Re: [mkgmap-dev] Commit r4314: fix assertion error when option --make-poi-index is used

2019-10-22 Thread Ticker Berkin
which is work in progress. I did not yet make up > my mind regarding lambdas. They are nice to simplify code but > sometimes it is much harder to debug them in Eclipse. > > ________ > Von: mkgmap-dev im Auftrag > von Ticker Berkin > Gesendet: Die

Re: [mkgmap-dev] type/subtype of points and cities

2019-10-22 Thread Ticker Berkin
onal ~ > '!(sunset|sunrise|destination)' { name > 'bicycle=${bicycle:conditional}' } [0x1108 resolution 24] > vehicle:conditional=* & vehicle:conditional ~ > '!(sunset|sunrise|destination)' { name > 'vehicle=${vehicle:conditional}' } [0x1108 resolution 24] > > Can you explain what happen

Re: [mkgmap-dev] type/subtype of points and cities

2019-10-22 Thread Ticker Berkin
Hi Gerd Here is the patch based on the current trunk Ticker On Tue, 2019-04-23 at 11:51 +0100, Ticker Berkin wrote: > Hi > > I think the mkgmap internal handling of types/subtypes of points is > obscure. > > In the points style file, the type code is always full, ie type

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Commit r4314: fix assertion error when option --make-poi-index is used

2019-10-22 Thread Ticker Berkin
Hi Gerd I noticed this problem in April and there was a fix to it in the patch that simplified/clarified point type/subtype and city range handling: http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/2019q2/029623.html The posting didn't elicit any responses, but I think the changes worthwhile. If you

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Please test branch NET-no-NOD

2019-10-21 Thread Ticker Berkin
ay/153273366 is empty. > Do you think that mkgmap should start guessing what the role of the > way is? In this case that would be possible, but I'd still prefer > that someone fixes the data in OSM. > > Gerd > > > Von: mkgmap-dev im Auf

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Please test branch NET-no-NOD

2019-10-21 Thread Ticker Berkin
Hi Gerd Just doing more experimenting with mkgmap-NET-no-NOD-r4304 and options: --no-route --net I get lots and lots of messages like: WARN: uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.reader.osm.ElementSaver 74210002.osm.pbf: ignoring unspecified/unsupported restriction

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Please test branch NET-no-NOD

2019-10-20 Thread Ticker Berkin
t; http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/511855021) is removed from > NOD, length: 22 m > SEVERE (RoadDef): e:\osm_out_work\wales\63240001.osm.pbf: road ( > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/511855021) is removed from > NOD, length: 3 m > ... > It shows that many islands are in

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Option --housenumbers should imply --net

2019-10-20 Thread Ticker Berkin
Hi Gerd I don't understand what is meant by 'Street Search'. Is this just the use of 'Address Search' where the House Number field is cleared? Otherwise looks OK to me. Ticker On Sun, 2019-10-20 at 06:40 +, Gerd Petermann wrote: > Hi all, > > the current code implies --net if option

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Please test branch NET-no-NOD

2019-10-19 Thread Ticker Berkin
higher counts as each end of an unconnected way is > also a routing node. > > Gerd > > > Von: mkgmap-dev im Auftrag > von Ticker Berkin > Gesendet: Freitag, 18. Oktober 2019 16:28 > An: Development list for mkgmap > Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Please

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Please test branch NET-no-NOD

2019-10-18 Thread Ticker Berkin
thanks for testing. I'll work on a patch without recursive calls. > > Gerd > > ________ > Von: mkgmap-dev im Auftrag > von Ticker Berkin > Gesendet: Freitag, 18. Oktober 2019 12:41 > An: Development list for mkgmap > Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] P

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Please test branch NET-no-NOD

2019-10-18 Thread Ticker Berkin
se > play with it and let me know how it works for you. > > Gerd > > ________ > Von: mkgmap-dev im Auftrag > von Ticker Berkin > Gesendet: Samstag, 12. Oktober 2019 19:34 > An: Development list for mkgmap > Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Please test branch NET-no-NOD >

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Please test branch NET-no-NOD

2019-10-12 Thread Ticker Berkin
ces but sometimes there car-park was defined by more than 1 line. Ticker On Sat, 2019-10-12 at 10:10 -0700, Gerd Petermann wrote: > Ticker Berkin wrote > > Do you attempt to isolate small road networks that are not > > connected to > > the rest of the system or just a single road? &g

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Please test branch NET-no-NOD

2019-10-12 Thread Ticker Berkin
r On Sat, 2019-10-12 at 15:33 +, Gerd Petermann wrote: > Hi Ticker, > > I just committed r4302, please try with that. > > Gerd > > > Von: mkgmap-dev im Auftrag > von Ticker Berkin > Gesendet: Samstag, 12. Oktober 2019 17

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Please test branch NET-no-NOD

2019-10-12 Thread Ticker Berkin
Hi Gerd I'm just starting to test this, but looking through the log lines (I get 1260 of them for 2 tiles) like: SEVE: uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.osmstyle.StyledConverter 74210001.osm.pbf: check: road without connection is not written to NOD Newport to Cowes cycleway (OSM id 562475661)

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Please test branch NET-no-NOD

2019-10-12 Thread Ticker Berkin
Hi Gerd Is there a build available for this that I can download, rather than creating a branch. Thanks Ticker On Sat, 2019-10-12 at 10:17 +, Gerd Petermann wrote: > Hi all, > > I've tried to work out under what conditions we need routing nodes > when using OSM input (not polish *mp): >

Re: [mkgmap-dev] [mkgmap-svn] Commit r4300: experimental code to reduce NOD size (option --routable)

2019-10-12 Thread Ticker Berkin
Hi Gerd (I started writing this before your next post arrived) Assuming I understand the resultant behaviour correctly concerning the 2nd change: I'm against the idea not having NODs for terminal roads becoming the default. It may not have obvious effects in heavily built up areas, but

Re: [mkgmap-dev] [Patch] improve handling of only-restrictions with via ways

2019-10-11 Thread Ticker Berkin
n, the > calling code seems to make sure that via ways are not split. > > Gerd > > > Von: mkgmap-dev im Auftrag > von Gerd Petermann > Gesendet: Freitag, 11. Oktober 2019 06:53 > An: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk > Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] [Patch] improve ha

Re: [mkgmap-dev] [Patch] improve handling of only-restrictions with via ways

2019-10-10 Thread Ticker Berkin
__ > Von: mkgmap-dev im Auftrag von > Ticker Berkin > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 10. Oktober 2019 20:51 > An: Development list for mkgmap > Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] [Patch] improve handling of only-restrictions with > via ways > > Hi Gerd

Re: [mkgmap-dev] [Patch] improve handling of only-restrictions with via ways

2019-10-10 Thread Ticker Berkin
=crossing {set mkgmap:road-speed=1} I expect this explains most of the "can't locate arc" errors. Don't worry about any of this on my behalf - I suspect this could be complicated to solve. Ticker On Thu, 2019-10-10 at 19:23 +0100, Ticker Berkin wrote: > Hi Gerd > > So

Re: [mkgmap-dev] [Patch] improve handling of only-restrictions with via ways

2019-10-10 Thread Ticker Berkin
tion is > not completely within the bounds of that tile. > > Gerd > > ________ > Von: mkgmap-dev im Auftrag > von Ticker Berkin > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 10. Oktober 2019 18:14 > An: Development list for mkgmap > Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] [Patch] improve handli

Re: [mkgmap-dev] [Patch] improve handling of only-restrictions with via ways

2019-10-10 Thread Ticker Berkin
Hi Gerd No problems that I can see - but very difficult to test. I've run 'british-isles-latest' with the patch. There is 1 extra error message that a duplicate, ie I get: SEVERE (RoadNetwork): 74220083.osm.pbf: Turn restriction (only_straight_on) http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8727983

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Commit r4292: Fix problem with long roads producing the error message "internal error? The nodeCount doesn't match value calculated by RoadNetWork"

2019-09-28 Thread Ticker Berkin
nodeCount doesn't match value calculated by RoadNetWork: ( http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/24556428) Number of MapFailedExceptions: 0 Number of ExitExceptions: 0 Time finished: Sat Sep 28 07:03:44 BST 2019 Total time taken: 44 seconds Ticker On Fri, 2019-09-27 at 13:48 +0100, Ticker Berkin w

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Commit r4292: Fix problem with long roads producing the error message "internal error? The nodeCount doesn't match value calculated by RoadNetWork"

2019-09-27 Thread Ticker Berkin
Hi Gerd I've just updated my build from 4288 to 4293 and I'm now getting quite a few of these errors SEVERE (RoadDef): 74220089.osm.pbf: internal error? The nodeCount doesn't match value calculated by RoadNetWork: ( http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/26552046) SEVERE (RoadDef):

Re: [mkgmap-dev] crude routing of my gpsmap 276Cx

2019-09-27 Thread Ticker Berkin
Hi It doesn't work like this. The OSM tags can express situations that are much more complicated than can be represented in the GARMIN IMG format and mkgmap processing transforms OSM tags into the the simpler GARMIN data structures. A particular GARMIN device (or other software, eg Basecamp) will

