Re: [Mjpeg-users] "Input signal on more thn one input source"

2006-09-28 Thread Andrea Giuliano
Sorry, here is the command and its output, before actually starting the recording (see -w): [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/media/video8/prove$ lavrec -v2 -t 3800 -U -w -d2 -q80 -fa %02d.avi INFO: [lavrec] Recording parameters: INFO: [lavrec] Output format: AVI INFO: [lavrec] Input Source:

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Image artifacts when recording with lavrec and DC10+

2006-09-28 Thread Trent Piepho
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006, Andrew Piecka wrote: > 2. There are some odd image artifacts that appear at certain spots on an > image that look like a checkerboard. I originally got the DC10+ with > Pinnacle Studio and had never noticed this image problem when recording This looks a lot like chroma noise

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Max size of JPEG frame

2006-09-28 Thread Bernhard Frühmesser
Bernhard Praschinger wrote: > Hallo Hello, Problem solved, i checked the settings of "Kino" which i used to record the movie from a miniDV Camera. BF. >>I used this cmd: >> >>lav2yuv Test.liste | yuvcorrect -Y CONFORM | yuvdeinterlace | yuvdenoise >>-t 3,3,3 | mpeg2enc -f 8 -D 10 -E -10 -q 5

Re: [Mjpeg-users] "Input signal on more thn one input source"

2006-09-28 Thread Bernhard Praschinger
Hallo Sorry, but your mail did not include the output. For further help it would be nice if you can include the versions (mjpegtools, kernel) you used before an you use now. > has anyone of you ever seen the above message from lavrec? > > I never saw it until I upgraded my Ubuntu box from Breez

[Mjpeg-users] ntsc frame to pal field update

2006-09-28 Thread Con Kolivas
Hi all I've been playing with Jerome's extremely useful ntscframetopalfield utility and had a look through the code. There was scope for improvement in the mechanism used to increase the frame rate which would make the final result smoother and the code simpler. Instead of a 6 frame repeating c