Re: Latency and loss persist with iwm0 (Was Re: Latency with run0 interface)

2022-03-16 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 03:58:59PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: > APs not showing up in the 5GHz band has always been a problem on > Intel cards. It goes back to older drivers like iwn(4) or perhaps > even ipw(4). Oops, I meant wpi(4), not ipw(4) :) (ipw is 11b only)

Re: Latency and loss persist with iwm0 (Was Re: Latency with run0 interface)

2022-03-16 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 07:56:20AM -0500, rea...@catastrophe.net wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 10:11:50AM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: > >Looks like a firwmare or driver issue to me. > > > >Sorry, without having a reproducible test case in front of me, there > >is nothing I could do fix this

Re: Latency and loss persist with iwm0 (Was Re: Latency with run0 interface)

2022-03-16 Thread readme
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 10:11:50AM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: >Looks like a firwmare or driver issue to me. > >Sorry, without having a reproducible test case in front of me, there >is nothing I could do fix this from afar. I mean, in fact it's 100% reproducible. >You could try moving the AP

Re: Latency and loss persist with iwm0 (Was Re: Latency with run0 interface)

2022-03-16 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 02:50:29PM -0500, rea...@catastrophe.net wrote: > Ok, please see the following. The card is cleared of its monitor config then > put onto channel 132 in debug mode. > > # ifconfig iwm0 -chan > # ifconfig iwm0 -mediaopt monitor > # ifconfig iwm0 > iwm0: flags=8806 mtu 1500

Re: Latency and loss persist with iwm0 (Was Re: Latency with run0 interface)

2022-03-15 Thread readme
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 05:19:34PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: >On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 09:09:57AM -0500, rea...@catastrophe.net wrote: [..] >> # ifconfig iwm0 mediaopt monitor mode 11n >> # ifconfig iwm0 chan 132 >> # ifconfig iwm0 up [..] > >> Next I'll try join the network using the 5Ghz

Re: Latency and loss persist with iwm0 (Was Re: Latency with run0 interface)

2022-03-15 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 09:09:57AM -0500, rea...@catastrophe.net wrote: > Yes you did, and I greatly appreciate it. However, the interface won't > join to anything once out of monitor mode. > > # uname -a > OpenBSD server.example.org 7.0 GENERIC.MP#5 amd64 > > # ifconfig iwm0 mediaopt monitor

Re: Latency and loss persist with iwm0 (Was Re: Latency with run0 interface)

2022-03-15 Thread readme
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 02:15:41PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: >On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 08:02:07AM -0500, rea...@catastrophe.net wrote: >> Unfortunately it appears as though I've run into it. Is there any recourse >> to provide more useful debugging information to find the issue? > >I already

Re: Latency and loss persist with iwm0 (Was Re: Latency with run0 interface)

2022-03-15 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 08:02:07AM -0500, rea...@catastrophe.net wrote: > On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 11:37:15PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: > >In the implementation, the mode determines which channels are available, > >not the other way around. > >And for some reason your interface goes into a mode

Re: Latency and loss persist with iwm0 (Was Re: Latency with run0 interface)

2022-03-15 Thread readme
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 11:37:15PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: >On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 05:16:32PM -0500, rea...@catastrophe.net wrote: >> Trying to manually monitor channel 132, I get an error, SIOCS80211CHANNEL. >> [..] >> # ifconfig iwm0 chan 132 >> ifconfig: SIOCS80211CHANNEL: Invalid

Re: Latency and loss persist with iwm0 (Was Re: Latency with run0 interface)

2022-03-14 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 05:16:32PM -0500, rea...@catastrophe.net wrote: > Trying to manually monitor channel 132, I get an error, SIOCS80211CHANNEL. > > # ifconfig iwm0 > iwm0: flags=8802 mtu 1500 > lladdr 80:19:34:ab:ab:ab > index 5 priority 4 llprio 3 > groups: wlan >

Re: Latency and loss persist with iwm0 (Was Re: Latency with run0 interface)

2022-03-14 Thread readme
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 10:34:04PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: >On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 04:07:33PM -0500, rea...@catastrophe.net wrote: >> Just sitting around doing nothing I'm seeing 30% loss to my next hop. >> >> # ifconfig iwm0 >> iwm0: flags=808843 mtu 1500 >> lladdr 80:19:34:ab:ab:ab

Re: Latency and loss persist with iwm0 (Was Re: Latency with run0 interface)

2022-03-14 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 04:07:33PM -0500, rea...@catastrophe.net wrote: > Just sitting around doing nothing I'm seeing 30% loss to my next hop. > > # ifconfig iwm0 > iwm0: flags=808843 mtu 1500 > lladdr 80:19:34:ab:ab:ab > index 5 priority 4 llprio 3 > groups: wlan egress >

Re: Latency and loss persist with iwm0 (Was Re: Latency with run0 interface)

2022-03-14 Thread readme
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 09:42:37PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: >On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 03:05:00PM -0500, rea...@catastrophe.net wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 08:58:01PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: >> >On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 02:34:29PM -0500, rea...@catastrophe.net wrote: >> >> Well, even

Re: Latency and loss persist with iwm0 (Was Re: Latency with run0 interface)

2022-03-14 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 03:05:00PM -0500, rea...@catastrophe.net wrote: > On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 08:58:01PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: > >On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 02:34:29PM -0500, rea...@catastrophe.net wrote: > >> Well, even after adding iwm0 I notice high latency and packet loss anywhere >

Re: Latency and loss persist with iwm0 (Was Re: Latency with run0 interface)

2022-03-14 Thread readme
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 08:58:01PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: >On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 02:34:29PM -0500, rea...@catastrophe.net wrote: >> Well, even after adding iwm0 I notice high latency and packet loss anywhere >> from 15-50%. This occurs randomly when the device is either 2m, 10m, or 30m

Re: Latency and loss persist with iwm0 (Was Re: Latency with run0 interface)

2022-03-14 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 02:34:29PM -0500, rea...@catastrophe.net wrote: > Well, even after adding iwm0 I notice high latency and packet loss anywhere > from 15-50%. This occurs randomly when the device is either 2m, 10m, or 30m > away from the access point. I did testing to verify I'm seeing