Re: [mkgmap-dev] crude routing of my gpsmap 276Cx

2019-09-26 Thread Ticker Berkin
Hi I've found that my eTrex 30x, asking for a shortest distance car/motorcycle route, will use a road that has mkgmap:car=no as an intermediate part of of the route rather than a much longer route using just valid roads. I've only noticed this where the non-car road is very near the start/end of

Re: [mkgmap-dev] gates

2019-09-25 Thread Ticker Berkin
Hi I agree that this rule is wrong and to express it correctly is complicated, needing expansion of the composite transport modes (vehicle, motor_vehicle, psv) and then testing of all the routable modes (foot, bicycle, motorcar etc) to see if the global access= is relevant. There are only a

Re: [mkgmap-dev] extended & routable types at different resolutions

2019-09-19 Thread Ticker Berkin
Hi Not an answer to your question, but maybe relevant: The default style has, in "options": levels = 0:24, 1:22, 2:20, 3:18 My reading of the "Style Conversion Manual" says that elements with a resolution between the levels are included in the higher res/lower level map; ie. elements with

Re: [mkgmap-dev] how to deal with "Attention: Tile contains both drive-on-left (303) and drive-on-right roads" ?

2019-08-02 Thread Ticker Berkin
> is ignored. > > I don't understand the last paragraph. I thought this is handled well > in inc/access? > > Gerd > > ________ > Von: mkgmap-dev im Auftrag > von Ticker Berkin > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 1. August 2019 21:00 >

Re: [mkgmap-dev] how to deal with "Attention: Tile contains both drive-on-left (303) and drive-on-right roads" ?

2019-08-01 Thread Ticker Berkin
___ > Von: mkgmap-dev im Auftrag > von Ticker Berkin > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 1. August 2019 18:15 > An: Development list for mkgmap > Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] how to deal with "Attention: Tile contains > both drive-on-left (303) and drive-on-right roa

Re: [mkgmap-dev] how to deal with "Attention: Tile contains both drive-on-left (303) and drive-on-right roads" ?

2019-08-01 Thread Ticker Berkin
Hi Gerd Another case where I get similar errors is when there is a barrier that imposes a restriction that is on the join of 2 ways (quite a common and sensible thing to do): WARN: uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.osmstyle.StyledConverter 74210002.osm.pbf: Access restriction in POI node

Re: [mkgmap-dev] how to deal with "Attention: Tile contains both drive-on-left (303) and drive-on-right roads" ?

2019-07-11 Thread Ticker Berkin
Hi Alexis On Thu, 2019-07-11 at 14:31 +0200, Alexis Huxley wrote: > Thanks Ticker! > > > > The splitter output looks okay, though I note it ends: > > > > > > Number of MapFailedExceptions: 1 > > > you should check out this error > > I reworked my wrapper script so splitter and mkgmap save

Re: [mkgmap-dev] how to deal with "Attention: Tile contains both drive-on-left (303) and drive-on-right roads" ?

2019-07-10 Thread Ticker Berkin
Hi Alexis On Wed, 2019-07-10 at 16:58 +0200, Alexis Huxley wrote: > Hi, I'm using mkgmap r4287 and trying to process continent files from > geofabrik, e.g. http://download.geofabrik.de/asia-latest.osm.pbf. > > For about the last six months (today included) I have >

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Polyline code 0x30 won't show up on maps

2019-06-23 Thread Ticker Berkin
Hi I found that, without TYP definition, line 0x30 didn't show on eTrex 30x or eTrex Legend HCx. They were there; hovering the cursor in the right place allowed them to be selected. 0x30 - 0x4f behaved like this Ticker On Sat, 2019-06-22 at 22:51 +0200, Manfred Haiduk wrote: > Hi > > does

[mkgmap-dev] type/subtype of points and cities

2019-04-23 Thread Ticker Berkin
Hi I think the mkgmap internal handling of types/subtypes of points is obscure. In the points style file, the type code is always full, ie type << 8 | subtype, but when the points are read back from the RGN file for the MDR processing, the representation is the same provided the subtype is not

Re: [mkgmap-dev] MDR 9 & 10 groups

2019-04-16 Thread Ticker Berkin
Hi I was wrong - MDR 9 & 10 are correct regardless of the out-of-order 0x28/group 9. Sorry wasting your time. Ticker On Tue, 2019-04-16 at 11:50 +0100, Ticker Berkin wrote: > Hi Gerd & Steve > > When I was running with a small example it seemed that the MDR9 was > wr

Re: [mkgmap-dev] MDR 9 & 10 groups

2019-04-16 Thread Ticker Berkin
Hi Gerd & Steve When I was running with a small example it seemed that the MDR9 was written in group order, each with start record to MDR10 that is calculated on the assumption that MDR10 was also generated in the same group order. However the step in MDR10 caused by a single 0x28/group 9 POI

[mkgmap-dev] mdr5 when no streets (mdr20)

2019-04-15 Thread Ticker Berkin
Hi Another problem discovered when investigating indexes. If you have a map with cities but no streets, MDR5 sets the flag that indicates MDR20 indexes are present, and writes an erroneous byte after each record. Attached patch fixes and adds some more flag documentation. Regards Ticker Index:

[mkgmap-dev] MDR 9 & 10 groups

2019-04-15 Thread Ticker Berkin
Hi While trying to diagnose a indexing problem, I find that a bit code in imgfmt/app/mdr/MdrUtils.java:getGroupForPoi() troublesome: ... * 4-5 Recreation / Entertainment / Attractions * 6 Shopping * 7 Auto Services * 8 Community * 9 ? *

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Building map with Hebrew characters

2019-04-15 Thread Ticker Berkin
Hi Gerd Attached is a patch that takes Steve's changes for Hebrew and a merges his other changes with my patch from 8th Apr that removes a lot of pointless swapping between byte/char and int and also fixes the sign -extension problem. Regards Ticker On Mon, 2019-04-08 at 21:22 +0100, Steve

Re: [mkgmap-dev] how to handle lines and corresponding polygones

2019-04-13 Thread Ticker Berkin
Hi 1st - check if an earlier rule sets area=... Your lines rule will give a line unless it has area=yes - the way being closed has no effect. Use is_closed() and/or mkgmap:mp_created to change the behaviour to what you want Ticker On Sat, 2019-04-13 at 20:07 +0200, Manfred Haiduk wrote: > Hi

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Building map with Hebrew characters

2019-04-08 Thread Ticker Berkin
Hi Gerd and Nick @nick, when you say it works on 4143 but not on 4179, did you test code -page=1255 on 4143, or just unicode? It looks like there are 2 problems. The --unicode assertion error is a 'byte' to 'int' sign-extension problem, introduced in r4167 or r4168 and I've attached a patch

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Building map with Hebrew characters

2019-04-06 Thread Ticker Berkin
I'm away from my development computer this weekend. I'll investigate on Monday Ticker On Sat, 2019-04-06 at 08:16 +, Gerd Petermann wrote: > Hi, > maybe a regression from r4167? > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/websvn/revision.php?repname=mkgmap=4167 > > Gerd > >

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Curious behaviour of map text

2019-03-29 Thread Ticker Berkin
Hi 0x1e04 is a strange choice for an house number point. 0x1e00 is "State" and has a big font and might not support sub-types Ticker On Fri, 2019-03-29 at 13:32 +0100, DD8KQ wrote: > Hi Gerd > > as you suggested, i added the continue statement to the directive, > but, > its still not working

Re: [mkgmap-dev] TREHeader.POI_FLAG_DETAIL, transparent and map background

2019-03-26 Thread Ticker Berkin
t; all-elements. > I also never noticed that the map has no background polygon 0x4b. I > think the proper way to handle this is to set > the transparent flag in ElementTestDataSource.getPoiDispFlag(). > Do you agree? > > Gerd > > ____ >

[mkgmap-dev] TREHeader.POI_FLAG_DETAIL, transparent and map background

2019-03-25 Thread Ticker Berkin
Hi I noticed a while ago that "test-map:all-elements" stopped working correctly. The map it generated showed a box around the map area, but within the map area, the device said 'no-map' and didn't show anything, however POI searches did work. I tracked it down to a couple of lines added to

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Setting mapset-name?

2019-03-19 Thread Ticker Berkin
Hi I've never seen the value of mapset-name (default "OSM map set") appear in any context on either of my devices, but I do see the value of - -family-name on the eTrex Legend in one of the "Map Setup" sub-menus, where there are options to Hide/Show Basemap and Hide/Show {family -name} and this

Re: [mkgmap-dev] mkgmap -c problem (relative paths)

2019-03-07 Thread Ticker Berkin
Hi Are you sure? I think this disagrees with my set-up, which works. In a subdirectory for a particular country, I have script with like: java -jar ../splitter/splitter.jar --geonames-file=../cities15000.zip - -mapid=74320001 netherlands-latest.osm.pbf

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Sample basic mkgmap config file

2019-02-21 Thread Ticker Berkin
it's the firmware, or maybe there is a bug. I guess you see > this problem also with other (longer) street names? > > Gerd > > > Von: mkgmap-dev im Auftrag > von Ticker Berkin > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. Februar 2019 11:38 >

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Sample basic mkgmap config file

2019-02-20 Thread Ticker Berkin
, Gerd Petermann wrote: > What you describe would be an error in my understanding. Can you > still reproduce it? > > Gerd > > > Von: mkgmap-dev im Auftrag > von Ticker Berkin > Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. Februar 2019 19:06 > An: D

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Sample basic mkgmap config file

2019-02-19 Thread Ticker Berkin
m the small, presented list of 5 in this case) and then be shown the matching addresses in just this street. Does this make sense? Ticker On Tue, 2019-02-19 at 17:26 +, Gerd Petermann wrote: > Hi Ticker, > > I don't understand what you mean with > "Removing all the common suff

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Sample basic mkgmap config file

2019-02-19 Thread Ticker Berkin
t --add-pois-to-lines is a rather problematic option, > but I see no need to add no-add-pois-to-lines > - My understanding is that we don't need order-by-decreasing-area > once we have a default typ? > > Gerd > > > ________ > Von: mkgmap

Re: [mkgmap-dev] default style improvements

2019-02-19 Thread Ticker Berkin
Hello Michael Thank you for your work checking all of this and your feedback. See embedded for my comments. Kind regards Ticker On Sun, 2019-02-17 at 11:01 +0100, Michael Poesdorf wrote: > Hello Ticker > > I had a look into the 3 mails/proposals of yours. > Point and Lines are in a way easy.

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Sample basic mkgmap config file

2019-02-14 Thread Ticker Berkin
Hi I have a few suggestions / comments: I don't agree with --recommended because this file will often required some tweaking and eventually become the basis of the new users building environment. I think forward slash (/) works as a directory seperator on DOS/Windows so can always use this. It

Re: [mkgmap-dev] default style improvements

2019-02-11 Thread Ticker Berkin
ested r 4262 and it is working very well for me. > Just adopted some resolutions of lines according to my personal > flavour. > > Regards, Michael > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: mkgmap-dev Im Auftrag > von Gerd > Petermann > Gesendet: Dienstag,

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Shouldn't both options --gmapi and --nsis imply --tdbfile?

2019-02-05 Thread Ticker Berkin
Hi I think it is reasonable that mkgmap, when explicitly being used to generate GMAPSUPP.IMG doesn't generate PC files unless other options imply that a PC image is also wanted - it does take extra time and a lot of memory. Options --gmapi or --tdbfile imply PC files are wanted and should cause

Re: [mkgmap-dev] default style improvements

2019-02-05 Thread Ticker Berkin
Hi Gerd Given the lack of comments and objections, can you apply my 3 patches to default style points/lines/polygons from 21-Jan Thanks Ticker ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk

Re: [mkgmap-dev] default style improvements / upated typ-file

2019-01-21 Thread Ticker Berkin
Hi Some comments on "Some changes to be considered?" On Sun, 2019-01-13 at 11:11 +, Joris Bo wrote: > Hello, ... > Some changes to be considered? > === > Different kinds of public transport are mapped to the same symbol. > For now I choose

Re: [mkgmap-dev] default style improvements

2019-01-20 Thread Ticker Berkin
Hi Here is a patch to change some TYPE element numbers in default/polygons: Changes are: 0x17, which shows as "Park" in green, is currently used for these OSM objects: park, playground, common, garden, greenfield, meadow, grass, village_green, square/plaza Keep this mapping for leisure=park,

Re: [mkgmap-dev] default style improvements

2019-01-20 Thread Ticker Berkin
Hi Here is a patch to change some TYPE element numbers in default/lines: Changes are: Use 0x30 for leisure=track instead of treating it like a footpath. 0x30 was introduced in the last set of changes as the code for various sports tracks (gallop, raceway) Use 0x0b (Road) instead of 0x06 as the

Re: [mkgmap-dev] default style improvements

2019-01-20 Thread Ticker Berkin
Hi Here is a patch to change some TYPE element numbers in default/points: Changes are: Always use 0x2f0c instead of 0x4e00 for amenity=toilet. 0x4e00 isn't findable. 0x2f0c is "Other:Rest Area/Tourist Info". add: tourism=resort [0x2b04 resolution 24] This is searchable under the "Lodgings" >

Re: [mkgmap-dev] default style improvements / updated typ-file

2019-01-20 Thread Ticker Berkin
Hi Sorry about the delay in replying. I couldn't decide on a good colour for Historic either, and, at the moment, I use the same colour for Building, Historic and Amenity. I think the default style should output them as polygons not POI. A typ -file can consider not rendering these polygons.

