Re: [Mjpeg-users] Sourceforge CVS caught up with mjpegtools today

2003-10-07 Thread Florin Andrei
On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 19:54, Steven M. Schultz wrote: > On 6 Oct 2003, Florin Andrei wrote: > > > "this procedure forces blocks of a type that don't carry much > > information but are expensive to encode to be simply skipped" > > > > If they are skipped at encoding, with what do they get replaced

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Sourceforge CVS caught up with mjpegtools today

2003-10-06 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On 6 Oct 2003, Florin Andrei wrote: > "this procedure forces blocks of a type that don't carry much > information but are expensive to encode to be simply skipped" > > If they are skipped at encoding, with what do they get replaced when > viewing? Oops - misunderstanding alert ;) It p

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Sourceforge CVS caught up with mjpegtools today

2003-10-06 Thread Florin Andrei
On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 17:09, Steven M. Schultz wrote: > > The new -E option to mpeg2enc is worth trying out the CVS version... Quote: "this procedure forces blocks of a type that don't carry much information but are expensive to encode to be simply skipped" If they are skipped at encoding,

[Mjpeg-users] Sourceforge CVS caught up with mjpegtools today

2003-10-06 Thread Steven M. Schultz
Hi! For those who want to try all the neat new features (and get a few bug fixes too ;)) the Sourceforge anon CVS has finally caught up with the developers. The new -E option to mpeg2enc is worth trying out the CVS version... Cheers, Steven Schult