olor logos that
appear in the lower corner.
These days much more "harder to detect" cruft is popping up in my TV
shows anyway so I have officially given up on ever doing anything about
this, just accepting the fact that it is only going to get worse.
The days when TV shows were shown s
if anyone else out there is interested
in this fitness stuff and also explaining why you haven't seen many ON
topic posts from me lately or random rants about why Canopus boxes are
so awesome.
--
Aaron Newsome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
On Thu, 2003-02-27 at 13:54, List wrote:
> Well iam so sad about this that iam selling my desktops computers to buy
> a notebook.
> Well now the question any good video capture card that work with
> firewire? Or pcmcia?
Canopus ADVC-100. Problems be gone.
--Aaron
---
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 10:50, Steven M. Schultz wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > From: Aaron Newsome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Good luck getting your DVD player to play back DVD-R DVDs encoded with
> > bitrates this high. If it does happen to work then you have a better DVD
> >
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 08:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm trying to get the best quality mpeg2 that I can before burning it
> to DVD. For some of the high action DV that I have taken, the encoded
> results look pretty poor even with the quality at highest setting (-q
> 1) and bitrate
On Fri, 2003-02-07 at 12:10, Ronald Bultje wrote:
> Hey Aaron,
>
> On Fri, 2003-02-07 at 19:56, Aaron Newsome wrote:
> > Well the DV files might be bigger than MJPEG but the quality is no
> > comparison in my mind. The DV files are of MUCH higher quality than the
> &g
On Fri, 2003-02-07 at 19:18, Steven M. Schultz wrote:
> A ieee1394 card can be found for $20 to $40 depending where you shop.
> The Canopus comes with a nice cable so you don't need to pick one
> up separately.
>
> Welcome to the club :)
>
> Cheers,
> Steven S
On Fri, 2003-02-07 at 13:12, Martin Samuelsson wrote:
> On Friday 07 February 2003 21:10, Ronald Bultje wrote:
> > Although even high-quality MJPEG has some annoying noise, I don't
> > consider this much of a problem, the resulting MPEG never looks bad at
> > all here (long live denoising)... MJPEG
On Fri, 2003-02-07 at 05:28, John Ribera wrote:
> The ONLY advantage of a lml33 or DC10+ is the MJPEG files are smaller than
> DV, but with prices of disks comming down that becomes less of a issue.
Well the DV files might be bigger than MJPEG but the quality is no
comparison in my mind. The DV fi
think of the two products as
compared to each other. Also, the Canopus is cheaper by at least $100
plus you don't need a sound card or have as many problems with whacky
motherboard chipsets (look for posts to this list with VIA problems) or
bus timing issues.
Anyway, that's my 2 cent
On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 12:16, Steven Boswell wrote:
> Finally, I have a question about encoding hardwareright now I have a
> Pinnacle PCTV, which is basically just a Bt878 with an S-Video input.
> Now that I'm doing more DVDs, I'm planning to upgrade to either an
> LML-33 or a Canopus ADVC-100.
hance. It works very well for
me, although I hated the interface when I first started using it. The
"mark in, mark out" way to work makes much more since than kino's
strange "split, split, backup, delete" method.
Hope it help, Aaron Newsome
On Sun, 22 Dec 2002, Steven M. Schultz wrote:
> > From: "Matt Voss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > I also have the following:
> >
> > 1) Iomega BUZ in a dual-boot WIN98/Mandrake Linux 466 celeron box.
> > 2) WINTV Happauge in a WIN2K 800 mhz p3 box.
> >
> > Do I need better capturing hardware? If so
On Wed, 2002-12-18 at 11:08, Jay Graves wrote:
> I am trying to encode some files that I dumped off of a dv video camera
> with dvgrab. I dumped the files in dv2 format. When I run mpeg2enc on
> them I get this line.
> **ERROR: [mpeg2enc] Could not read YUV4MPEG2 header: bad stream or frame
> hea
On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 23:34, Steven M. Schultz wrote:
> If a player can handle the lower reflectivity of one rewriteable
> media it will very likely be able to handle the other format.
> I believe Aaron Newsome (who bought a 724 on my recommendation) has
> v
On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 11:36, Jason Radford wrote:
> > I use the awesome RedRat2 IR Transmitter and perl glue to do the dirty
> > work. As I've recommended to many other on the list I recommend it to
> > you too. It works FLAWLESS for me. You can perform unbelievable acts of
> > complication using
On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 10:52, Jason Radford wrote:
> > And you could do it without having to run your primary display through a
> > TV-Out.
>
> Ah I see...Or possibly put the video on VHS for someone without a
> DVD/computer then, right? What tools would I use under linux for a
> DV to analog ses
On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 09:52, Jason Radford wrote:
> > Then too the 50 is unidirectional (analog -> DV) while the model
> > 100 can do both analog -> DV and DV -> analog.
>
> Ah I did not know thisAlthough (being new to this)What could
> be the reason for going from DV -> analog? j
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 13:18, Andrew Stevens wrote:
> On Monday 25 Nov 2002 6:49 pm, Aaron Newsome wrote:
> > On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 09:06, Steven M. Schultz wrote:
> > > If it's still within its "return period" I'd get a Philips 724 that
> > > do
On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 16:40, Linux Rox wrote:
> From the replies to my question, it looks like the
> Matrox G200TV PCI is the best bet for now (PCI is a
> must, since I want to put multiple cards in the same
> chassis). If you have any other recommendations,
> please let me know.
Have you consid
20 matches
Mail list logo