Re: [mkgmap-dev] default style improvements / upated typ-file

2019-01-14 Thread Ticker Berkin
road_class=0 road_speed=2 > resolution 22] > Line 201: highway=cycleway [0x07 road_class=0 road_speed=1 > resolution 23] > Line 214: highway=turning_loop | highway=turning_circle | > highway=layby | highway=escape | highway=emergency_bay [0x07 > road_class=0 road_

Re: [mkgmap-dev] default style improvements

2019-01-11 Thread Ticker Berkin
Hi Gerd Here is summary of the changes: A few minor layout tidy-ups Add GBR section to inc/access_country Do aeroway=runway/taxiway/taxilane as lines unless marked as area=yes and show these lines even when also a highway Ignore more highways when abandoned/disused/demolished Ignore more

Re: [mkgmap-dev] default style improvements

2019-01-10 Thread Ticker Berkin
rsion > would be OK. > > Gerd > > > > > ____ > Von: mkgmap-dev im Auftrag > von Ticker Berkin > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 10. Januar 2019 10:37 > An: Development list for mkgmap > Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] default style impr

Re: [mkgmap-dev] default style improvements

2019-01-10 Thread Ticker Berkin
Hi Gerd Here a new version of the patch with this wording. Ticker On Wed, 2019-01-09 at 15:15 +, Gerd Petermann wrote: > # squares and plazas > place=square [0x17 resolution 22] > highway=pedestrian & (area=yes | mkgmap:mp_created=true) [0x17 > resolution 22] > # following rule also renders

Re: [mkgmap-dev] default style improvements

2019-01-08 Thread Ticker Berkin
t like > > # assume that a closed way with highway=pedestrian is meant to > > describe an area even if area=yes is missing > > > > Gerd > > > > ________ > > Von: mkgmap-dev < > > mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap

Re: [mkgmap-dev] default style improvements

2019-01-07 Thread Ticker Berkin
Hi On Sun, 2019-01-06 at 08:50 -0500, Greg Troxel wrote: > Bernhard Hiller writes: > > > I often travel on bike in "nowhere land", where hotels and > > restaurants > > are rare. So I think it is good to show both PoIs if a hotel > > contains > > a restaurant. Of course, it would be more

Re: [mkgmap-dev] default style improvements

2019-01-07 Thread Ticker Berkin
s regardless if area=yes is set or not. > So this is not a valid example, actually I can not find one really > evident of missing area=yes on pedestrian areas. > > > Lorenzo > > > > > Il giorno dom, 06/01/2019 alle 17.37 +, Ticker Berkin ha scritto: > >

Re: [mkgmap-dev] default style improvements

2019-01-06 Thread Ticker Berkin
000, Ticker Berkin ha scritto: > > Hi Lorenzo > > > > I know that the OSM definition says square should have area=yes, > > but > > I > > find a vast number where there is no area tag and they seem to be > > square/piazza, eg > >

Re: [mkgmap-dev] default style improvements

2019-01-06 Thread Ticker Berkin
> Von: mkgmap-dev im Auftrag > von Lorenzo Mastrogiacomi > Gesendet: Sonntag, 6. Januar 2019 17:46 > An: Development list for mkgmap > Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] default style improvements > > Il giorno dom, 06/01/2019 alle 12.45 +, Ticker Berkin ha s

Re: [mkgmap-dev] default style improvements

2019-01-06 Thread Ticker Berkin
Hi Gerd see embedded answers Regards Ticker On Sun, 2019-01-06 at 09:11 +, Gerd Petermann wrote: > Hi Ticker, > > I think I understand the changes in the points file and in > inc/accesss_country and they look okay to me. I agree that it is > better to have the hotel POI > for those cases

Re: [mkgmap-dev] default style improvements

2019-01-06 Thread Ticker Berkin
lle 17.18 +0000, Ticker Berkin ha scritto: > > > > > > highway=pedestrian always generates a line and, unless area=no, a > > polygon. This is the OSM representation of a square/plaza, and, in > > many > > cases, needs the routing given by the edge. The ar

Re: [mkgmap-dev] default style improvements

2019-01-05 Thread Ticker Berkin
ehind e.g. tourism=hotel? > I think you often find OSM objects tagged with both > amenity=restaurant and tourism=hotel, > and I'd prefer to find both. Probably a case for continue ? > > Gerd > > ________ > Von: mkgmap-dev im Auftrag

Re: [mkgmap-dev] default style improvements

2019-01-03 Thread Ticker Berkin
: mkgmap-dev im Auftrag > von Ticker Berkin > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. Januar 2019 11:59 > An: Development list for mkgmap > Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] default style improvements > > Hi Gerd > > Do you want me to do another version of this patch before you commit > it? &

Re: [mkgmap-dev] default style improvements

2019-01-03 Thread Ticker Berkin
Hi Gerd Do you want me to do another version of this patch before you commit it? I'd like to get on with the next set of changes; minor things like removing horse= can be done with these. Regards Ticker On Thu, 2018-12-13 at 10:54 +, Ticker Berkin wrote: > Hi Gerd > > My

Re: [mkgmap-dev] amenity=shelter & shelter_type=public_transport

2018-12-28 Thread Ticker Berkin
I agree with Gerd, the examples I've found of shelter_type=public_transport are next to highway=bus_stop or similar and are best ignored. It would be better if the stop was tagged with shelter=yes or covered=yes, then the default style appends * or + to the ref. I have no problem with most

Re: [mkgmap-dev] name-tag-list breaks address search?

