Theo de Raadt wrote:
We would love it if someone is able to supply one or our developers in
the Netherlands with a dual-cpu Mac. It does not matter if it is G4
or G5, either will do. If anyone can, please drop me a note. Thanks.
So SMP is next on the list of Mark Kettenis after G5 support?
2007/9/18, Can E. Acar [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Theodore Tso wrote:
Number 2, if you take a look at their latest set of changes (which
have still not been accepted), the HAL code is under a pure BSD
license (ath5k_hw.c). Other portions are dual licensed, but not the
HAL --- if people would
Niall O'Higgins wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 02:01:23PM +0100, Hyb wrote:
It seems that the topic of 802.3ad support (link
aggregation|bonding|trunking|whatever you want to call it) seems to come
every so often, but is often disregarded on the basis that gigE is now
cheap. I see the
Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
2002:
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=5858
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/can-you-trust.html
etc
I don't get what this (TCPA now known as TCG) has to do with new Intel
products. This is completely unrelated. A TPM (trusted platform module)
is not going to
T. Ribbrock wrote:
According to this German site (haven't found an English source yet)
http://www.golem.de/0505/38320.html
Intel has denied that the 945 had DRM built-in. They say that it only
has the option to connect Trusted Platform Modules to it, which -
according to Intel - is not news,
Hey,
Just saw this: http://www.niscc.gov.uk/niscc/docs/re-20051114-01014.pdf
Has the isakmpd(8) been tested by the PROTOS test? This test suite (Java
program) is available publicly at
http://www.ee.oulu.fi/research/ouspg/protos/testing/c09/isakmp/
Cheers,
Dries
Chad Loder wrote:
I just tested our isakmpd(8) implementation against the PROTOS
test suite. No problems were detected. We performed an audit
of isakmpd's IKE parsing code back in early 2004 and made several
fixes (OpenBSD 3.4 timeframe).
I guess you are referring to errata 015 of OpenBSD
Axton wrote:
First post here, not sure if this is the right forum. Let me know if not.
From the article:
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security is extending the scope of
its protection to open-source software.
...
The list of open-source projects that Stanford and Coverity plan to
check
fox wrote:
Second, it is not completely accurate to say that OpenBSD is more
secure. If you compare vulnerability counts just from the last 3 months,
OpenBSD had 79 for November, December and January compared to 11 for
Microsoft (and that includes one each for Office and Exchange - so
really 9
Rob W wrote:
What about http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/16375
Fixed in -current, 3.8-stable and 3.7-stable
See http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/net/pf_norm.c
Cheers,
Dries
Rob W wrote:
What about http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/16375 and
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200601251013.k0PAD9lO059018 (Fixed
in cvs, but NO patch for 3.8 or 3.7 and NO security announce -
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/net/if_bridge.c.diff?r1=1.147r2=1.148)
Subcommander l0r3zz wrote:
This came across security focus and I haven't seen it mentioned here.
THey claim 3.8 is vulnerable, anybody know anything?
This has been fixed in -current, 3.8-stable and 3.7-stable.
This crash only works if you have 'scrub fragment crop' or 'scrub
fragment
edgarz wrote:
I want to ask about NIC's with built in 3DES support, in my situation
Intel Pro 100 (Intel 82557). Is that 3DES support usable with OpenBSD +
isakmpd?
No. See http://www.openbsd.org/crypto.html#hardware
Idem for 3com NIC.
Cheers,
Dries
Andris Delfino wrote:
Yes, and he was wrong. He shouldn't base his work in copylefted
software (if he intend to release the result as non-copylefted).
Licenses are licenses.
Yes, Marcus made a mistake. But not the mistake this GPL zealots seem to
think (not knowing that copying GPL code is
On Feb 6, 2008 8:31 PM, Nikns Siankin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The full paper is available at the following URL:
http://www.trusteer.com/docs/dnsopenbsd.html
I find the the fixes done in other BSDs rather ugly because they have
to keep a lot of state information:
*
On Feb 11, 2008 1:34 PM, Manuel Ravasio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I'm still missing is the relationship (if any) between a couple of
hashes and a possible breach in OBSD...
Supposedly these are the hashes of tarball containing exploit
code/binary for a security hole in OpenSSH shipped
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Andri Braselmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AND the most signifant part of this country is: The highways used to be
illuminated at night with a terrible orange light.
We did that such that people in space can locate Belgium. The Chinese
have their wall for
holger glaess wrote:
i try to install this quad pci-x ethernet card that looks like an intel from hp.
in my starting dmesg i got
ppb3 at pci3 dev1 function 0 unknown vendor 0x12d8 product 0x01a7 rev 0x01
pci 4 at ppb3 bus 4
vendor Intel, unknown product 0x10b5 (class network subclass
akonsu wrote:
hello,
i am looking for help getting the intel pro wireless 3945ABG adapter work
with release 3.9. i know that there is a driver for it but i do not think it
is present in this release. i think i need to build everything from source
(which i am trying to avoid). is this correct? i
Dries Schellekens wrote:
The wpi(4) driver was added post 3.9.
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=wpisektion=4
Try a snapshot.
Kerneltrap has a nice article about this new driver:
http://kerneltrap.org/node/6650
Cheers,
Dries
Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
We've put up some Xen-related projects for the Google Summer of
Code, and one of them of particular interest is a port of OpenBSD
to Xen 3.0 as a native guest OS.
Full list: http://www.xensource.com/summerofcode.html
Interested hackers are encouraged to apply; it is a
instance (or even
multiple of them) will run in parallel to the OpenBSD domain.
