panic: pool_do_get(mcl2k) on Aug 20th snapshot

hello, I have a Soekris 5501 as my home firewall, vr0 is connected to my ISP, vr1 is my internal lan and vr2 is connected to a wireless AP. When copying data (example copying three directories of mp3s each directory 100MB) from a laptop connected to the AP to a server in the lan, I will get a

Re: viomb0 at virtio0panic: Non dma-reachable buffer at curaddr 0x11f7c0a14(raw)

On 2/22/13 8:21 PM, Johan Huldtgren wrote: hello, upgraded to the latest amd64 snapshot today (dated Feb 21st) and server panics on boot. This is a KVM guest at a hosted facility, as I can't boot I am unable to get a dmesg, but here is the text from the panic (with the last few lines) vga1

Re: viomb0 at virtio0panic: Non dma-reachable buffer at curaddr 0x11f7c0a14(raw)

On 2/23/13 6:51 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2013-02-23, Johan Huldtgren johan+openbsd-m...@huldtgren.com wrote: On 2/22/13 8:21 PM, Johan Huldtgren wrote: hello, upgraded to the latest amd64 snapshot today (dated Feb 21st) and server panics on boot. This is a KVM guest at a hosted facility

panic: pool_do_get(mcl2k): free list modified

hello, woke up this morning to the following panic, upon reboot the machine almost immediately (~5 mins) panicked again, but with a slightly different message. My server is a hosted VPS, so my only console is over VNC which means there is no copy / paste functionality. After talking to sthen@

panic: pool_do_get(mcl2k): free list modified on May 20th snapshot

hello, got this panic on the latest amd64 snapshot (May 20th). It looks suspiciously like the one I reported about a month ago http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=136745094101686, as last time I've included just a minimal 'ps' output, and the rest can be seen as screenshots at the below URL:

panic: kernel diagnostic assertion on June 27th amd64 snap

hello, while updating my server today it panics on boot. I can work around the issue and get it up by doing bsd -c and then a 'disable viomb' Details follows and dmsg is attached. panic: kernel diagnostic assertion level = IPL_TTY || level = IPL_CLOCK || flags IPL_MPSAFE failed: file

Re: panic: pool_do_get(mcl2k): free list modified

Following up on my previous report, I've had this panic again, this time on the June 27th snap. Customary information and dmesg below. thanks, .jh ddb show panic pool_do_get(mcl2k): free list modified: page 0xfe80cbcc8000; item addr 0xfe80cbcc8000; offset 0x0=0x100e ddb trace

no audio with aucat

hello, I installed a new system today from the latest snap (September 14th). After installing it, I tried to get some audio and video going, however I've been (mostly) unsuccessful. My first attempts were to watch some videos, when I got neither audio or video I figured I'd step back and try

Re: no audio with aucat

On 9/20/13 6:05 PM, Alexey E. Suslikov wrote: Johan Huldtgren johan+openbsd-misc at huldtgren.com writes: [johan at omgla ~]$ aucat -i 06-Inward_Burst.wav aucat_open: host= unit=0 devnum=0 opt=default /tmp/aucat-1000/aucat0: No such file or directory /tmp/aucat/aucat0: connected have you

Re: no audio with aucat

This is a virtual machine, isn't it? AFAICS, virtual machines can't do full duplex, while eap(4) cards claim they are full-duplex. Correct, it's a virtual machine. Could you add -mplay to the sndiod_flags variable in /etc/rc.conf.local (or whatever you use) and see how this works? that

Re: icalendar support on openbsd 5.5 - mod_dav removed

Quoting Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org: On 2014-05-12, Steve Fairhead st...@fivetrees.com wrote: Hi folks, I'm aware that mod_dav has been removed from 5.5. I was supporting a group of icalendar files under 5.3 with mod_dav. Do I have options for doing the same (read/write access)

Re: 'newer' Qlogic HBA support on amd64

Quoting Pete Vickers peter.vick...@gmail.com: # dmesg | egrep -i qle|scsibus1 qle0 at pci8 dev 0 function 0 QLogic ISP2432 rev 0x02: msi qle0: bad startup mboxes: 0 0 qle0: firmware rev 4.0.20, attrs 0x2 scsibus1 at qle0: 2048 targets, WWPN 50060b66644e, WWNN 50060b66644f sd1 at

Re: owncloud and php5-libsmbclient / occ

Also, if one would like to use occ utility from CLI, considering that the whole owncloud runs chrooted under /var/www/ and that occ therefore looks for /owncloud/apps folder (which is obviously /var/www/owncloud/apps) and that www user is a nologin one, trying to run the following command: #

Re: bringing degraded softraid online

Not sure. Perhaps these drives don't have good meta data due to the crash? Can you set sr_debug = SR_D_STATE | SR_D_META and see if that prints anything informative? well we now get lots more: softraid0 at root scsibus5 at softraid0: 256 targets softraid0: sr_boot_assembly softraid0:

degraded softraid not coming back online

hello, earlier this week a host I have at an offsite location went dark (I have no remote console), today I drove out to take a look. It had panicked, I have pictures of the panic, trace and ps here: http://www.huldtgren.com/panics/ When I tried to bring it back online the softraid volume

