On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 3:15 PM wrote:
> Use multiple interfaces, one per site to connect with. Overhead isnt really
> present, its just routing and hashes at that point.
> (I’ve had no issues doing site to sites in this fashion, has been working
> great for months)
I was picturing 3 wgx interf
Use multiple interfaces, one per site to connect with. Overhead isnt really
present, its just routing and hashes at that point.
(I’ve had no issues doing site to sites in this fashion, has been working great
for months)
> On Jul 31, 2020, at 10:43 AM, Sonic wrote:
>
> The need is for site-to
The need is for site-to-site vpns (multiple client sites to one server
site), 3 vlans each.
>From a management point of view it might be better to use 3 wireguard
interfaces on all of the routers (wg0, wg1, wg2). But I'm not sure if
that adds overhead, and if so how much.
Basically, is it better to
3 matches
Mail list logo
