Re: NAT for dual-WAN with public and private LAN

2018-02-17 15:08 GMT+01:00 miraculli . : > I just got an second ADSL-uplink installed and now I try to reconfigure my > pf.conf to load-balance NAT over both connections. Just a reminder: NAT is not security and IPv6 should be the default. https://youtu.be/v26BAlfWBm8 Best

Re: NAT for dual-WAN with public and private LAN

One addional question regarding this topic: Basically I tried to follow /faq/pf/pools.html. In the example, there is a addional rule to keep https-traffic on one single connection, which I understand as skipping load-balancing for https completely. The load-balancing itself is done with the

Re: NAT for dual-WAN with public and private LAN

On 17 February 2018 at 23:07, Richard Procter wrote: > > > On 18/02/2018, at 8:39 AM, Richard Procter wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I've never attempted such a setup so the following are general pointers > > which may be mistaken. > > > > On 18/02/2018, at 3:08 AM,

NAT for dual-WAN with public and private LAN

Hi misc, I just got an second ADSL-uplink installed and now I try to reconfigure my pf.conf to load-balance NAT over both connections. Just to be more concrete: It is a Hotel-Setup with a guest accessible public Wifi-LAN (Ubuiqity UniFi Devices) and a private LAN for Office-Devices. I use a