On Thu, 17 Feb 2005, Eric Jorgensen wrote:
> Does this mean that I need to convert it to mpeg
> twice? once for DVD players, correcting for the pixel
> aspect, and another time for computer playback?
Goodness no.
The playing programs on the computer will "Do The Right Thing"
--- "Steven M. Schultz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, Trent Piepho wrote:
> > If you are going from a non-anamorphic DVD to a
> computer, the input SAR is
>
> He's going, as I recall from computer to DVD so
> it'd be from 1:1 to
> non-square.
>
That brings up
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, Steven M. Schultz wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, Trent Piepho wrote:
>
> > There is no need to do anything special for 720x480 instead of 704x480, you
> > can use the same math.
>
> What about the difference in SAR between D1 and DV/DVD? If it's not
D1, DVD, and DV all
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, Trent Piepho wrote:
> There is no need to do anything special for 720x480 instead of 704x480, you
> can use the same math.
What about the difference in SAR between D1 and DV/DVD? If it's not
a fiction doesn't that need to be taken into account? I have seen
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, Steven M. Schultz wrote:
> Go thru the references and you'll find that NTSC full frame is 704x480
> NOT 720x480. If you really want 720x480 I'll get to that in a minute
> or two...
Actually, you'll find the full frame is 710.85x486. This number is difficult
Hi -
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, Eric Jorgensen wrote:
> I am currently creating some mpeg video from stills
> (png and jpeg) but am having some trouble with aspect
I would avoid JPEG as much as possible - the lossy nature of jpeg
causes the mpeg2 encoding (which is of course lossy ;))
Hello,
I am currently creating some mpeg video from stills
(png and jpeg) but am having some trouble with aspect
ratios and the rectangular pixel problem. I am
working in NTSC and creating in 720x480. However, my
understanding is that I should be creating it in
720x"something else" and letting t
