Re: Using an ASUS K8S-MX a mistake? - update

2005-08-14 Thread Joe Szedula
I've installed the amd64 -current (13 August) on my ASUS K8S-MX system. It solved the bus-master DMA error problem as well as the problem with the drives (CD hard disk) on the secondary IDE not being recognized. I compiled the kernel and the rest of the system from source just to exercise the

Re: Using an ASUS K8S-MX a mistake? - update

2005-08-14 Thread Jonathan Gray
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 09:04:04AM -0500, Joe Szedula wrote: I've installed the amd64 -current (13 August) on my ASUS K8S-MX system. It solved the bus-master DMA error problem as well as the problem with the drives (CD hard disk) on the secondary IDE not being recognized. I compiled the

Re: Using an ASUS K8S-MX a mistake? - update

2005-08-14 Thread Ray Percival
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 09:04:04AM -0500, Joe Szedula wrote: I've installed the amd64 -current (13 August) on my ASUS K8S-MX system. snip The dmesg shows these unknown items: ppb1 at pci0 dev 6 function 0 vendor SIS, unknown product 0x000a rev 0x00 ppb2 at pci0 dev 7 function 0 vendor

Re: Using an ASUS K8S-MX a mistake? - update

2005-08-14 Thread Joe Szedula
On 8/14/05 10:29 AM, Jonathan Gray ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Does this: SIS 182 SATA rev 0x01 at pci0 dev 5 function 0 not configured just mean there were no SATA drives connected? Will SATA drives work when connected to this motherboard? No this means no driver has claimed that device.

Re: Using an ASUS K8S-MX a mistake? - update

2005-08-14 Thread Jonathan Gray
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 12:14:02PM -0500, Joe Szedula wrote: On 8/14/05 10:29 AM, Jonathan Gray ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Does this: SIS 182 SATA rev 0x01 at pci0 dev 5 function 0 not configured just mean there were no SATA drives connected? Will SATA drives work when connected to