Currently my Garmin displays not the Elbe River at
http://www.informationfreeway.org/?lat=53.55294476877115lon=9.737941940023477zoom=14layers=BF000F
And when I look to the Coast, I'll not see Water.
Are there People working on that?
Greetings Sven
Hi Ben,
About the TYP file, are there any plans to have one included for use
with the default style? I don't actually know much about these files
yet so my question might be a bit naive.
Same here. Maybe in the dark and rainy winter months when the conditions
are worse for biking and
Moin,
finally I got my eclipse environment running and was able to build
mkgmap from source. So the next step was my first extension of mkgmap.
Until now a single OSM element was converted into a single garmin
element, i.e. the first one in the style file with the matching expression.
I have
Marko Mäkelä marko.mak...@iki.fi writes:
About the TYP file, are there any plans to have one included for use
with the default style? I don't actually know much about these files
yet so my question might be a bit naive.
Same here. Maybe in the dark and rainy winter months when the
Greg Troxel schrieb:
I don't really understand TYP files, but it seems that having TYPxml
transcoder (both ways) would be a huge step forward.
On Windows you can use the program MapTK for building typ-files based on
ASCII files. And also the other direction is possible: you can analyse a
Moin,
with mkgmap version r-1067 all my style files were ok. Now version
r-1087 reports some errors. For example a ';' is not accepted any more
in a tag value.
What has happened?
Gruss
Torsten
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
On 19/07/09 14:30, Torsten Leistikow wrote:
with mkgmap version r-1067 all my style files were ok. Now version
r-1087 reports some errors. For example a ';' is not accepted any more
in a tag value.
I don't think a ';' has ever been allowed unless the tag was quoted.
So you have to say
Hi
But also the following line from the style file is rejected:
highway=trunk junction=roundabout access!=* vehicle!=* motorcar!=*
[0x26 resolution 18]
What is wrong with this line?
There is a missing '' between access!=* and vehicle!=*
..Steve
On 18/07/09 13:09, Steve Ratcliffe wrote:
Hi
I've run your example and looked at the bounding boxes of everything
important that I know about.
First the actual bounds as given in the input files.
All the bounds below I believe should be exactly equal to this.
Also the first number on the
Hi Maning,
Even better, don't partition the way as I requested but, instead,
please try this patch and see if it makes any difference.
Cheers,
Mark
diff --git a/src/uk/me/parabola/mkgmap/general/LineClipper.java b/src/uk/me/parabola/mkgmap/general/LineClipper.java
index 55aa51d..9bf224d
First off, let me say a quick thanks to everyone involved in this project.
I've only just discovered it recently but wish I had found it much earlier,
it really is incredible to see what has been done so far.
I've downloaded the complete planet-090715.osm.bz2 file, and have been looking
at
Is there a big speed difference when using your patches?
I currently have quite some difficulties running extensive checks, as I can
only create maps via remote desktop.
Principally I think many people await this feature.
2009/7/19 Torsten Leistikow de_m...@gmx.de
Moin,
finally I got my
Hi Maning,
Here's another attempt at a fix. Please try.
Cheers,
Mark
diff --git a/src/uk/me/parabola/imgfmt/app/Coord.java b/src/uk/me/parabola/imgfmt/app/Coord.java
index 54cdc5f..84df73c 100644
--- a/src/uk/me/parabola/imgfmt/app/Coord.java
+++ b/src/uk/me/parabola/imgfmt/app/Coord.java
@@
Torsten Leistikow wrote:
Felix Hartmann schrieb:
Is there a big speed difference when using your patches?
I haven't noticed any significant difference, but I haven't done any
real comparison measurements.
It certainly depends on the number of additionally created elements, but
I think
By all means go ahead. I think many people would welcome a Splitter that
can handle the whole world. I think that Steve Ratcliffe also announced
that he would be working on new version but he will no doubt respond.
If your expectation of less then 50% memory usage is correct then you
should
Thanks! Will try and report problems tonight.
On 7/20/09, Mark Burton ma...@ordern.com wrote:
OK, so it's proving to be a little harder to fix than I thought but I
have high hopes for this version.
BTW - Valentijn, this version could help routing through the tunnel.
Please see if it
Mark Burton schreef:
OK, so it's proving to be a little harder to fix than I thought but I
have high hopes for this version.
BTW - Valentijn, this version could help routing through the tunnel.
Yes! Yes!
Also, V1 and V2 had a couple of these ... contains 0 arc, and this
version does not
17 matches
Mail list logo