Re: spamd and IPv6

[Aham Brahmasmi]

> Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2018 at 11:30 AM
> From: "Denis Fondras" 
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Subject: Re: spamd and IPv6
>
> > does anyone can tell me what the state of spamd and IPv6 is? I would
> > have expected it to work but I can't set for exampe ::1 or [::1] as a
> > listening address (neither alone or together with 127.0.0.1).
> > 
> 
> Unsupported yet. phessler@ has a diff for it.
> 
> 
Hi Denis,

Thank you for the information.

Hi phessler@,

I am interested in the spamd and IPv6 functionality, primarily because
an IPv4 address costs a lot and I wish to run an IPv6-only mail server.

If possible, I would request you to please merge the IPv6 functionality
in the base spamd.

I understand that most volks will consider this to be stupid for someone
like me who is still learning his way around an OS. However, OpenBSD has
been relatively straight forward and hence my IPv6-only (mis?)adventure.

Thanks.

Regards,
ab
-|-|-|-|-|-|-|--

Re: spamd and IPv6

[Niels Kobschaetzki]

On 18/02/14 11:30, Denis Fondras wrote:

does anyone can tell me what the state of spamd and IPv6 is? I would
have expected it to work but I can't set for exampe ::1 or [::1] as a
listening address (neither alone or together with 127.0.0.1).



Unsupported yet. phessler@ has a diff for it.


Thanks

Re: spamd and IPv6

[Denis Fondras]

> does anyone can tell me what the state of spamd and IPv6 is? I would
> have expected it to work but I can't set for exampe ::1 or [::1] as a
> listening address (neither alone or together with 127.0.0.1).
> 

Unsupported yet. phessler@ has a diff for it.

spamd and IPv6

[Niels Kobschaetzki]

Hi,

does anyone can tell me what the state of spamd and IPv6 is? I would
have expected it to work but I can't set for exampe ::1 or [::1] as a
listening address (neither alone or together with 127.0.0.1).

Niels

spamd and IPv6

[Heiko Zimmermann]

Hi OpenBSD Team,

are there any news about spamd and IPv6?

OpenSMTPD is working fine with IPv6. So there is a usecase for spamd and
IPv6 too.

This is the last status I found:
http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20131022072601

Could you give me a status update?

Thank you in advance.
 -Heiko

Re: spamd and IPv6?

[Stuart Henderson]

On 2009-05-28, Stefan Unterweger  wrote:
> Does spamd(8) currently support IPv6?

No. There are parts of code that make a start at supporting it, but here
is your main clue:

if (sa->sa_family != AF_INET)
errx(1, "not supported yet");

spamd and IPv6?

[Stefan Unterweger]

Hello!

Does spamd(8) currently support IPv6? Whereas I am able to
spamdb(1) -a IPv6-addresses and they show up on subsequent visits
to spamdb, netstat -a suggests that spamd itself is not listening
on a tcp6 socket. Unfortunately, the manpages don't mention IPv6
at all, and I'm too poor a programmer to deduct it from the
source code.

To be honest, I wouldn't be surprised it spamd does indeed not
support IPv6, there'd be hardly a point for it. I seriously doubt
that *any* current spammer'd be using IPv6, but still: now that
I've got that fancy new tunnel up and running I thought I'd play
around with it a bit.


s//un