On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 9:31 PM, Taylor R Campbell wrote:
> Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2011 21:19:55 +0100
> From: Alexey Radul
>
> Expected behavior: Ideally, the compiler would successfully compile
> the enclosed file; I believe it to be correct -- in particular, the
> i
Hi all,
Is there any reason why there is no secondary GC daemon that runs
hash-table/clean! on all weak hash tables? Are there any issues I
should be aware of before installing one to clean some select weak
hash tables that are present in my program?
Thanks,
~Alexey
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Taylor R Campbell wrote:
> Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 19:17:09 +0100
> From: Alexey Radul
>
> Is there any reason why there is no secondary GC daemon that runs
> hash-table/clean! on all weak hash tables? Are there any issues I
> should
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 8:10 PM, Taylor R Campbell wrote:
> To recap: Alexey's symptom is that LIAR chokes when it generates a
> straight-line sequence of machine code that exceeds 64 kilobytes. The
> immediate source of the problem is that the format word just before
> any straight-line sequenc
Micah,
Respectfully, in general, users who rely on subtleties of the detailed
semantics of undocumented procedures [*] should expect occasional
incompatible changes. And what communication channel do we have
except postings on the devel mailing list?
As to ecosystem stewardship, do we as a commu
