Re: Failure to check FCrDNS with long DNS replies?

2022-10-20 Thread Joerg Jung
> On 18. Oct 2022, at 16:41, Tassilo Philipp > wrote: > >>> On 21. Nov 2020, at 10:44, Tassilo Philipp >>> wrote: >>> FYI, I run into the same issue with a different provider: relay.yourmailgateway.de which also has a large number of A records. Trying to reproduce and

Re: Failure to check FCrDNS with long DNS replies?

2022-10-18 Thread Tassilo Philipp
On 21. Nov 2020, at 10:44, Tassilo Philipp wrote: FYI, I run into the same issue with a different provider: relay.yourmailgateway.de which also has a large number of A records. Trying to reproduce and digging deeper now, by adding debug logs etc. Interesting... thanks for checking and

Re: Failure to check FCrDNS with long DNS replies?

2022-10-18 Thread Joerg Jung
> On 21. Nov 2020, at 10:44, Tassilo Philipp > wrote: > >> FYI, I run into the same issue with a different provider: >> relay.yourmailgateway.de which also has a large number of A records. >> >> Trying to reproduce and digging deeper now, by adding debug logs etc. > > Interesting... thanks

Re: Failure to check FCrDNS with long DNS replies?

2020-11-21 Thread Tassilo Philipp
FYI, I run into the same issue with a different provider: relay.yourmailgateway.de which also has a large number of A records. Trying to reproduce and digging deeper now, by adding debug logs etc. Interesting... thanks for checking and having thought of my report. I for myself didn't have any

Re: Failure to check FCrDNS with long DNS replies?

2020-11-20 Thread Joerg Jung
On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 02:05:20PM +0200, Tassilo Philipp wrote: > > Mhmm… but they returned different results, for dig vs OpenSMTPd filter > > lookup? > > Not sure, as I don't log the replies, but I don't think so. > > > > May cache TTL have expired and record re-fetched with your local test?

Re: Failure to check FCrDNS with long DNS replies?

2020-08-03 Thread Tassilo Philipp
Mhmm… but they returned different results, for dig vs OpenSMTPd filter lookup? Not sure, as I don't log the replies, but I don't think so. May cache TTL have expired and record re-fetched with your local test? What’s your local cache software, is it able to handle large A record lists?

Re: Failure to check FCrDNS with long DNS replies?

2020-08-03 Thread Joerg Jung
> On 3. Aug 2020, at 12:23, Tassilo Philipp wrote: > > Thanks for the reply and your thoughts. > >> There should be nothing limit FCrDNS here, despite that >> these are a lot of records. >> >> But have you tried the dig lookup below from the actual mail >> server at the time (or shortly

Re: Failure to check FCrDNS with long DNS replies?

2020-08-03 Thread Tassilo Philipp
Thanks for the reply and your thoughts. There should be nothing limit FCrDNS here, despite that these are a lot of records. But have you tried the dig lookup below from the actual mail server at the time (or shortly after) the time of the failure? Yes, that was the first thing I tried, and I

Re: Failure to check FCrDNS with long DNS replies?

2020-08-02 Thread Joerg Jung
> On 21. Jul 2020, at 12:46, Tassilo Philipp > wrote: > > Hello, > > I have a strange problem, emails coming from a specific SMTP from SFR, namely > smtp26.services.sfr.fr get incorrectly filtered by a fcrdns check. The filter > line in question is: > > filter check_fcrdns phase connect