2018-12-27 Thread Ticker Berkin
Hi Try removing the quotes from the option when it is the template file, ie: someOpt=value name-tag-list=name:de,name anotherOpt=value Ticker On Thu, 2018-12-27 at 21:22 +0100, Ralf Kleineisel wrote: > Does using the mkgmap option "name-tag-list" break the address > search? > > If I use

Re: [mkgmap-dev] default style improvements

2018-12-13 Thread Ticker Berkin
them. Most of those ways are mapped by HOT > projects, it is very likely that they are not connected or self > intersecting etc. > I'd rather remove the mop up rule instead of adding a lot of "try to > guess better" rules. > > Gerd > > _______

Re: [mkgmap-dev] default style improvements

2018-12-08 Thread Ticker Berkin
Hi Gerd Here is revision to defaultStyleTidy3.patch. The changes are: 1/ change highway=trail to highway=path; add bicycle=no instead of track 2/ don't generate routable line for highway=rest_area Regards Ticker Index: resources/styles/default/inc/access_country

Re: [mkgmap-dev] default style improvements

2018-12-05 Thread Ticker Berkin
Yes - I saw the nodes marked "part of way ..." and just presumed they were the road; sorry for wasting your time. Ticker On Wed, 2018-12-05 at 17:06 +, Gerd Petermann wrote: > Hi Ticker, > > the first example shows why it is not a good idea to make it > routable. It is not connected to the

Re: [mkgmap-dev] default style improvements

2018-12-05 Thread Ticker Berkin
it should be service. Can you give > an example for a rest_area which should be routable? > > Gerd > > > Von: mkgmap-dev im Auftrag > von Ticker Berkin > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 5. Dezember 2018 12:53 > An: Development list f

Re: [mkgmap-dev] default style improvements

2018-12-05 Thread Ticker Berkin
th and other typos during the > last weeks. > > Gerd > > ________ > Von: mkgmap-dev im Auftrag > von Ticker Berkin > Gesendet: Dienstag, 4. Dezember 2018 17:50 > An: Development list for mkgmap > Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] default sty

Re: [mkgmap-dev] default style improvements

2018-12-05 Thread Ticker Berkin
Hi In the latest release default style, all highway=* except pedestrian that have area=yes or come from multi-polygon relations have id 0x05 (Parking lot) In my latest batch of changes the polygon rule is: (highway=services | highway=rest_area) & area!=no [0x05 resolution 22] but, I agree, it

Re: [mkgmap-dev] default style improvements

2018-12-05 Thread Ticker Berkin
Hi Once my current batch of changes is out of the way the next one will be to change some if the element ids, mostly as per posting 13-Nov-18 17:25 UTC I still think these typ files should go into trunk now and the default -typ branch is abandoned I don't like the name 'mkgmap.txt', not sure

Re: [mkgmap-dev] default style improvements

2018-12-05 Thread Ticker Berkin
Hi I agree that bad tagging should be fixed in OSM but: 1/ some of the tags you mention here are acceptable 2/ it is a continuous job as some common mis-uses just get repeated 3/ its time-consuming 4/ it may be difficult for a non-local person to know exactly what the highway really is 5/ my

Re: [mkgmap-dev] default style improvements

2018-12-04 Thread Ticker Berkin
ed path. > 2) rest_area is converted to a routable way? > > Gerd > > > > Von: mkgmap-dev im Auftrag > von Ticker Berkin > Gesendet: Montag, 3. Dezember 2018 16:04 > An: Development list for mkgmap > Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev]

Re: [mkgmap-dev] default style improvements

2018-12-03 Thread Ticker Berkin
Hi Here is the third batch of default style changes. Changes are: Add GBR section to inc/access_country and tidy up the layout LINES A few minor layout tidy-ups Do aeroway=runway/taxiway/taxilane as lines unless marked as area=yes and show these lines even when also a highway Ignore more

Re: [mkgmap-dev] New branch for default typ file

2018-12-02 Thread Ticker Berkin
I just generate an XML file with negative ids like: ... and give as a parameter to splitter after the main osm.pbf map data file. Ticker On Sun, 2018-12-02 at 16:02 +0100, Ben Konrath wrote: > Hi Greg, > > On Tue, 27 Nov 2018 at 18:21, Greg Troxel wrote: > > Semi-related, I

