Re: [Mjpeg-users] Compare yuvscaler and y4mscaler

2004-01-05 Thread Steven M. Schultz
Howdy - On Mon, 5 Jan 2004, Matto Marjanovic wrote: Thanks for chiming in! > I believe that for downscaling, yuvscaler defaults to its "RESAMPLE" mode, > which is similar to y4mscaler's "box" kernel. The other yuvscaler mode Yes, that's what I thought - the usage summary fro

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Compare yuvscaler and y4mscaler

2004-01-05 Thread Matto Marjanovic
Hiya, >How does its speed compare to yuvscaler when encoding to >similar quality (it that is possible anyway)? I have been >using yuvscaler with the command line call: > > yuvscaler -v 0 -O SVCD -n n > >as a filter. What would be the scaling method whose resulting >quality best aproximat

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Compare yuvscaler and y4mscaler

2004-01-04 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I am encoding from a 672x272 AVI movie. Ah, ok. > > Ah, I see the "-vf expand :504" in the mplayer command. Why is that > > present? Perhaps if that was left out things would work better. > > It adds black borders at the top

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Compare yuvscaler and y4mscaler

2004-01-04 Thread romildo
On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 02:51:18PM -0800, Steven M. Schultz wrote: > > On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] > > yuvscaler -v 0 -O SVCD -n n > > > > as a filter. What would be the scaling method whose resulting > > quality best aproximates to the yuvscaler call above? > > Hmm

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Compare yuvscaler and y4mscaler

2004-01-04 Thread romildo
On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 09:28:30AM -0800, Steven M. Schultz wrote: > > On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > How do y4mscaler and yuvscaler compare when scaling a video stream for MPEG2 > > encoding for SVCD, in terms of speed and image quality? > > I've found y4mscaler to be b

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Compare yuvscaler and y4mscaler

2004-01-04 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > How does its speed compare to yuvscaler when encoding to > similar quality (it that is possible anyway)? I have been I haven't measured it - scaling is the least cpu intense activity that's going on so that has never been the bottlene

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Compare yuvscaler and y4mscaler

2004-01-04 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > How do y4mscaler and yuvscaler compare when scaling a video stream for MPEG2 > encoding for SVCD, in terms of speed and image quality? I've found y4mscaler to be better. Depending on the scaling method chosen (and y4mscaler offers ma

[Mjpeg-users] Compare yuvscaler and y4mscaler

2004-01-04 Thread romildo
Hello. How do y4mscaler and yuvscaler compare when scaling a video stream for MPEG2 encoding for SVCD, in terms of speed and image quality? Regards. Romildo -- Prof. José Romildo Malaquias[EMAIL PROTECTED] Departamento de Computação [EMAIL PROTECTED] Univ. Federal de Ouro Preto h