On 06/05/2015 09:55 AM, Daniel Schürmann wrote:
Hi all.
Good news! Thank you RJ.
I just one objection to the C++11 white list.
The new keyword auto.
No auto is awesome. I've started a new simulation Montecarlo simulation
program for my PhD and use exclusively auto to declare my
Hi all.
Good news! Thank you RJ.
I just one objection to the C++11 white list.
The new keyword auto.
IMHO auto helps to speed up the code writing. But it makes the code
harder to understand. Some IDEs are starting to display the real type, but
that does not help
in GitHub reviews or other
Hi Max,
Thank you for the nice blog.
I did not know all these reason pro auto.
I am currently working in a huge c# project, which uses a Mixed style var
/ explicit types.
Since It is not all my code, It is sometimes a pain to understand the code
with all the vars and the
mixed style:
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 4:38 AM, Max Linke max_li...@gmx.de wrote:
On 06/05/2015 09:55 AM, Daniel Schürmann wrote:
Hi all.
Good news! Thank you RJ.
I just one objection to the C++11 white list.
The new keyword auto.
No auto is awesome. I've started a new simulation Montecarlo
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 1:35 AM, Sean M. Pappalardo - D.J. Pegasus
spappala...@mixxx.org wrote:
On 06/04/2015 09:43 PM, RJ Ryan wrote:
* Visual Studio 2013 (12.0)
Does VS2015 offer more C++11 features? Since it's free, we can just
declare that to be the minimum version from here on.
On Fri, 2015-06-05 at 08:14 -0400, RJ Ryan wrote:
Which can pretty much be summarized as use auto to prevent repeating
yourself.
My rule of thumb is, use auto when the type is long AND easily
understandable from the context. So don't use auto instead of QString
just because, but do use
++11`, so we might
want to address this.
Cheers,
Nico
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/208320762/buildlog_ubuntu-precise-amd64.mixxx_2.1~20150605-precise1_BUILDING.txt.gz
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/208320762/buildlog_ubuntu-precise-amd64.mixxx_2.1%7E20150605
I just created a new account and edited a page successfully. I took a look
at your user account and everything looked normal too.
Not really sure what's going on. I can delete the account if you'd like to
try re-creating it.
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Be b...@gmx.com wrote:
I'm still
, Mixxx unconditionally adds `-std=c++11`, so we might want to
address this.
Cheers,
Nico
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/208320762/buildlog_ubuntu-precise-amd64.mixxx_2.1~20150605-precise1_BUILDING.txt.gz
/buildlog_ubuntu-precise-amd64.mixxx_2.1~20150605-precise1_BUILDING.txt.gz
--
___
Get Mixxx, the #1 Free MP3 DJ Mixing software Today
http://mixxx.org
Mixxx-devel mailing list
I'm still getting this error. There are a number of edits I've been
waiting to make around the wiki.
On 04/06/2015 09:43 AM, Owen Williams wrote:
I'll see if I can figure out what's going on
On Mon, 2015-04-06 at 09:27 -0500, Be wrote:
Any idea what's going on with this? Pegasus said he has
this.
Cheers,
Nico
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/208320762/buildlog_ubuntu-precise-amd64.mixxx_2.1~20150605-precise1_BUILDING.txt.gz
Now I can click the edit link, but I still get the same error when I try
to preview or save my edit.
On 06/05/2015 01:32 PM, S.Brandt wrote:
The permissions for your user are fine, you should be able to edit.
Did reset your user, and you should have received a new password.
If you still
Hi
I have updated
http://mixxx.org/wiki/doku.php/coding_guidelines?#auto
according to our discussion.
It is still a draft. Lets tweak it until we have a commitment.
I am unsure what is the recommended version for our own typedefs:
CSAMPLE sample = 0.0;
auto sample = (CSAMPLE)0.0;
auto sample =
On Fri, 2015-06-05 at 22:30 +0200, Daniel Schürmann wrote:
CSAMPLE sample = 0.0;
This one. auto should really only be used when assigning from a
function whose return value is obvious.
--
On 06/05/2015 01:19 PM, Be wrote:
Now I can click the edit link, but I still get the same error when I try
to preview or save my edit.
Do you have any sort of script blocker running? Tests good for me with
Firefox on Linux.
Sincerely,
Sean M. Pappalardo
D.J. Pegasus
Mixxx Developer -
I've posted a PR for some new LateNight display options. I'm definitely
running up against the limits of the skinning engine so I can't do a lot
more than this. But it makes it possible to specifically select the big
waveforms if you want them. It also makes it possible to turn off the
EQs to
CSAMPLE sample(0.0);
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015, 4:45 PM Owen Williams owilli...@mixxx.org wrote:
On Fri, 2015-06-05 at 22:30 +0200, Daniel Schürmann wrote:
CSAMPLE sample = 0.0;
This one. auto should really only be used when assigning from a
function whose return value is obvious.
In a project the size of mixxx (at least as they come up) every situation
should be enumerated and documented (to the extent possible in an os
project). This provides new developers the information to maintain
consistency. The code, especially in a large project that hasn't had the
formatting
are we in violent agreement then? Why not do the optimal thing in the first
place for consistency sake? Rather than rely on the compiler to do it for
you. Especially in a case like this where the optimization is no more work
nor is it less readable.
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015, 7:38 PM Owen Williams
I use AdBlock Plus. I tried disabling it but that did not change anything.
On 06/05/2015 05:56 PM, Sean M. Pappalardo - D.J. Pegasus wrote:
On 06/05/2015 01:19 PM, Be wrote:
Now I can click the edit link, but I still get the same error when I try
to preview or save my edit.
Do you have any
http://stackoverflow.com/a/4470763
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015, 7:21 PM Owen Williams owilli...@mixxx.org wrote:
Since CSAMPLE is a simple type, assignment is best -- and when it works,
assignment is the way to go (hurray for smart compilers eliding copies).
With the form sample(0.0), it gives the
That's what I said?
The compiler is free to elide (remove) the temporary+copying whenever
it can, but copy constructor must still be accessible
On Fri, 2015-06-05 at 23:34 +, Gavin Swanson wrote:
http://stackoverflow.com/a/4470763
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015, 7:21 PM Owen Williams
Since CSAMPLE is a simple type, assignment is best -- and when it works,
assignment is the way to go (hurray for smart compilers eliding copies).
With the form sample(0.0), it gives the impression that CSAMPLE is a
complex type with a constructor.
On Fri, 2015-06-05 at 22:16 +, Gavin Swanson
24 matches
Mail list logo
