: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 4:09 AM
Subject: Re: [Mjpeg-users] VCD 2500vbr better quality than SVCD
I think for SVCD if the -K kvcd option and -q 8 (or 9) were used
the results would make a good SVCD video. If the source has
noise then adding yuvdenoise with moderate settings (-l 1 or -l
[ using ffmpeg for SVCD encoding ]
By all means try it (and I will do the same also). Overall
though I am not concerned about the encoding time - queue the
runs in the morning before I go to work and they're done by
the time I return home.
It turns out that ffmpeg
Hello,
I tried with the suggested settings (I don't have them at hand, but they
included passing through yuvdenoise -l 1, and adding -q 8 -K kvcd to
mpeg2enc's command line), and I still find that VCD at 2500vbr looks
better. Especially when there is a fast camera movement, things get
really
I think for SVCD if the -K kvcd option and -q 8 (or 9) were used
Do I understand that using -q will result in a variable bitrate, and thus
in smaller standalone player compatibility?
Maarten
---
This sf.net email is sponsored
Hallo
I think for SVCD if the -K kvcd option and -q 8 (or 9) were used
Do I understand that using -q will result in a variable bitrate, and thus
in smaller standalone player compatibility?
SVCD = subset of MPEG2 = always VBR Bitrate.
The q option only sets the quality you want. But
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Maarten de Boer wrote:
Do I understand that using -q will result in a variable bitrate, and thus
Correct.
in smaller standalone player compatibility?
Not at all. SVCDs use VBR MPEG-2 so there is no compatibilty
issue.
Cheers,
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Maarten de Boer wrote:
and I have to do it at home, where I can dedicate only limited time to
it), but indeed -K kvcd improved a lot. I left out the -N option because
I don't think my source material is that noisy, and I am not sure if it
-N is not primarily aimed
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Maarten De Boer wrote:
Usually a good idea to add -N value with -K kvcd anyhow since the
^Usually^Usually not^
Is this really what you want to say? It contradicts a previous mail of
Fingers ahead of the brain - word 'not' was accidentally left
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Maarten De Boer wrote:
no flow control - what happens if the encoding can't, even momentarily,
keep up (disc accesses, other programs running, whatever)
This is something I would like to comment on. Being an audio software
developer, these are issues that I am rather
Maarten de Boer wrote:
Hello,
Thanks, Steffen, Bernhard and Steven, for your replies. I will try your
suggestions to improve my SVCD recording. I am wondering though, whether
it would be better to stick with (non-standard bitrate) VCD, because
with the same amount of data the quality is better
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Greg Trounson wrote:
SVCD does have advantages over VCD (for a start it's mpeg2-based).
True. One of the main advantages that mpeg2 brings is the
ability to handle interlaced video.
I would create an SVCD, but at VCD resolution (352x288). That should
Hello,
Thanks, Steffen, Bernhard and Steven, for your replies. I will try your
suggestions to improve my SVCD recording. I am wondering though, whether
it would be better to stick with (non-standard bitrate) VCD, because
with the same amount of data the quality is better (since a normal
Hallo
Thanks, Steffen, Bernhard and Steven, for your replies. I will try your
suggestions to improve my SVCD recording. I am wondering though, whether
it would be better to stick with (non-standard bitrate) VCD, because
with the same amount of data the quality is better (since a normal
On Mon, 6 Oct 2003, Maarten de Boer wrote:
suggestions to improve my SVCD recording. I am wondering though, whether
it would be better to stick with (non-standard bitrate) VCD, because
with the same amount of data the quality is better (since a normal
television want show you the higher
Hi!
On Monday 06 October 2003 04:21, Maarten de Boer wrote:
television want show you the higher resolution anyway). Or do you think
that with the proper settings, my SVCD should look at least as good as
VCD, with the additional advantage of following the standard?
Properly encoded SVCD looks
Hello,
I have been tranfering some DV recording to VCD and SVCD, and I am
a bit surprised by the result. I first created the VCD, with a non-
standard bitrate of 2500, and I was surprised how good it looked
(played with a DVD player on a TV). Then I created the SVCD (standard
settings).
Am Sonntag, 5. Oktober 2003 10:48 schrieb Maarten De Boer:
Hello,
I have been tranfering some DV recording to VCD and SVCD, and I am
a bit surprised by the result. I first created the VCD, with a non-
standard bitrate of 2500, and I was surprised how good it looked
(played with a DVD player
Hallo
I have been tranfering some DV recording to VCD and SVCD, and I am
a bit surprised by the result. I first created the VCD, with a non-
standard bitrate of 2500, and I was surprised how good it looked
(played with a DVD player on a TV). Then I created the SVCD (standard
settings).
On Sun, 5 Oct 2003, Maarten De Boer wrote:
(played with a DVD player on a TV). Then I created the SVCD (standard
settings). expecting it to be even better, but in fact it contained a
lot of artifacts (the wringling on large surfaces around borders, I
don't know the slang for)
The
19 matches
Mail list logo
