On Tuesday 13 January 2004 06:27, Steven M. Schultz wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Al Bogner wrote:
What do you think makes a better encoding from excellent sources: the
kvcd or tmpgenc matrix if the result should have the _same_ filesize.
tmpgenc of course. the kvcd tables were
Am Dienstag, 13. Januar 2004 22:09 schrieb Andrew Stevens:
With kvcd you can use higher bitrates. I have to encode a movie
with
Yes, and defeat the purpose of using the kvcd tables in the first
place ;) Depending on the material you can see the effect of the
kvcd
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Al Bogner wrote:
So, if size doesn't matter is it _always_ better to use tmpgenc, also
with _bad_ sources?
Well, if size doesn't matter you can use '-K hi-res' :-)
What I use for high quality encoding is a custom table made up of
the hi-res Intra
Hallo
What do you think makes a better encoding from excellent sources: the
kvcd or tmpgenc matrix, if the result should have the _same_ filesize.
With kvcd you can use higher bitrates. I have to encode a movie with
more than 2 hrs at a bitrate between 4000-4500kbps.
If you have high quality
