connection (without pf involved).
I get that performance is not the main focus on OpenBSD, but
this regression is kind of scary to me.
Thanks,
On Thu, 04 Oct 2018 17:33:37 -0700
Benjamin Petit wrote:
> I am very brave ind
Thanks, I just saw the previous discussion, from late 2017.
Do you know where we can follow the work that is being done? I would be more
than
happy to test early version.
e Popovski wrote:
> On 4.10.2018. 5:58, Benjamin Petit wrote:
> > Ok so I compared 6.3-release, 6.3-release+syspatches(=stable?) and
> > the latest snapshot from October 2.
> >
> > I measured iperf3 throughput between A and B, like this:
> > PC A <---> APU2
I am trying to setup a PC Engines APU2C2 as a router using OpenBSD. Using the
latest snapshots of CURRENT, with pf disabled, it seems capable to route at
near gigabit speeds, but when enabling pf (with the default config file), I
cannot get a bandwidth of more than 450/440Mbits/s between the
Hello, and thanks for your responses!
> My testing on OpenBSD 6.3 showed speeds of 750/s - 800Mb/s
> with default rules using x86-64 GENERIC (not i386)
Same setup as yours, and I definitely don't reach 750-800Mbits/s (550 at best)
When I transfer a big file from one network to another, I
>
> Thanks
>
> Tom Smyth
> On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 at 04:58, Benjamin Petit wrote:
> > Ok so I compared 6.3-release, 6.3-release+syspatches(=stable?) and
> > the latest snapshot from October 2.
> >
> > I measured iperf3 throughput between A and B, like this:
Ok so I compared 6.3-release, 6.3-release+syspatches(=stable?) and the latest
snapshot from October 2.
I measured iperf3 throughput between A and B, like this:
PC A <---> APU2 <---> PC B
pf rules are the one shipped by default in 6.3:
gw# pfctl -sr
put?
>
> check if smt is disabled ... (Hyper Threading )
>
> Im not sure if this would have an effect on the
> APU2C2 ... but worth checking as it is a change
> in behaviour between 6.3 and current AFIK
>
> Thanks
>
> Tom Smyth
> On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 at 04:58, Benjami
8 matches
Mail list logo