Re: bringing degraded softraid online

I would compile a kernel with 'option SR_DEBUG', and with 'uint32_t sr_debug = SR_D_STATE' in sys/dev/softraid.c line 63. This might shed light on which chunks have a problem. at boot I now see this: softraid0 at root scsibus5 at softraid0: 256 targets softraid0: trying to bring up sd9

Re: bringing degraded softraid online

This should show chunk states. To map from number this prints to a state, see the #defines listed at struct bioc_disk.bd_status in sys/dev/biovar.h starting line 92. scsibus5 at softraid0: 256 targets softraid0: trying to bring up sd9 degraded softraid0: sd9 was not shutdown properly

Re: bringing degraded softraid online

Looking at the raid5 code, it looks like you get into this state if more than 2 chunks in the RAID5 volume fail. Are you sure all the disks are OK? As far as I can tell yes, I don't see anything in dmesg, S.M.A.R.T isn't reporting any errors (but I've been told that means little). Anything in

Re: bringing degraded softraid online

I think transcribing these images yourself improves likelyhood of them being read... ok, here goes: panic: Non dma-reachable buffer at curaddr 0x81115888(raw) Stopped at Debugger+0x9: leave TID PID UID PRFLAGS PFLAGS CPU COMMAND *25637 25637 0 0x14000 0x200 1 srdis Debugger() at

bringing degraded softraid online

(apologies if this comes through more than once, I tried unsuccessfully to send this yesterday) hello, earlier this week a host I have at an offsite location went dark (I have no remote console), today I drove out to take a look. It had panicked, I have pictures of the panic, trace and ps here:

Re: bringing degraded softraid online

On 2/16/16 10:31, Joel Sing wrote: This is the reason that the volume will not reassemble - two of your chunks have metadata with version 64, while the rest have version 63. As such, only chunks 0 and 1 are considered to be online - all others have old metadata and are marked offline. This most

Re: OT? - ownCloud vs NextCloud

hello, > Is there some reason there's no Nextcloud port other than no-one has > done one? (yes, this is a reason, but I'm wondering license, politics, > etc). I've been using owncloud for a few years, but recently switched to nextcloud when an upgrade broke my calendar; this might have been

Re: APCu/Memcached/Redis - OwnCloud/Nextcloud memory caching - which OpenBSD package?

hello, > I'm trying to improve the performance of my freshly installed Nextcloud > site. I'm running on my local 1G network and the performance is less > than optimal. > > I've done all the SQL tuning, but from looking at the SQL log files, the > SQL isn't the slow part. make sure your SQL

Re: macbook EFI bootloader

hello, > Recently tried to get my intel macbook (circa '08) dual-booting with > -current amd64 (December 26 snapshot). > > Within OSX I repartitioned the RootDisk and added a MS-DOS (FAT) > partition for the OpenBSD install/disklabel. I booted from CD and > installed to wd0 (using the OpenBSD

Re: Getting Dell RAID status via SNMP

On 2017-07-18 19:45, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2017-07-18, Jibby Jeremiah wrote: ​Stuart H wrote : So for now you would need to run bioctl to fetch status for this. Thanks again Stuart. But I look at the man page and it is not clear to me how to use this:

Re: NextCloud: failed integrity checks

On 2018/07/22 15:39, Nicolas Schmidt wrote: > After installation on OpenBSD 6.3 with pkg_add, NextCloud complains about > files failing the integrity checks. More specifically: > > - occ > * expected hash: >

Re: starting i3 with xenodm

On 2019/03/27 04:59, Normen Wohner wrote: > I installed i3 with pkg_add, > yet don't understand how > to call it from xenodm. > > I tried replacing the stock > ${exec_path}/bin/fvwm > with /usr/local/bin/i3 > inside xenodm's Xsession, > but that didn't help much. > > I then wrote the typical >

Re: Good options for SAS HBA or SATA expansion cards?

> I have a Dell server that was advertised to support 4x3.5 + 2x2.5 > drives but when I popped it open I found there are only 4 SATA ports on > the motherboard total. So of the 6 claimed drives, I can actually > only install 3 drives because the stock DVD drive consumes a mobo port. > > Speaking

Re: Large Filesystem

hello, On 2020-11-14 13:50, Mischa wrote: > Hi All, > > I am currently in the process of building a large filesystem with > 12 x 6TB 3.5" SAS in raid6, effectively ~55TB of storage, to serve as a > central, mostly download, platform with around 100 concurrent > connections. > > The current

Re: init: single user shell terminated, restarting

hello, On 2023-01-16 10:23, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2023-01-15, Barry Grumbine wrote: > > In case someone else runs in to this, and bothers to check misc@ > > > > In this commit: > > https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs=167283731726983=2 > > > > --execute-only (aka NX bit, aka XD bit, aka Data

Re: init: single user shell terminated, restarting

RIC) #545: Fri Jan 20 15:15:44 MST 2023 dera...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC thanks, .jh > > Johan Huldtgren wrote: > > > hello, > > > > On 2023-01-16 10:23, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > On 2023-01-15, Barry Grumb

Re: PC Engines APU platform EOL

On 2023-05-04 5:18, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > You'll open up many more options if you allow a quiet fan for rackmount, > or allow using a non-rackmount box on a rack shelf. I'm in the same boat where I need to replace my current apu4s with a new rackmounted solution. The research I've done so