JuergenD, has integrated a new function to correct mkgmap address
information on mkgmap created maps. He said that all Garmin maps have a
clearly defined tree structure from top (country) down to
municipalities. He integrated a function to maptk to correct this data
on mkgmap created maps (but
On 03.03.2010 23:59, Mark Burton wrote:
> Felix,
>
>
>> Mapsource 6.13.x never
>> routes above more than 1 border however
>>
> Sadly, that's true for our maps.
>
> But it will happily route over multiple tiles that have been created
> with cgpsmapper. I can take the tiles from the N
Felix,
> Mapsource 6.13.x never
> routes above more than 1 border however
Sadly, that's true for our maps.
But it will happily route over multiple tiles that have been created
with cgpsmapper. I can take the tiles from the NZ opengps map set and
generate an overview map with mkgmap and giv
Hi Felix,
> it sounds like Murphy, isn't it?!? :-)
>
> I am very surprised if this patch fixes routing problems. It only closes
> some incomplete polygons outside the bounding box. Not more and not less.
>
> WanMil
> ___
>
>
Well it didn't really. I j
Hello,
I know that mkgmap does not include the index in the gmapsupp file. If
you want this you have to use MapSource to build the gmapsupp.
Is there any plan for mkgmap to support this? What are the technical
limitations that prevents it to do it?
Thanks,
N.
___
>
>
> On 03.03.2010 00:24, Mark Burton wrote:
>> Felix,
>>
>>
>>> Well at some other points it did not want to route over 2 tile borders,
>>> seems not to be perfect yet - but the greatest step into the right
>>> direction so far when it comes to inter tile routing.
>>>
>>>
>> Hmm, I'm sure that Wa
Daniela Duerbeck schrieb am 03.03.2010 01:05:
> What if you add a list where one can add explicitely which POIs should
> be generated (supermarket, shop, restaurant, etc.)?
I would like to have some action commands for the lines and polygons style
files, where you could specify, that an extra poi
Jeffrey Ollie schrieb am 02.03.2010 21:07:
> I've listened to that argument for a while and I'm tired of it.
And I have tried to fight this anarchy and I got tired of it. So I accepted it
as a fact and became much more relaxed and satisfied with OSM :-)
Gruss
Torsten
_
Mark Burton (ma...@ordern.com) wrote:
>
> Hi Felix,
>
> You will be interested to learn that the problem I mentioned recently
> regarding my polylines not taking the style from the MapTk generated
> style file is due to a bug in MapTk - I contacted the author about it
> and he got back to me today
Hi!
POIs that have no address tagged get "Fix my address" in the Info
screen. That is OK for restaurants, shops, etc. but there are also many
POIs that have no address, e.g. bus stops. So there "Fix my address"
makes not so much sense. What do you think?
Dani
__
On 03.03.2010 12:31, Mark Burton wrote:
> Those people using MapTk will be interested to know that a new version
> has just been released (2.7.2) - among other things, it fixes the
> problems with multiple lines/POIs that have extended types.
>
I tried to remember or find the problem, could y
Those people using MapTk will be interested to know that a new version
has just been released (2.7.2) - among other things, it fixes the
problems with multiple lines/POIs that have extended types.
Also, does anyone know if any of the extended type POI codes do not
show a little dot in the middle
Hi Martin,
> Why would someone want to tag an extra supermarket right at the
> antrance and tag it as supermarket and entrance?
Because contemporary GPS receivers do not work well indoors, it would
seem to make sense to have navigation instructions to the main entrance
of the building. You
2010/3/3 Marko Mäkelä :
> What if you explicitly define the POIs on the map? Taking a building with
> amenity=supermarket as an example, you might want to define a bank=atm POI
> somewhere near the entrance and amenity=supermarket,building=entrance at
> the entrance.
Why would someone want to ta
14 matches
Mail list logo
