Re: [Mixxx-devel] Fwd: Two ideas [user opinions]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Deferred button execution seems possibly useful. I have no interest/opinion about editable control response curve. ~RAWRR On Wed, 31 Dec 2014 13:39:15 + "Ferran Pujol Camins" wrote: >Hi Juan thanks for your suggestion. For sure both ideas can b

Re: [Mixxx-devel] Fwd: Two ideas

Hi Juan thanks for your suggestion. For sure both ideas can be implemented via controller scripting. But I think they are general enough and that users could easily benefit from them, that they deserve native support. I want to know if other mixxx's developers think they are worth integrating into

Re: [Mixxx-devel] Fwd: Two ideas

Hi Ferran, Nice ideas! I believe that the Mixco framework provides an interesting basis for making the "deferred button execution" feature easier to implement. Take a look at it here: http://sinusoid.es/mixco/ The editable control response curve feature could be implemented there too, but I'd ra

Re: [Mixxx-devel] Fwd: Two ideas

Thank you for your comments Daniel I really appreciate them. I've added what you've said to the blueprints for future reference. Hopefully I will be able to think about it deeply once I finish this course in January. 2014-12-30 0:06 GMT+01:00 Daniel Schürmann : > Hi Ferran, > > thank you for you

Re: [Mixxx-devel] Fwd: Two ideas

Hi Ferran, thank you for you nice ideas and for contributing to Mixxx. Here some comments: Editable control response curve: This idea is a nice general solution for some specific problem. I am in doubt that this

[Mixxx-devel] Fwd: Two ideas

I've made a couple of blueprint describing two ideas that I think would be killer features for Mixxx that any other dj software has: Editable control response curve Deferred button execution (master button)