Re: C++14 and C11 support sucks in OpenBSDs default compiler - any chance of Clang in base?

2015-03-27 Thread Tim van der Molen 
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (2015-03-27 09:29 +0100):
 Some Developer said:
  So what are the reasons why OpenBSD has so far shunned Clang and LLDB? Is it
  missing some extra security features that the OpenBSD team have added to
  their version of GCC?
 
 First and foremost it is missing platform support.

Also, as miod@ once explained, before a switch to clang could be made,
intimate knowledge of its internals is needed. Over the years, the
OpenBSD developers have become very familiar with gcc. They are now
working on becoming just as familiar with clang.

Search the archives; this has been discussed before.

Re: C++14 and C11 support sucks in OpenBSDs default compiler - any chance of Clang in base?

2015-03-27 Thread Mike Burns 
On 2015-03-27 08.03.25 +, Some Developer wrote:
 So what are the reasons why OpenBSD has so far shunned Clang and LLDB?

http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=137530560232232

Re: C++14 and C11 support sucks in OpenBSDs default compiler - any chance of Clang in base?

2015-03-27 Thread Dmitrij D. Czarkoff 
Some Developer said:
 So what are the reasons why OpenBSD has so far shunned Clang and LLDB? Is it
 missing some extra security features that the OpenBSD team have added to
 their version of GCC?

First and foremost it is missing platform support.

-- 
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff