Hi Brad
There are various resources on the internet that list type codes that have a
defined Garmin meaning.
I don't know of inaccuracies in mkgmap mapnic.txt, but it might not be complete
and it might include less standard/common meanings.
Most Garmin meanings from above are common to most
So, if they don't have a comment they don't have a standard Garmin
usage? Do all garmin devices follow the standard garmin usage? I
think not, but I don't have solid evidence other than it seems like some
line types 0x06, 0x07, 0x18 won't show on a zumo XT.
I'm trying to understand: when
Hi Brad
Lines like this follow the type code and, as a comment, describe the standard
Garmin usage, eg:
...
[_polygon]
type=0x02
;GRMN_TYPE: Urban Areas/SMALL_CITY/Small urb...nts/Non NT
String=Suburb
String1=0x01,Résidentiel
...
Ticker
On Mon, 2024-01-29 at 17:43 -0700, brad wrote:
> I was
Dear Gerd,
do you have an example of how it should look like?
I can only say, that with the code shown below I get an overlay map
showing the route relations in the desired order: icn on top of
everything and so on. With the order in the lines file and an
appropriate typ file I can manipulate