Re: [mkgmap-dev] label rendering

2018-12-02 Thread Ticker Berkin
On my Etrex: Map Setup > Advanced Map Setup > Zoom Levels > Auto zoom: on/off Zoom Levels > 4 controls for the resolutions at which following appear Points/Waypoints/Street labels/Land Cover Text Size (Points, Streets, Etc) > 4 controls for Points/Waypoints/Street

Re: [mkgmap-dev] semicolon in key value

2018-11-29 Thread Ticker Berkin
Hi Much simpler, clearer and more efficient, just: whitewater='put_in;egress' [0x6516 resolution 24] Ticker On Wed, 2018-11-28 at 15:24 -0600, ValentinAK wrote: > Hi Gerd. > Thanks for the answer! > I solved this task in the following way: > > whitewater ~ 'put_in\p{Punct}egress' [0x6516

Re: [mkgmap-dev] New branch for default typ file

2018-11-27 Thread Ticker Berkin
ld be rendered and how?" > Do you think we need another branch or do you think that the exising > one makes no sense? > > Gerd > > ____ > Von: Ticker Berkin > Gesendet: Dienstag, 27. November 2018 11:37 > An: Gerd Petermann; Devel

Re: [mkgmap-dev] New branch for default typ file

2018-11-27 Thread Ticker Berkin
__ > Von: mkgmap-dev im Auftrag > von Ticker Berkin > Gesendet: Dienstag, 27. November 2018 09:56 > An: Development list for mkgmap > Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] New branch for default typ file > > Hi Gerd > > Happy with either, but slightly prefer typ-files. &

Re: [mkgmap-dev] New branch for default typ file

2018-11-27 Thread Ticker Berkin
on't like the directory name TYPs. One reason is that the > directory doesn't contain *.TYP files, the other is that one might > want to write TYPes instead. > I'd prefer typ-files or maybe typ-sources. > > Gerd > > > Von: mkgmap-dev im Auftra

Re: [mkgmap-dev] New branch for default typ file

2018-11-26 Thread Ticker Berkin
Hi Gerd Should we start dist/examples/TYPs/* as per my email on 19-Nov? Ticker On Mon, 2018-11-19 at 12:44 -0500, Greg Troxel wrote: > Ticker Berkin writes: > > > I suspect there will be a few TYP files for different usages. > > perhaps, but as I understand it

Re: [mkgmap-dev] default style improvements

2018-11-26 Thread Ticker Berkin
Hi Gerd Given lack of objections to any of this, could defaultStyleTidy2.patch be applied to trunk. Thanks Ticker On Fri, 2018-11-16 at 16:56 +, Ticker Berkin wrote: > Hi > > This is the next batch of default style changes. > > I don't think anything here is contenti

Re: [mkgmap-dev] closed ways and multi-polygon relations

2018-11-23 Thread Ticker Berkin
Hi I like the solution to have the same behaviour as a polygon that comes from a closed way: the joined way is passed to a concatenation of the lines and polygons rules. It has the tags of the relation and mkgmap:mp_created=true but mkgmap:stylefilter=poly{line/gon} is not added. The option that

Re: [mkgmap-dev] closed ways and multi-polygon relations

2018-11-22 Thread Ticker Berkin
you have to do in the relations style > file. > > Gerd > > ________ > Von: mkgmap-dev im Auftrag > von Ticker Berkin > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 22. November 2018 17:03 > An: mkgmap development > Betreff: [mkgmap-dev] closed ways and multi-polygon relations > > Hi Gerd

[mkgmap-dev] closed ways and multi-polygon relations

2018-11-22 Thread Ticker Berkin
Hi Gerd I'd hoped and expected that all polygons were fed into the 'lines' style processing in a similar manner, regardless of their origin as either a closed OSM way or generated by multiPolygonRelation. This would allow simple testing using just 'is_closed()=true' to effect lines around

Re: [mkgmap-dev] default style improvements

2018-11-21 Thread Ticker Berkin
Hi Andrzej Is this logic general enough to move into the default style? I assume it replaces: # Display highway shield for mayor roads if they have a ref and make them searchable by their name (highway=motorway | highway=trunk) & ref=* {name '${ref|highway -symbol:hbox}'; addlabel '${name}'}

Re: [mkgmap-dev] default style improvements

2018-11-19 Thread Ticker Berkin
Hi Gerd, Andrzej & maybe others I'm trying to understand a couple of bits of logic in the default style: 'relation' sets mkgmap:us_interstate, mkgmap:us_usroute and mkgmap:us_state but I can't find any use of these tags. It looks like these were introduced in revision 3979, 5-Aug-2017 following

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >