Hi
I have just tested QFile::map() on Windows XP. On Windows the file is
automatically locked against writes from other processes when it is mapped by
one process.
-
I agree with Ilkka that we should pick a solid solution that covers also the
rear use cases when a user uses Mixxx
Hi Owen,
please do me a favour and forget about that doing stuff in background while
people think mixxx is already closed sh*t. The user should know about mixxx
is doing things especialy when writing files. A progress bar indicating what is
going on and how much files are already processed
Yes yes!!
This really should be a user decision.
There are changes to your music database which are not saved to your
music files.
Would you like to:
1. Write all changes to files
2. Revert all changes
3. Skip
4. Never sync
5. Sync quietly from now on
(you can update your choice from
Hi Stan,
If you want to have a preview of the End of Track Warning currently
implemented, use the Mixxx version proposed for testing on this post :
http://www.mixxx.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=1t=3493
Regards,
Maxime
2012/4/2 keithsalisb...@gmail.com keithsalisb...@gmail.com:
Hi Stan,
I'm
Hi!
Is there a downsampling function available somehwere in the mixxx sources
or maybe one of the libraries already being used in mixxx ?
I need it to downsample audio to 4410 Hz for using with the libkeyfinder.
Varun
--
Yes yes!!
This really should be a user decision.
I agree on that.
But personally I think that the sync/revert could be really complex to
implement and comes with many use cases we can't even think of ...
What about explicitly asking user to commit metadata changes to actually
modifying files
2012/4/2 Daniel Schürmann dasch...@gmx.de
Hi
I have just tested QFile::map() on Windows XP. On Windows the file is
automatically locked against writes from other processes when it is mapped
by one process.
So this means that we cannot write to a file from an external process
while Mixxx
Of course we would provide some indicator that we were performing cleanup
tasks like writing metadata at shutdown...
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 4:14 AM, Thomas Baag tho...@b2ag.de wrote:
Hi Owen,
please do me a favour and forget about that doing stuff in background
while
people think mixxx is
Hey Mixxx,
For showing and allowing mapping of invisible controls, an approach I
suggested was to include a show more button essentially a pullout menu
like little lower right bottom triangle as we have seen before. Turns out
this isn't good.
After speaking to a few of my friends who are
Hello,
My name is Pathogen-David and I am planning to submit a proposal for Mixxx
to Google Summer of Code soon, but before I did I thought I should
introduce myself and get some questions answered.
First off, a little about me:
I've been interested in programming all my life, according to my
10 matches
Mail list logo
