Re: [Mixxx-devel] Proposal: delete the VAMP plugin and SoundSource plugin code

2015-12-10 Thread Daniel Schürmann
Hi, please keep things separate, the FFMpeg Soundsource or which other type is included in Mixxx is unrelated to the Plug-In question since we are only talking about an interface. Of cause this is almost similar to the interface FFMpeg already provides, but it turns out that we can achieve a highe

Re: [Mixxx-devel] Proposal: delete the VAMP plugin and SoundSource plugin code

2015-12-09 Thread Tuukka Pasanen
Hello, As some kind of 'maintainer' for FFMpeg Sound source I say If FFMpeg sound source is facing quality and performance problems they should be sorted out. Biggest problem with FFmpeg sound source is there ain't build that enables people to test with it. FFmpeg has been reworked in 2.1 (mas

Re: [Mixxx-devel] Proposal: delete the VAMP plugin and SoundSource plugin code

2015-12-09 Thread RJ Ryan
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Uwe Klotz wrote: > Yes, I agree. On the long run this is the way to go. > > On the other hand I would like to keep the current (= master/2.1) > SoundSourceM4A based on FAAD2 on Linux until the quality and performance of > SoundSourceFFmpeg is at least comparable. T

Re: [Mixxx-devel] Proposal: delete the VAMP plugin and SoundSource plugin code

2015-12-09 Thread Uwe Klotz
Yes, I agree. On the long run this is the way to go. On the other hand I would like to keep the current (= master/2.1) SoundSourceM4A based on FAAD2 on Linux until the quality and performance of SoundSourceFFmpeg is at least comparable. This also applies to SoundSourceMP3 based on libMAD even