ;-)
Actually I bet ntohs16 is violating C aliasing rules.
So getting rid of GCC actually is
On Jun 1, 2006, at 1:44 AM, Rico wrote:
Manager: George, I need a program to output the string Hello
World!
You forgot one:
a lazy person
#!/bin/sh
echo Hello World!
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
there is no official port in OpenBSD itself.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
A GCC developer
On Jul 11, 2006, at 11:32 AM, Matthew R. Dempsky wrote:
I notice GCC 4.1 includes a reimplementation of the stack smashing
protection already included in OpenBSD. Have there been any
comments on
this new functionality from the OpenBSD community? Anyone know of
differences between IBM's old
Bug in OpenBSD 3.9?
[EMAIL
PROTECTED]:/usr/local/lib/qt3/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib$
cd lib; cd ..
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/lib$
Shouldn't the correct answer be
[EMAIL
On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 22:07 -0700, Joe wrote:
I'm trying to find a compiler that supports variable length arrays.
I'm currently taking a computer science class and noticed that gcc's
support for variable lenght arrays is broken [0].
The reason why it is broken is not the reason why you think.
10 matches
Mail list logo
