My understanding is that we could get 50,000 CI pipeline minutes per
month for free on GitLab, unlike with Travis and AppVeyor that timeout
randomly on their free plans.
On 11/18/2017 04:05 PM, Stéphane Lepin wrote:
Nice! Forgot about it, as I though GitLab's CI doesn't host build
artifacts. B
Nice! Forgot about it, as I though GitLab's CI doesn't host build
artifacts. But it actually does, with an automatic 1 week expire delay
(which is great to avoid further cleaning).
Should Mixxx use GitLab's shared runners or set up its own CI runners?
2017-11-18 22:58 GMT+01:00 Be :
> Or we can s
Or we can switch to GitLab which has integrated CI that can host builds
On 11/18/2017 03:56 PM, Stéphane Lepin wrote:
If Mixxx's download server has enough space for dev build artifacts,
FTPing or SFTPing those would be the cheapest and quick solution to set up.
Otherwise, object storage on Back
If Mixxx's download server has enough space for dev build artifacts, FTPing
or SFTPing those would be the cheapest and quick solution to set up.
Otherwise, object storage on Backblaze's B2 or OVH's Object Storage
services is cheaper than AWS S3.
2017-11-18 18:26 GMT+01:00 Sébastien BLAISOT :
>
>
FYI, travis just announced the availability of deployment.
maybe we can add this and publish the travis-built artifacts like we do
for appveyor.
This way, we will have a way to effectively and easilly test each PR
without a build environment.
sb
Message transféré
Sujet :
