> No, the two are independent, except for the project web pages, which
> are managed by CVS on savannah. But I'm not very excited about moving
> at the moment, although Google Code does have some nice features.
Yeah, I understand. I thought I should mention it since this would be
the easiest tim
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Arthur A. Gleckler wrote:
> Let's consider hosting MIT Scheme on another service. Google Code's
> project hosting service, for example, has full-time staff making sure
> that it's up and backed up. It also has a much cleaner UI. And now
> that we've already had
OK, I've pushed the copy up.
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Matt Birkholz
wrote:
>> From: Chris Hanson
>> Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 02:01:53 -0700
>>
>> [...] My local copy is dated May 18 at 3:05am PDT and was
>> synchronized at that time. Does anyone have a more recent copy? If
>> not, I'll pus
> From: Chris Hanson
> Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 02:01:53 -0700
>
> [...] My local copy is dated May 18 at 3:05am PDT and was
> synchronized at that time. Does anyone have a more recent copy? If
> not, I'll push mine up.
Nope. My `git log -1 origin/master` looks something like this:
commit 6
> Savannah crashed a couple of days due to hardware problems. We lost
> the git repository because it wasn't backed up (apparently there was
> some issue with backups in the time leading up to the failure -- what
> do you want for a free service, anyway). The CVS repository is not at
> issue beca
Savannah crashed a couple of days due to hardware problems. We lost
the git repository because it wasn't backed up (apparently there was
some issue with backups in the time leading up to the failure -- what
do you want for a free service, anyway). The CVS repository is not at
issue because I have
