@openbsd.org; gianca...@engageinc.com
Subject: Re: License
I want to use the IPv6 source code in one of the products manufactured by
my
company and need to know if there are any restrictions or limitations
regarding the use of source code in commercial products. Please let me
know
On Wed, 1 Jun 2011 18:02:23 -0700, Simranjit Gill wrote:
I want to use the IPv6 source code in one of the products manufactured by my
company and need to know if there are any restrictions or limitations
regarding the use of source code in commercial products. Please let me know
if this is not
I want to use the IPv6 source code in one of the products manufactured by my
company and need to know if there are any restrictions or limitations
regarding the use of source code in commercial products. Please let me know
if this is not right place to enquire regarding the license. Thank you.
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Simranjit Gill sim...@engageinc.com wrote:
Hello,
I want to use the IPv6 source code in one of the products manufactured by my
company and need to know if there are any restrictions or limitations
regarding the use of source code in commercial products.
I want to use the IPv6 source code in one of the products manufactured by my
company and need to know if there are any restrictions or limitations
regarding the use of source code in commercial products. Please let me know
if this is not right place to enquire regarding the license. Thank you.
Simranjit == Simranjit Gill sim...@engageinc.com writes:
Simranjit Hello, I want to use the IPv6 source code in one of the
Simranjit products manufactured by my company and need to know if there
Simranjit are any restrictions or limitations regarding the use of
Simranjit source code in
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 01:37:53PM -0700, Bob Beck wrote:
* Marco Peereboom [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-03 06:19]:
No harm done just stupidity perpetuated. Kind of like fox news.
Dunno about no harm done there marco - Saying fox news doesn't do
any harm is like saying Joesph Goebels
Pedro de Oliveira wrote:
Hello,
Someone on IRC just posted this link http://www.delilinux.de/oksh/ , seems
like someone ported OpenBSD ksh to Linux and licensed it under GPLv3.
Isn't
this a license violation?
The ksh in OpenBSD is the pdksh (Public Domain). Slap a license on it if
you
No harm done just stupidity perpetuated. Kind of like fox news.
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 12:32:56AM -0500, David H. Lynch Jr. wrote:
Jacob Meuser wrote:
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 04:05:10PM -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote:
There are other sources as well:
Marco Peereboom wrote:
No harm done just stupidity perpetuated. Kind of like fox news.
I like that one! (; Started my day on a good note.
Always thought Fox News was really bad, but felt many disagree.
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
...
Always thought Faux News was really bad,...
There. Fixed it for you. ;)
* Marco Peereboom [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-03 06:19]:
No harm done just stupidity perpetuated. Kind of like fox news.
Dunno about no harm done there marco - Saying fox news doesn't do
any harm is like saying Joesph Goebels didn't to any harm - only
perpetuated stupidity..
Bob Beck wrote:
* Marco Peereboom [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-03 06:19]:
No harm done just stupidity perpetuated. Kind of like fox news.
Dunno about no harm done there marco - Saying fox news doesn't do
any harm is like saying Joesph Goebels didn't to any harm - only
Hello,
Someone on IRC just posted this link http://www.delilinux.de/oksh/ , seems
like someone ported OpenBSD ksh to Linux and licensed it under GPLv3. Isn't
this a license violation?
See /usr/src/bin/ksh/LEGAL.
People can do just about whatever they want with public domain code,
Pedro de Oliveira writes:
Hello,
Someone on IRC just posted this link http://www.delilinux.de/oksh/ , seems
like someone ported OpenBSD ksh to Linux and licensed it under GPLv3. Isn't
this a license violation?
See /usr/src/bin/ksh/LEGAL.
People can do just about whatever they want with
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 07:30:02PM -, Pedro de Oliveira wrote:
Hello,
Someone on IRC just posted this link http://www.delilinux.de/oksh/ , seems
like someone ported OpenBSD ksh to Linux and licensed it under GPLv3. Isn't
this a license violation?
It seems that this is not a violation
Miod Vallat writes:
But some parts of OpenBSD's ksh are BSD-licensed files, which did not
come from pdksh initially.
That's not what /usr/src/bin/ksh/LEGAL states, but I didn't look
further. OK, looking I see that alloc.c and mknod.c have copyrights.
Relicensing these files under GPLv3 is
Pedro de Oliveira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Someone on IRC just posted this link http://www.delilinux.de/oksh/ ,
seems
like someone ported OpenBSD ksh to Linux and licensed it under GPLv3.
Isn't this a license violation?
Marco S Hyman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 06:14:09PM -0300, Andr?s wrote:
On Dec 2, 2007 5:42 PM, Marco S Hyman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Miod Vallat writes:
But some parts of OpenBSD's ksh are BSD-licensed files, which did not
come from pdksh initially.
That's not what /usr/src/bin/ksh/LEGAL states,
Marco S Hyman wrote:
Miod Vallat writes:
But some parts of OpenBSD's ksh are BSD-licensed files, which did not
come from pdksh initially.
That's not what /usr/src/bin/ksh/LEGAL states, but I didn't look
further. OK, looking I see that alloc.c and mknod.c have copyrights.
There are other sources as well:
http://www.peereboom.us/ksh_linux.html
http://www.wormhole.hu/~ice/ksh/
Don't know why that dude went through the trouble of putting gplv3 shit
on it.
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 07:30:02PM -, Pedro de Oliveira wrote:
Hello,
Someone on IRC just posted this link
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 04:05:10PM -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote:
There are other sources as well:
http://www.peereboom.us/ksh_linux.html
http://www.wormhole.hu/~ice/ksh/
Don't know why that dude went through the trouble of putting gplv3 shit
on it.
fear, misunderstanding, and confusion
Jacob Meuser wrote:
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 04:05:10PM -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote:
There are other sources as well:
http://www.peereboom.us/ksh_linux.html
http://www.wormhole.hu/~ice/ksh/
Don't know why that dude went through the trouble of putting gplv3 shit
on it.
fear,
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 12:09:47PM -0400, Will H. Backman wrote:
While wandering through the usr.bin source tree (not to imply that I am
qualified to take the journey), I noticed that getopt.c doesn't have a
license clause in it.
Anyone know who david might be?
$OpenBSD: getopt.c,v 1.6
Will H. Backman wrote:
While wandering through the usr.bin source tree (not to imply that I am
qualified to take the journey), I noticed that getopt.c doesn't have a
license clause in it.
Anyone know who david might be?
david@ = David Krause
Cheers,
Dries
On 5/31/06, Will H. Backman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While wandering through the usr.bin source tree (not to imply that I am
qualified to take the journey), I noticed that getopt.c doesn't have a
license clause in it.
Anyone know who david might be?
$OpenBSD: getopt.c,v 1.6 2003/07/10
Ted Unangst wrote:
On 5/31/06, Will H. Backman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While wandering through the usr.bin source tree (not to imply that I am
qualified to take the journey), I noticed that getopt.c doesn't have a
license clause in it.
Anyone know who david might be?
$OpenBSD: getopt.c,v
On 5/31/06, Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/31/06, Will H. Backman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While wandering through the usr.bin source tree (not to imply that I am
qualified to take the journey), I noticed that getopt.c doesn't have a
license clause in it.
Anyone know who david
28 matches
Mail list logo
