Re: not exactly (Re: systrace removed? Why?)

2016-09-03 Thread Michal Bozon
if someone's interested, here a list of fs differences between 6.0 upgraded from 5.9, and 6.0 install, i found, with some obvious differences like smtpd spool or sysmerge backups removed (amd64/qemu): http://pastebin.com/raw/VPkdbvxy (text/plain) (not pasting because of long lines) hth

Re: not exactly (Re: systrace removed? Why?)

2016-09-03 Thread Edgar Pettijohn
Sent from my iPhone On Sep 3, 2016, at 12:46 PM, Michal Bozon wrote: >> good(?) news: sysmerge is gone in 6.0 >> but not removed by 5.9 to 6.0 uprade process. > > s/sysmerge/systrace/ > pledge()

Re: not exactly (Re: systrace removed? Why?)

2016-09-03 Thread Michal Bozon
> > good(?) news: sysmerge is gone in 6.0 > > but not removed by 5.9 to 6.0 uprade process. > > > > I really have a hard time understanding what you're trying to point out. > > Yes, systrace is gone, but it's an ordinary binary that does no harm, > feel free to remove it if it makes you feel

Re: not exactly (Re: systrace removed? Why?)

2016-09-03 Thread Michal Bozon
> good(?) news: sysmerge is gone in 6.0 > but not removed by 5.9 to 6.0 uprade process. s/sysmerge/systrace/

Re: not exactly (Re: systrace removed? Why?)

2016-09-03 Thread Theo Buehler
On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 05:37:22PM +, Michal Bozon wrote: > > Why? > > good(?) news: sysmerge is gone in 6.0 > but not removed by 5.9 to 6.0 uprade process. > I really have a hard time understanding what you're trying to point out. Yes, systrace is gone, but it's an ordinary binary that