> Ok, I tried a different button in svn and now got a patch relative 1143
> only. Is this one better usable?
Yes, it applies to 1148 OK and builds OK.
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/
Mark Burton schrieb:
> Spotted the problem, some of the patch is relative to 1143 and some of
> it relative to 1148. Don't know how you managed that. Perhaps an svn
> wizard can help.
Ok, I tried a different button in svn and now got a patch relative 1143
only. Is this one better usable?
Gruss
To
Spotted the problem, some of the patch is relative to 1143 and some of
it relative to 1148. Don't know how you managed that. Perhaps an svn
wizard can help.
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/list
Hi Torsten,
> And please let me know, whether the attached patch is usable, since this
> is my first generated patch. I simply asked svn for the differences
> between my local copy and the head version.
I haven't tried the patch but a quick look shows that it attempts to
add some stuff that is a
Moin,
I have extended the stop/continue scheme to style-rules without
conversions, i.e. a style rule might now look as follows:
highway=* & surface=sand {set surface=unpaved} [continue]
With this extension the incomplete rules should get an own priority, so
that the processing order of such rule
