ry for e.g. tracked ultrasound).
Bye
Michael
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Clarkson, Matt [mailto:m.clark...@ucl.ac.uk]
Gesendet: Freitag, 18. September 2015 15:21
An: Sebastian Ordas
Cc: MITK
Betreff: Re: [mitk-users] Generic Video Interface
Hi,
yeah, I have used PLUS, and they sup
Hi,
yeah, I have used PLUS, and they support a lot of tracker, ultrasound and video
devices, and could stream data via OpenIGTLink into MITK, which is all great!
(Thanks to all the people involved).
But, I’m thinking that if you have stereo, RGB(A), HD video (1920x1080), then
you don’t want to
Matt, have you looked into Plus? they support Ultrasonix and a couple
more US devices
http://perk-software.cs.queensu.ca/plus/doc/nightly/user/Devices.html
The easiest would be to send the video stream (and synchronized tracking
data if you want) from PlusServer via OpenIGTLink to your mitk-base
Hi Alfred,
I think I made Terason up. I was thinking of your portable one … must be a
Telemed? Would anyone be interested in Ultrasonix? I can also take a look to
see if its generalisable, and propose some ideas.
Yes, the OpenCVVideoSupport module is pretty nice, thanks!
M
> On 17 Sep 2015,
Hi Matt,
yes, for US machines control is possible. We implemented this for the
Telemed ultrasound system and it works well. The software structure is
designed expandable, so new devices can be added by derving from general
superclasses and so on. Of course we appreciate any contribution in this
Hi there,
Random question:
I see that there is a general purpose API for US machines
(http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11548-013-0962-z#page-1). From
memory I recall a design where one could provide direct control of an
ultrasound scanner such as a Terrason, or Ultrasonix using the v
