Re: OpenSMTPD build on OpenSSL 1.1.x

2019-08-28 Thread Gilles Chehade
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 10:55:05AM +0300, Reio Remma wrote: > On 28/08/2019 10:44, gil...@poolp.org wrote: > > 28 ao??t 2019 00:00 "Reio Remma" a ??crit: > > > > > On 27.08.2019 21:25, Richard Narron wrote: > > > > > > > The OpenSMTPD portable version from > > > >

Re: OpenSMTPD build on OpenSSL 1.1.x

2019-08-28 Thread Reio Remma
On 28/08/2019 01:00, Reio Remma wrote: The fresh RPM installed nicely on a clean CentOS 7 with their OpenSSH 1.0.2k and OpenSMTPD started too: Aug 28 00:50:07 localhost smtpd[9338]: cfa3e1042696f77a mta delivery evpid=953ab16d13e43b2f from= to= rcpt=<-> source="192.168.1.142"

Re: OpenSMTPD build on OpenSSL 1.1.x

2019-08-28 Thread gilles
Hello, 27 août 2019 20:25 "Richard Narron" a écrit: > The OpenSMTPD portable version from https://github.com/OpenSMTPD/OpenSMTPD > works fine on Slackware64 current with OpenSSL 1.1.1c and gcc 9.2 > Yay ! > It took me a while to get it to work though. > > I first downloaded the "current"

Re: OpenSMTPD build on OpenSSL 1.1.x

2019-08-28 Thread Reio Remma
On 28/08/2019 10:44, gil...@poolp.org wrote: 28 août 2019 00:00 "Reio Remma" a écrit: On 27.08.2019 21:25, Richard Narron wrote: The OpenSMTPD portable version from https://github.com/OpenSMTPD/OpenSMTPD works fine on Slackware64 current with OpenSSL 1.1.1c and gcc 9.2 It took me a while to

Re: OpenSMTPD build on OpenSSL 1.1.x

2019-08-28 Thread gilles
28 août 2019 00:00 "Reio Remma" a écrit: > On 27.08.2019 21:25, Richard Narron wrote: > >> The OpenSMTPD portable version from https://github.com/OpenSMTPD/OpenSMTPD >> works fine on Slackware64 current with OpenSSL 1.1.1c and gcc 9.2 >> It took me a while to get it to work though. >> I first

Re: OpenSMTPD build on OpenSSL 1.1.x

2019-08-28 Thread Reio Remma
On 28/08/2019 11:30, Gilles Chehade wrote: OpenSSL 1.0.x is going to be supported until 2019-12-31 so this will get solved by itself soon ;-) Unfortunately not for CentOS 7. :D They have a policy of not making major version upgrades during the lifecycle of an OS version. :( Suspect I'll

Question about match auth with the new syntax.

2019-08-28 Thread Reio Remma
Hello! I've pretty much converted my setup to the new syntax now and I'm wondering if I get this right. I understand that from local was changed to not include authenticated users, but my question is does "match auth" match both authenticated and local users? I currently have - "match

Re: Question about match auth with the new syntax.

2019-08-28 Thread Edgar Pettijohn
On Aug 28, 2019 1:52 PM, Reio Remma wrote: > > Hello! > > I've pretty much converted my setup to the new syntax now and I'm > wondering if I get this right. > > I understand that from local was changed to not include authenticated > users, but my question is does "match auth" match both