Nope, I'll take care of it; once it's done, I'll let you know how to
access this information (it's private by default, of course, since the
bugs might be exploitable).
–Nico
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Owen Williams wrote:
> I've never used coverity, but it sounds like it would be a great
I've never used coverity, but it sounds like it would be a great
addition. Is there anything we have to do on our end?
Owen
On Sat, 2015-01-24 at 14:59 +0100, Nico Schlömer wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I noticed that everyone is already quite cautious when it comes to
> memory leaks and such in mixxx
Hey all,
I noticed that everyone is already quite cautious when it comes to
memory leaks and such in mixxx (e.g., using the AddressSanitizer). One
service I found really helpful in the past is the coverity scan [1].
Is there already a coverity instance for mixxx? If not, would you mind
if I set on
