Hi Javi,
you can call you branch as you like.
In general you should branch from the HEAD of the lowest effected branch
if unsure. This way we can finally decide just before merge in which
branch the bug should go.
If it is obvious that it will go to 2.3, you can branch from master.
The only
Hi!
We name release branches and tags specifically, but you can name your own
branches whatever you like :). It's nice if they have a descriptive name
like "fix-foo-bug".
For 2.3.0, there is no release branch yet so you would branch from master.
For 2.2.0, branch from the "2.2" branch since it
Hi.
Just a fast question.
Any etiquette rule on how to name GIT branches?
And from where to branch? I mean, the bug I want to work on has been
assigned to milestone 2.3.0. Do I branch from master or do I branch
from somewhere else?
Thanks in advance :)
Javi