Cheers,
Dries
On 5/30/06, Dries Schellekens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
We've put up some Xen-related projects for the Google Summer of
Code, and one of them of particular interest is a port
/minimal, and not a complete
Linux/NetBSD/... like it is the case now, to keep the size of the TCB
smaller.
Cheers,
Dries
On 5/30/06, Dries Schellekens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Blair wrote:
That project (if/once completed) would be very useful. I just cringe
at the thought of running
Will H. Backman wrote:
While wandering through the usr.bin source tree (not to imply that I am
qualified to take the journey), I noticed that getopt.c doesn't have a
license clause in it.
Anyone know who david might be?
david@ = David Krause
Cheers,
Dries
riwanlky wrote:
I will like to know if OpenBSD have the capability to update my dynamic
ip to www.dyndns.org.
I am currently running myDYNIPPRO on Windows to update my dynamic ip. I
want to move to OpenBSD. I had currently running sendmail, popa3d, mrtg, mySQL
on the machine.
There is
Jonathan Gray wrote:
The third is based on a TI ACX chip which can be picked by
its blue PCB.
http://kbserver.netgear.com/products/WG311v3.asp
Is this likely to be supported by OpenBSD? Is TI still refusing to
permit the distribution of the firmware blob?
Linux people seem to have figured
Miod Vallat wrote:
I would like to extend the hardware coverage of this port by
supporting more models and more on-board devices. But as long as I do
not have AViiON hardware and rely on other people for testing,
development will not progress very fast, and will hit on our nerves.
So if you
Bihlmaier Andreas wrote:
## openssl speed aes-128-cbc
type 16 bytes 64 bytes256 bytes 1024 bytes 8192 bytes
aes-128 cbc 17311.15k18319.00k18569.35k18893.09k 18765.02k
## openssl speed aes-256-cbc
type 16 bytes 64 bytes256 bytes
Bihlmaier Andreas wrote:
I dont mean to offend you, but ...
Doh, I know that and these are VERY nice figures, BUT my problem is
that I have to slow (== no acceleration) speed in IPSEC.
I thought that OPenBSD would just make use of it (again in IPSEC) if it
detects it.
IPSEC always uses the
Bihlmaier Andreas wrote:
I use iperf -w 256k for testing purposes.
The speed between hosts/router using their real IPs (-B 10.0.0.*) is
about 70-80 Mb/s.
~22 Mb/s between host1 and host2 using their VPN IPs.
Hope this made some stuff more clear.
Thanks everyone for helping, I hope this can
Joco Salvatti wrote:
Let's suppose an attacker entered the room where an OpenBSD server is
located in, and by mistake the system administrator has forgotten to
logout the root login session. So the attacker could enter in single
user mode, without the need for the root password, and load a
Douglas Santos wrote:
You are a joke Pedro Martelletto.
You are the person adding a stupid extra flag to ifconfig, while Pedro
is working on very useful stuff like VFS and file system support.
Cheers,
Dries
Bihlmaier Andreas wrote:
My problem with the speed is that compared to the performance I get out
of openssl (by USERcrypto) the IPSEC (in kernel) performance is terrible.
AFAIK right now it doesn't even make use of the crypto hardware because
I can get the same throughput with a comparable
Dries Schellekens wrote:
As I say earlier, the hardware is working, but the performance
bottleneck is elsewhere (presumably kernel crypto framework).
Sam Leffler of FreeBSD did some work in improving the performance of the
OpenBSD kernel crypto framework:
http://www.usenix.org/event
Bihlmaier Andreas wrote:
As I say earlier, the hardware is working, but the performance
bottleneck is elsewhere (presumably kernel crypto framework).
I'm sorry, I didn't get it the first time, but I get it know :)
This is what I was seeking for, an answer.
Now I have to greatly improve my C
Chris Cappuccio wrote:
Plenty of algorithms that are used in OpenBSD and other free systems
are patented. Who cares?
Which? IDEA crosses my mind, but that is it. AES, DES, RSA, Blowfish,
SHA-1/2 are all not patented.
Cheers,
Dries
to reproduce
the problem. Thanks for paying attention and reporting this.
demime removed the file
Cheers,
Dries
--
Dries Schellekens
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sonjaya wrote:
i have script for update automaticly here:
# cat /root/update_part1.sh
#!/bin/csh
cd /usr/src
setenv CVS_CLIENT_PORT -1
setenv CVSROOT [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs
cvs -d $CVSROOT -q up -rOPENBSD_3_9 -Pd
date /root/update_part1.log
when i try run that script get error such like this :
Alexey Suslikov wrote:
Looks like FreeBSD is helping massively to make our world more BLOBby...
http://bsdblogs.droso.org/netchild/2006/10/19/native-realplayer-for-freebsd/
I don't see what this has to do by blobs in drivers?
There is nothing wrong the closed source software. You can even
Nicolas Martzel wrote:
http://scary.beasts.org/security/CESA-2006-003.html
Feedback about that ?
Corrected or always active ?
http://www.openbsd.org/errata.html#systrace
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 4:22 PM, Duncan Patton a Campbell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems to me the problem is with SYN cookies.
When I read the pseudo article, I had the impression that the server
does not have to implement SYN cookies. Their sockstress program uses
(client) SYN cookies to
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 4:47 PM, Dries Schellekens
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I read the pseudo article, I had the impression that the server
does not have to implement SYN cookies. Their sockstress program uses
(client) SYN cookies to estabilish a lot of TCP connections with
minimal own
42 matches
Mail list logo
