On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 7:30 AM, Owen Williams wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-11-29 at 20:40 -0800, Albert Santoni wrote:
>
>> If I add this to the end of the LibraryTableModel constructor, all my
>> threading problems magically go away:
>>
>> while (canFetchMore())
>> fetchMore();
>
>
>
>>
>>
On Sun, 2009-11-29 at 20:40 -0800, Albert Santoni wrote:
> If I add this to the end of the LibraryTableModel constructor, all my
> threading problems magically go away:
>
> while (canFetchMore())
> fetchMore();
>
> Thanks a ton to everyone that replied, I've been deep in thought a
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Owen Williams wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 13:45 -0800, Albert Santoni wrote:
>> Apparently I didn't read the fine print that says SQLite doesn't
>> support concurrent multiple writer connections, and so the new library
>> code is semi-broken at the moment. To th
On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 13:45 -0800, Albert Santoni wrote:
> Apparently I didn't read the fine print that says SQLite doesn't
> support concurrent multiple writer connections, and so the new library
> code is semi-broken at the moment. To the best of my understanding, we
> have two options for solvin
The point of this is to replace something that is technologically simple (.xml
file) with something that is slightly less simple but more powerful, the
problem with using a full DB is it's heavy and it's complicated to support on 1
target platform (Windows, OSX, Linux).
For lack a good option,
Lukas Smith wrote:
> On 20.11.2009, at 22:45, Albert Santoni wrote:
>
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> (Disclaimer: This is mostly me thinking out loud...)
>>
>> Apparently I didn't read the fine print that says SQLite doesn't
>> support concurrent multiple writer connections, and so the new library
>> code
On 23.11.2009, at 11:27, Andreas Pflug wrote:
> Lukas Smith wrote:
>> On 20.11.2009, at 22:45, Albert Santoni wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> (Disclaimer: This is mostly me thinking out loud...)
>>>
>>> Apparently I didn't read the fine print that says SQLite doesn't
>>> support concurrent
On 20.11.2009, at 22:45, Albert Santoni wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> (Disclaimer: This is mostly me thinking out loud...)
>
> Apparently I didn't read the fine print that says SQLite doesn't
> support concurrent multiple writer connections, and so the new library
> code is semi-broken at the moment. T
